ysabella
Muse
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2005
- Messages
- 701
There is an existing thread on this but it's in the Politics forum, which isn't really the focus I wanted.
I keep reading of mothers wanting to have chicken pox parties. They believe that the immunity conferred by having the disease is superior to the immunity conferred by having the vaccine. I'm trying to figure out whether there's any truth to that. Most of them do say that if their child doesn't get chicken pox by a certain age, they will have them vaccinated at that time, which makes sense.
But is catching it 'wild' really going to confer better immunity than the vaccine? Neither is 100% protective, after all.
I keep reading of mothers wanting to have chicken pox parties. They believe that the immunity conferred by having the disease is superior to the immunity conferred by having the vaccine. I'm trying to figure out whether there's any truth to that. Most of them do say that if their child doesn't get chicken pox by a certain age, they will have them vaccinated at that time, which makes sense.
But is catching it 'wild' really going to confer better immunity than the vaccine? Neither is 100% protective, after all.