• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christophera said:
The significance of the concrete core is seen here.

Demolition
Click to expand...

Yikes. If only you held yourself and your 'investigation' to the same standards you do the official story. Your site has so much disinformation, conjecture held as fact, lies, bad science, rabid ideological bias, and out-and-out lunacy as to be funny--if it wasn't so sad.

What you have is the standard 'crazy person' site that is ubiquitous on the internet. Just another paranoid schizophrenic and a web hosting account with his internet provider.

Got to hand it to you though; at least you stick by your beliefs no matter what, being totally wrong in a bad way included.
 
Observe, Disinformation Is Dissmissal WITHOUT Evidence.

twinstead said:
Your site has so much disinformation, conjecture held as fact, lies, bad science, rabid ideological bias, and out-and-out lunacy as to be funny--if it wasn't so sad.
Click to expand...

I notice you post no evidence when I posted an entire web page of evidence.

Here is another, filled with hard evidence, raw photos of the Demolition.
 
Christophera said:
I notice you post no evidence when I posted an entire web page of evidence.
Click to expand...


I'll echo what twinstead said: your didn't post an entire web page of evidence, but an entire web page of "disinformation, conjecture held as fact, lies, bad science, rabid ideological bias, and out-and-out lunacy as to be funny--if it wasn't so sad."
 
Christophera said:
I notice you post no evidence when I posted an entire web page of evidence.

Here is another, filled with hard evidence, raw photos of the Demolition.
Click to expand...

What I see on your site is a pile of conjecture and vague retellings of "I saw a documentary once." There are no facts, damn few numbers of any significance, and conjecture piled upon inuendo.
 
Christophera said:
I notice you post no evidence when I posted an entire web page of evidence.

Here is another, filled with hard evidence, raw photos of the Demolition.
Click to expand...

Have you ever heard a building brought down by demolition?
Listen to the sound on this video. There are plenty of videos of the towers collapsing, but none of the audio tracks actually includes the SOUND of EXPLOSIONS. Explain that please. Since your site claims C4 was used, it's no fair to weasel out and stammer thermite.

For comparison, a video of WTC 7 collapsing:
From MSNBC

And another one:
Naudet

A REAL analysis of the collapse:
answers.com
 
Last edited:
I didn't read this entire thread, but since it's only 62 pages long, I'm fairly postive that I'm the first one to mention the following:

They didn't free fall.

Thank you very much for your time. The mods may lock this thread now.
 
Mr. Brown:

If you should feel well enough to continue, let's once again address your buildings-fell-in-the-wrong-order claim, which we had been discussing before you were suspended (not banned) here*. Would you like to?

Also, what are your plans for presenting your various materials to one or more structural engineers?

*In addition, an admission that you were mistaken when you claimed on the phsyorg forum that you were banned, not to mention an apology to me for your unprovoked personal attacks, would be appropriate, don't you think?
 
TK0001 said:
I didn't read this entire thread, but since it's only 62 pages long, I'm fairly postive that I'm the first one to mention the following:

They didn't free fall.

Thank you very much for your time. The mods may lock this thread now.
Click to expand...
Since its only 62 pages, I calculate (via the patented "Killtown rectal extraction" method) that the statement "they didn't freefall" has been made 600 times.
 
OK, I started reading this thread and stopped when I saw this:


Christophera said:
Absolutely, the planes were a cover for the fact that the building were built to be demolished and scheduled for 9-11.
Click to expand...

Thanks for saving me a bunch of time Mr. Brown.
You are clearly not a serious person.
 
My Critics Use Rhetoric Not Evidence = Weak

MortFurd said:
More Videos of WTC 7 collapsing.
Click to expand...

Notice, that in all the posts criticizing my web site with its prolific uses of raw evidence, the is not one piece of evidence used. All just words.

Her are some words from firefighters that I will believe, because their brothers were killed in a high speed series of detonations that raced to the ground at a rate just slightly faster than free fall.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/discussion_in_firehouse.mpg

Watch the critics try to twist the words of these good men speaking the truth, and they will do so with no evidence again and again. The thousands of innocent Americans that died on 9-11 are nothing to them. The tens of thousands who have died in the wars illegally waged and paid for by more innocent Americans, . . . . YOU, . . . . . . are nothing to them.

They act on some great fear hidden deep inside themselves. A fear of the truth, knowing it or allowing anybody else to know it.
 
Christophera said:
Watch the critics try to twist the words of these good men speaking the truth, and they will do so with no evidence again and again. The thousands of innocent Americans that died on 9-11 are nothing to them. The tens of thousands who have died in the wars illegally waged and paid for by more innocent Americans, . . . . YOU, . . . . . . are nothing to them.

They act on some great fear hidden deep inside themselves. A fear of the truth, knowing it or allowing anybody else to know it.
Click to expand...

Whoa, Chris. You're frothing at the mouth, fella! I think you've watched Network too many times. What the Hell does this ridiculous soap-box speech have to do with this discussion. Yet another diversionary tactic.
 
Christophera said:
Notice, that in all the posts criticizing my web site with its prolific uses of raw evidence, the is not one piece of evidence used. All just words.

Her are some words from firefighters that I will believe, because their brothers were killed in a high speed series of detonations that raced to the ground at a rate just slightly faster than free fall.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/discussion_in_firehouse.mpg

Watch the critics try to twist the words of these good men speaking the truth, and they will do so with no evidence again and again. The thousands of innocent Americans that died on 9-11 are nothing to them. The tens of thousands who have died in the wars illegally waged and paid for by more innocent Americans, . . . . YOU, . . . . . . are nothing to them.

They act on some great fear hidden deep inside themselves. A fear of the truth, knowing it or allowing anybody else to know it.
Click to expand...
Listen to what those men actually said. "As if it had detonated." Not "It was detonated."
Learn to hear reality, not just your wishful thinking.

Why are there no recordings of the sound of detonations?
 
FOOLMEWUNZ said:
Whoa, Chris. You're frothing at the mouth, fella! I think you've watched Network too many times. What the Hell does this ridiculous soap-box speech have to do with this discussion. Yet another diversionary tactic.
Click to expand...


Oh don't mind Chris. He just has to have an emotionally charged rant every now and then. It's just his thing.

Don't worry he will return to spamming links to his website and photos that clearly show 3" rebar on 4' centres pretty soon.

-Andrew
 
Christophera said:
Her are some words from firefighters that I will believe, because their brothers were killed in a high speed series of detonations that raced to the ground at a rate just slightly faster than free fall.
Click to expand...

How would that work ? And how "fast" is free fall ?

Watch the critics try to twist the words of these good men speaking the truth
Click to expand...

Sounds like bible-thumping to me.
 
Christophera said:
Notice, that in all the posts criticizing my web site with its prolific uses of raw evidence, the is not one piece of evidence used. All just words.

Her are some words from firefighters that I will believe, because their brothers were killed in a high speed series of detonations that raced to the ground at a rate just slightly faster than free fall.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/discussion_in_firehouse.mpg

Watch the critics try to twist the words of these good men speaking the truth, and they will do so with no evidence again and again. The thousands of innocent Americans that died on 9-11 are nothing to them. The tens of thousands who have died in the wars illegally waged and paid for by more innocent Americans, . . . . YOU, . . . . . . are nothing to them.

They act on some great fear hidden deep inside themselves. A fear of the truth, knowing it or allowing anybody else to know it.
Click to expand...

Notice how Christophera has nothing to rely on except the ambiguous comments made immediately after the incident. Notice how Christophera has not contacted any of these firefighters to ask them if they actually believe it was demolitions or not. Notice how Christophera simply chooses the parts of evidence that are consistent (in his mind) with the theory of CD and a concrete core, and ignores the gigantic, WTC tower-sized pile of evidence that is not.
 
Huntsman said:
Notice .... Notice ..... Notice......
Click to expand...

I'll tell you what I just noticed.... There's a newbie over on the "Welcome New Meat" thread. Christopher7. (I was relatively polite....)

What worries me is that if we've been talking to (at?) ChristopherA and the new guy's Christopher7, are we going to encounter ChristopherB through Z and then Christopher1 through 6?

Arrrrgggghhhh!:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom