Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[gumboot]

Good work guys, you are real good losers.

Whatever you say...

-Andrew

 

[kevin]

Why not make a web page about the steel core of the towers like I have with the concrete core site?

http://noconcretecore.741.com/

you really should update your own page if you claim to have remembered the name of the documentary. A link to proof of the existance of the documentary would be nice too.

BTW, do you still claim that a 1990 documentary had photos of an exploding world trade center in it? How do explain the time travel required?

 

[kookbreaker]

Oh look, a building that actually has a concrete core

Funny how they build that part first, so its kinda noticeable in the construction photos.

 

[CptColumbo]

Remarkable. An entire website trying to document something that didn't exist and doing so by misrepresenting images of the WTC towers during construction ...

Sometimes irony can be pretty ironic.

BTW why did you lie?

 

[kevin]

Oh look, a building that actually has a concrete core

Oh yeah, this reminds me. Christophera - you claim that the core was being built 7 stories below the floor under construction. Out of curiorsity -- what did they attach the 7 stories between the supposed core and the top of construction to? Did they just hang them out in space?

 

[kevin]

(2) The concrete core acted as the building's vertebrate. But it only carried the dead load of the elevators and stairwells within.

This directly contradicts the claim on your page:

Distribution of gravity loads was; perimeter walls 50%, interior core columns 30% core 20%.

so are you wrong or are the grade school kids wrong?

(5) Concrete Core - central column supports much of building's weight

Smart kids!

Very smart since that comes from the section on New Safety Design Features that are "IMPROVING UPON THE ORIGINAL DESIGN" and not the section about the construction of the world trade centers.

 

[kevin]

Christophera - Please explain how a window squeegee can dig through a concrete core.

http://americanhistory.si.edu/september11/collection/record.asp?ID=35

 

[CptColumbo]

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=5637&st=90

Chris has found a friend or a sock puppet.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Mr. Brown:

For the third time, how is it you are able to post if you have been banned?

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Could thermite have caused the free fall?

 

[MarkyX]

Could thermite have caused the free fall?

Just a quickie, but same Crazy Chainsaw on MySpace?

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Ya same one.

The one with some of the answers, but making you wait.

 

[Metullus]

Could thermite have caused the free fall?

Well, given that the WTC buildings did not collapse at "free fall" I would say that the answer is "no".

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Well, given that the WTC buildings did not collapse at "free fall" I would say that the answer is "no".

There may be a little more to this than most know something totally new something discovered by Dr. Greening and a nut with a chainsaw who likes to drop hammers in his back yard.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Yes, that was certainly clear.

 

[Metullus]

There may be a little more to this than most know something totally new something discovered by Dr. Greening and a nut with a chainsaw who likes to drop hammers in his back yard.

Err... and your point is...?

 

[Foolmewunz]

Questions to the Community (not you Christophera... I mean the community of the sensible).

Post 1612 isn't that the EXTERNAL (Chris - that would be "external" as in "outside" or "not inside" or "no friggin' part of no core, dude") stairway that came down from the northern edges of the plaze to run down to Vesey street? (Next to an escalator that's clearly missing...) There were several (I can think of two or three...) such outdoor stairways. I assume Gravy has the best local "lay of the land" and will know.

I think what CC is referring to is actually a fairly nice analysis (which from my lay perspective could be so much mumbo-jumbo) of the possibility of thermite having been created from the reaction of the molten aluminum and other substances; even causing explosions of a sort. Has anyone vetted this for accuracy? I can't post links yet but it's under 911 Myths / Other Contributions / the guy's name is Greening, I think.

(I'm a newbie - apologies if these have been answered/addressed, already.)

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Err... and your point is...?

Oh I just think a link has been found to all three buildings, something that makes aluminum burn, forms explosive thermite compounds, and causes reactions is steel. Just it is so simple that no one except myself, and Dr.Greening ever thought about it before.
IT was also not involved in the Experiment DR. Jones did, and without it thermites can not form.
I Know that there is no interest in new Information here so I guess I should just move on.

 

[Doubt]

I Know that there is no interest in new Information here so I guess I should just move on.

There is a great deal of interest here in new information. But many here have little tolerance for people who say they have information and then don't reveal it. That is what you have been doing.

Maybe if you offered a reason for withholding information, somebody could take you seriously. Or better yet, spill the beans and just tell us what you think you have. Until then, you come off much like the cranks with perpetual energy machines who say they cannot tell us how it works.

If you wish to be taken seriously, then drop the games and tell us what you know.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

I promised Prof. Eagar I would not reveal it until his brother publishes the article, in the paper he works for however I did not promise not to leave clues and let smart intelligent people figure it out for themselves.