Regardless, I have to second jmercer.....I think it's a great story idea. You could have a lot of fun with it.
I'm having other story fun at the moment. I have number of good ideas sitting on the shelf. But I won't leave this one to rot.
Regardless, I have to second jmercer.....I think it's a great story idea. You could have a lot of fun with it.
I'm having other story fun at the moment. I have number of good ideas sitting on the shelf. But I won't leave this one to rot.
Just so people know, nuerons are not stable, they grow and are altered in thier property in the network, they are potentiated and attenuated to 'fire', they are not static and just like any good storgae and processing system ther is a lot of redindancy in the nueral network.
Uhm...
If only God can create a soul and create life, then why would the Church care about saving the souls of the people who were beamed to somewhere else?
They would be nothing but souless p-zombies, after all.
Sorry if I missed the explanation for this somewhere along the thread...
But is a person with alzheimers the same person they used to be, is thier consciousness the same, why is this different or the same to a person without alzheimer's?
we're down to that inanswerable issue - what is consciousness? Urk.
So, let's start ticking off what it isn't.
It isn't your ego image of who you are.
So that's an interesting consideration. I suspect that consciousness would still exist if there were full sensory deprivation - but how do we prove that?
Ok. So the list of what is not consciousness seems to be a very short one so far.
What's left is rediculously large. I can't even say "Consciousness is not physical", because it very well could be.
Wish I could assume you refer to behaviors more complicated than pigeons playing ping-pong. While according to Skinner...In Operant Conditioning, behaviors are defined by their function (as opposed to the topology of the behavior); it does not matter what the details of the movements are, what matters is what is accomplished. (as a simple example, it does not matter whether, in basketball, one shoots a foul shot right-handed, left-handed, two-handed, underhanded...what matters is whether or not it goes in.)
Given that the OP spoke of awareness and consciousness issues, the "function" is understood to be defined by those behaviors. If consciousness is dependent on nerve function, then that function is served--by definition in the OP--by the replacement. If, on the other hand, consciousness is not dependent on nerve function, then the replacement is irrelevant. Using the phrase "precisely the same function" renders the question trivial.
In a behavioristic world (material determinism) wouldn't all of our thoughts/behaviors be determined?. . . the conditions that determine the form of probability of an operant are in a person’s history . . . they are easily overlooked. It is then easy to believe that the will is free . . . . The spontaneous generation of behavior has reached the same stage as the spontaneous generation of maggots and microorganisms in Pasteur’s day.
http://hal.psych.uw.edu.pl/2004zalaczniki/Malone_2.pdf