Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jennie C. said:
Well, it's sorta off-topic, but...

First, no proof of harm from 2nd-hand smoke. None.
Click to expand...

Slight derail here, there is proof that SH smoke is bad, but that is not my post.

We pulled up next to a guy at a light, the guy in the car next to us was smoking, and keeping the cig out side the window when he was not smoking. My buddy asked why he had the cig out the window.

SMOKER "because I smoke through the filter, and do not want to inhale the second hand smoke".

ME: I told him, "you know 9 out of 10 people quit if they smoke by putting the lit ends in their mouths."/ end derail
 
Johnny Pixels said:
Important points bolded. Bush Snr talks about starting with the UN mandate and then extending it as the US saw fit. This would mean ad hoc planning, which isn't a good idea when it's unecessary and people's lives are on the line.

This is different from planning to remove Saddam from the start, and planning properly for it.
Click to expand...
Since this seems to constitute severe topic drift, I won't persue this further in this thread.
 
Jennie C. said:
Okay, nobody liked my audio-doesn't-sync-with-the-video post, but that was just for fun anyway. I thot maybe folks would like my turning LC into a conspiracy theory. I guess I'm no good as a CT-nut. Well, that's a relief, but it would be fun to be able to fake it.

Back to the LC2E video: I can't put a time-stamp on it like I could the Where Are The 200 Passengers references (oh yeah, they got smooshed by all the gold bullion-i love it).

BUT, the narrator, whats-his-face, kept talking about the fire bringing down the towers (leaving out WTC7 for the moment). As I watched that, I kept shrieking (yes, I talk to my computer, don't you?) "Remember the part where TWO FREAKIN' JETS HIT THE DAMN' TOWERS?"

(i don't think that's a rule 8 thing...i thot those were mostly vulgarities...i hope not)

Anyway. They always harp on just the fires. Not the gi-normus projectiles that sliced thru the buildings. And we saw them a heckuva lot clearer than we did the fires.

Have to go back and look at my questions again regarding LC2E, but I think I've exhausted those that have any real viability. I mean, I was just being silly about some of my others. Inspired by Something No Doubt.
Click to expand...
Welcome to the forums, Jennie C. Be sure to check out the other subforums here. It's easy to get single-tracked and miss out on all the other interesting subjects being discussed here.

Here are some links I hope will be helpful to you.

Sites specific to Loose Change

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/
This is my LC2E analysis, written after I had about 3 weeks of 9/11 research under my belt. It should answer most of your questions about the claims in that video: check the index. A very extensive revision will be out...soon. The HTML is lovingly crafted by JREFer CuttC. CurtC recently created this website on his own initiative. Please send him a few bucks through the Paypal link on the site to help cover expenses.

My LC Guide is also downloadable as a .doc file. http://www.911myths.com/911_loose_change_2_guide_1.doc

Loose Change Creators Speak is a compilation of interviews I put together, with my commentary. http://tinyurl.com/s8ouv

http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/
This is the place for two great videos by MarkyXL: Screw Loose Change Video and 9/11 Deniers Speak.

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
Outstanding research on this blog (It's creators JamesB and Brainster also post here.)

*****
General 9/11 Debunking Sites

http://911myths.com/
The best overall 9/11 debunking site. Go here first for answers. Its creator, MikeW, also posts here occasionally.

http://www.geocities.com/debunking911/
Another great debunking site focusing on the WTC and CD theories.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
Popular Mechanics debunking site
 
Brainster said:
Nice job, as usual!

When I first when over there You Tube was down for repairs; of course I immediately assumed that meant that The Man was trying to repress your information from being seen by the people.
Click to expand...

justw ait til he tries to put it on google, we all know what happened last time (although i think google are equal opportunity suppressors, they got dylan too, lol)
 
Don't forget it's payday everyone. From the Loosers forum, courtesy of Daniels.

I tend to view very suspiciously anyone who has examined these events and still believes that the gov "blundered".

In my mind the JREFers are all paid agents. Perhaps that is an exaggeration but I can't see any other way intelligent people could fail to see the obvious.
Click to expand...
 
Thanks, just nabbed myself the WTC7 high res and currently at the "light poles ripped out of the ground part". The movie should end up being two hours.

So much information ever since the first one. I'm using everything from the Salon.com article to the Landmark Demolition. I even slapped in the Microsoft Flight Simular 9/11 Pentagon video on YouTube (the last 4 minutes of it)
 
T.A.M. said:
The hypocracy in that just kills me.

They proclaim that they are all about challenging the govt. Challenging the Authority....yet when one of there own does it...god help him.
Click to expand...

They even proclaim ther're fighting fascism. In reality they fight fascism by applying censorship. They ban people faster than they can register. Especially people that contradict the admins. It really boggles the mind that they cannot see the apparant hypocrisy.

I've registered over there - and I'm being extremely cautious when posting. But I know it's just a matter of time.
 
realitybites said:
Also... 2nd quarter bonuses are in as well.

Think I'm gonna splurge and buy Uganda.
Click to expand...

Ahh... I wouldn't bother. I thought I'd made a good deal on China last quarter, but an hour later I was hungry for power again.
 
For us Canadian CIA agents, the Medical Plan is what makes it all worth while...lol

:D
 
JamesB said:
That is another example of them wanting to have it both ways. If buildings 5 and 6 had collapsed completely, they would be using that as evidence that it was controlled demolition too.

If the black boxes were found (the Pentagon and Pennsylvania) that proves they were faked, if they were not found (the WTC) then it was not a real plane.

If no evidence shows up that the hijackers existed (the list of victims) then they did not exist, if the evidence shows that they did exist, airport cameras, passports, then it was faked.

Heads I win, tails you lose.
Click to expand...

Indeed, I really hate it when I see CTists argue this way. I've seen the same thing with the bomb sniffing dogs. They were all removed from the towers, and if they weren't, they were fake.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom