JonBenet killer arrested - psychics not involved

bjb said:
Another factor is that there are several psychic sketches of the same suspect. If enough sketches are made, eventually one of them is going to be close. By the way, why don't all of the psychic sketches look the same?
Click to expand...
I knew you were going to say that.
 
FFed said:
Didn't Sylvia Browne "predict" that the case would never be solved and the killer was a women? I seem to remember her saying that some time ago.
Click to expand...
I haven't been able to find that on her site. I'd be interested in the link if anyone has it.

btw regarding Sylvia, see this clip.
 
Dave1001 said:
Let's give this one to the psychic. It may have been random chance, but she got his likeness in a statistically improbable way.
Click to expand...


Give whatever you want to this psychics, I don't think this guy did it.
 
I am just going by what Sylvia said from memory. With all the psychics on TV these days it could have been someone else, but I think it was her. I will try and google around and see if I can find anything on her and the case. Being this high profile surely someone must have asked her.
 
RichardR said:
[qimg]http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/images/08/17/newt1.video.karr.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://www.crimelibrary.com/graphics/photos/notorious_murders/famous/ramsey/12a.jpg[/qimg]

The chin and mouth look the same. Nose is similar. Hairstyle is different, but that can change anyway, Eyes are similar; eye brows different. Shape of head is different. Age looks roughly correct.
Click to expand...

Actually, the suspect's lips are much fuller than the sketch, the sketch's chin doesn't jut out as much, and the the nostrils are less arched. So the mouth, chin and nose are different, too. The shape of the eyes is really the only thing that matches. And that's not much.
 
RichardR said:
What makes you think that?
Click to expand...

He seems to have been obsessed with the case, to have communicated with the family, to have written about it extensively in college and to have been in a different state when the crime was committed. He's turning out to look less like a goober and more like a nut.
 
Last edited:
Loss Leader said:
He seems to have been obsessed with the case, to have communicated with the family, to have written about it extensively in college and to have been in a different state when the crime was committed. He's turning out to look more like a goober and less like a nut.
Click to expand...
Thanks. Yes, I was wondering about that - especially his confession. Time will tell, but I agree it doesn't look too certain as of now.
 
As he never mentioned the ransom note-which I mentioned earlier-then its safe to assume he is a nut! How many killers confess prior to arrest,really?
Probably wanted a free ride back to US.
 
DNA or no DNA

Starthinker said:
Latest reports are fishy. Ex says he was in another state etc. etc..
Click to expand...

Okay - the fish stories. This guy is kind of creepy - but the facts don't match up.

"They either have a miss or a match on the DNA," former Denver prosecutor Craig Silverman said. "If it's a miss, the prosecution has serious problems. If it's a match, then it's game, set and match for this case. Couple the DNA with the kooky confession and it's enough for most people to convict."

Time to be skeptical? A strange case indeed.

WD
 
Hmm, a CNN breaking news email just said that he mentioned details about the body that had not been released to the public.

ETA: link
 
roger said:
Hmm, a CNN breaking news email just said that he mentioned details about the body that had not been released to the public.
Click to expand...
How can the police be certain that some information hasn't been released? People talk and gossip, journalists pick up things and publish them.
I remember when the Yorkshire Ripper investigation was completely derailed (allowing the killer to murder more women) by a tape made by a man claiming to be the Ripper;the accompanying letter mentioned a detail of one of the murders that was thought to have been kept secret, when it had actually been published in a small-circulation regional newspaper.
Like Loss Leader said, he's been obsessed with the case for years, so could easily have picked up some little bit of information that wasn't wdely known.
 
FFed said:
I'll wait for the DNA tests before jumping to conclusions. This guy might just be one of those that confess to crimes without doing it.

Didn't Sylvia Browne "predict" that the case would never be solved and the killer was a women? I seem to remember her saying that some time ago.
Click to expand...

The more that I hear on the news, the less I think he did it. I think he is just some sick pedophile that had a infatuation with Jon Benet. He was living in Georgia at the time of the murder. I guess he could have traveled to Colorado, but I am not sure. We'll have to wait for the DNA match to come back. But that didn't work with OJ though, did it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom