ObscureReferenceMan
Muse
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2005
- Messages
- 566
Oh no! Did I miss the session?
Well I'll give you an example. If someone told you that bunji jumping was fun you would have to do it before you knew for sure it was fun. There by proving to yourself that it was fun or not.Prove what, exactly? Some sort of healing? Medicines are tested every day, as we speak. It is time-consuming and expensive, but very simple in principle. If you continue posting here a while, you will find that people use words like "placebo-controlled double-blind trials". I recommend you make yourself familiar with these concepts as soon as possible. It is the only way to test if any kind of healing actually works, and how well it works. At least that I know of.![]()
I read a lot of reasearch on Reiki and Theriputic touch as well as polarity threapy and others.Ahweh,
I sat with you. I wasn't expecting anything, because I didn't make any sort of intent. It was just another opportunity to be still and receptive.
Don't look upon requests for objective research on T.T. and Reiki as hostile to what you are doing. Some solid research needs to be done in the area of how touch can engage the parasympathetic nervous system and encourage the release of endorphins that relieve stress and pain and indirectly aid the body's recovery process.
Ahweh said:I will start by saying I am also a Skeptic and have been for a very long time so the following statment should resonate with some...
From what I've seen written here about Reiki, it's a contradiction in terms to be both a skeptic and a Reiki Master.Ahweh said:I read a lot of reasearch on Reiki and Theriputic touch as well as polarity threapy and others.
My wife and I are both Reiki Masters and have grown beyond.
I was already doing Energy Healing before I did anything with Reiki.From what I've seen written here about Reiki, it's a contradiction in terms to be both a skeptic and a Reiki Master.
Did you go on the Reiki course but doubt that it works?
I will seriously look into that because this site is new to me I have to read up on the guidlines of the test and who knows we might get it done.Why don't you just send in an application to the JREF so you can run a proper test? It could mean an extra million for you.
This is from the Nipping ‘energy healing’ in the bud thread.What exactly does all of this heal?
So, you are claiming that sitting with your arms and legs uncrossed is FUN? Sure, if there is something interesting on TV...Well I'll give you an example. If someone told you that bunji jumping was fun you would have to do it before you knew for sure it was fun. There by proving to yourself that it was fun or not.
No amount of documation can prove anything to you, You have to prove things to yourself by experiencing whatever it is that you want proven so you know if it is real or not.
Sorry, anecdotes. Inadmissable.This is from the Nipping ‘energy healing’ in the bud thread.
<anecdotes snipped>
Not inadmissable. Simply of very low value. Indicative of directions for serious investigation to take, if such investigation is considered worthwhile.Sorry, anecdotes. Inadmissable.![]()
I was already doing Energy Healing before I did anything with Reiki.
I proved Energy healing to myself when My uncle got hurt in a farming accident. He was in intensive care and hooked up to all kinds of monitors. I walked up and looked at the monitors they were going nuts he was in a lot of pain so I put my hands on him and the monitors instantly quieted down and he fell asleep. When I removed my hands the monitors went nuts again and my uncle woke up. I went through this process a couple of times to be sure it was not some fluke happening. My aunt came in so I stoped helping him she at the time didn't understand what energy healing was. I used the science behind the medical monitors to verify this ability to myself because I know no one can prove anything to me I have to prove it to myself.
I will start by saying I am also a Skeptic and have been for a very long time so the following statment should resonate with some.
No One Can Prove Anything To Anyone About Anything Anytime You Yes You Have To Prove It To Yourself.
...
source: http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/talks/LiU/sci_method_2.htmlMichael Shermer on "The Scientific Method"*
Elements of the scientific method ( hypothetico-deductive):
Induction -- Forming a hypothesis by drawing general conclusions from existing data.
Deduction -- Making specific predictions based on the hypothesis.
Observation -- Gathering data, driven by hypothesis that tell us what to look for in nature.
Verification -- Testing the predictions against further observations to confirm or falsify the initial hypothesis.
Through the scientific method, we may form the following generalizations:
Hypothesis -- A testable statement accounting for a set of observations.
Theory -- A well-supported and well-tested hypothesis or set of hypotheses.
Fact -- A conclusion confirmed to such an extent that it would be reasonable to offer provisional agreement.
Through the scientific method, we aim for objectivity: basing conclusions on external validation. And we avoid mysticism: basing conclusions on personal insights that elude external validation.
Science leads us toward rationalism: basing conclusions on logic and evidence. And science helps us avoid dogmatism: basing conclusions on authority rather than logic and evidence.
It is important to recognize the fallibility of science and the scientific method. But within this fallibility lies its greatest strength: self-correction.
A scientific law is a description of a regularly repeating action that is open to rejection or confirmation.
Scientific progress is the cummulative growth of a system of knowledge over time, in which useful features are retained, and nonuseful features are abandoned, based on the rejection or confirmation of testable knowledge.
Pseudoscience: claims presented so that they appear scientific even though they lack supporting evidence and plausibility.
Modern skepticism is embodied in the scientific method, which involves gathering data to test natural explanations for natural phenomenon. A claim becomes factual when it is confirmed to such an extent that it would be reasonable to offer temporary agreement. But all facts in science are provisional and subject to challenge, and therefore skepticism is a method leading to provisional conclusions.
A skeptic is one who questions the validity of a particular claim by calling for evidence to prove or disprove it.
Anecdotal and completely meaningless.I proved Energy healing to myself when My uncle got hurt in a farming accident. He was in intensive care and hooked up to all kinds of monitors. I walked up and looked at the monitors they were going nuts he was in a lot of pain so I put my hands on him and the monitors instantly quieted down and he fell asleep. When I removed my hands the monitors went nuts again and my uncle woke up.
Maybe I was slightly harsh... -ish...Not inadmissable. Simply of very low value. Indicative of directions for serious investigation to take, if such investigation is considered worthwhile.
Potential ideas for development of a protocol.
Well, just think of a way to test your abilities that doesn't rely on a patient "feeling better". Such tests seem to be based around diagnosis of conditions or detection of a living body. Anything that can give a non-subjective result.I will seriously look into that because this site is new to me I have to read up on the guidlines of the test and who knows we might get it done.
I will start by saying I am also a Skeptic and have been for a very long time so the following statment should resonate with some.
No One Can Prove Anything To Anyone About Anything Anytime You Yes You Have To Prove It To Yourself. .