Gravy
Downsitting Citizen
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2006
- Messages
- 17,078
I had posted this in another thread. Killtown asked that I start a new thread.
Glad you're here, Killtown.
In other forums where you post, I've posted as "Murdervillage" and repeatedly asked you questions that you simply ignored. You also deleted my posts on your blog, which presented evidence that contradicted your claims. Are these the ways of a truthseeker?
Here's an example of a post that you did not respond to:
http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?showtopic=135
Please now answer these questions:
1) You claim to be investigating the events of 9/11. You have a great deal of information on your websites, and claim to have over 200 "smoking guns" that show that the attacks were not carried out according to the official version. You claim that flights 93 and 77 did not crash where the OV says they did. Who, among the thousands of first responders and investigators at those scenes, have you spoken to, and what did they say? I've asked you this at least a dozen times. Please respond now.
2) You have repeatedly stated that the red bandanna found at the flight 93 scene could not have survived the crash. The post above shows many other items that survived, and the Moussaoui trial exhibits show more. What is your reaction to this evidence, and will you change the way you present this claim?
3) Why do you think that a 757's tail section would remain intact after a nearly 600 mph head-on collision with the ground?
4) Likewise, why do you think the "nose cone" of the plane that hit the Pentagon remained intact and caused the exit hole damage in C ring?
I look forward, finally, to your replies.
edited to fix link.
Glad you're here, Killtown.
In other forums where you post, I've posted as "Murdervillage" and repeatedly asked you questions that you simply ignored. You also deleted my posts on your blog, which presented evidence that contradicted your claims. Are these the ways of a truthseeker?
Here's an example of a post that you did not respond to:
http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?showtopic=135
Please now answer these questions:
1) You claim to be investigating the events of 9/11. You have a great deal of information on your websites, and claim to have over 200 "smoking guns" that show that the attacks were not carried out according to the official version. You claim that flights 93 and 77 did not crash where the OV says they did. Who, among the thousands of first responders and investigators at those scenes, have you spoken to, and what did they say? I've asked you this at least a dozen times. Please respond now.
2) You have repeatedly stated that the red bandanna found at the flight 93 scene could not have survived the crash. The post above shows many other items that survived, and the Moussaoui trial exhibits show more. What is your reaction to this evidence, and will you change the way you present this claim?
3) Why do you think that a 757's tail section would remain intact after a nearly 600 mph head-on collision with the ground?
4) Likewise, why do you think the "nose cone" of the plane that hit the Pentagon remained intact and caused the exit hole damage in C ring?
I look forward, finally, to your replies.
edited to fix link.
Last edited:
