aerosolben
Evil Genius
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2001
- Messages
- 2,269
And they never give it back!That's because the Jews control the money!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb3IMTJjzfo
And they never give it back!That's because the Jews control the money!
I'm sorry if I offended you. However, I do see people who view Mexican immigrants in a derogatory way whether legal or illegal. I don't agree with them. However the discrimination exists. Also I do mean immigrant:I have never seen anyone view mexican * IMMIGRANTS* this way, and I live in a border state
Perhaps like the media you are tyring to mix criminal tresspasser with immigrant?
Yes in the case of criminal tresspassing thief, "invaders" would be a good term, but immigrant? Evidence?
We are proud of our mexican heritage
Do not pollute that pride by wishing criminals upon us
Banking is surely part of the reason why the Jews became a target for the Nazis, but I don't think it explains why 6 millions of them were murdered - including women and children.
This was also a conflict between socialism and the Jewish family-fortune system. The family is less important for the individual under a socialistic ideology, because you no longer need depend on children and forefathers to be financially secure. I.e. the government keep you above waters in troublesome times despite your age and family background.
That the common German Jews (not the bankers) did so well in general compared to the "splitting" German families, was cause of envy, and a dark spot on the quality and future of socialism in Germany. Remember the Nazis were: The National Socialist German Workers Party.
You say the Germans had no one else to blame during the inflation than the Jews, I don't find this to be correct, because it was all caused in great part by the heavy demands of the reparations placed upon the Germans following their loss in World War I. So they could easily blame the winners of this war, and as you know, they also tried to obtain revenge.
The Jewish families were viewed as vampires sucking on a bleeding country because they remained above waters and traded within closed networks. And let's of course not forget the very well off, the bankers. So,Now it must sound like I hate socialism, and actually I don't. I praise the parts of socialism that carries the financial freedom and the indepence it gives the individual (compared to forced family dependence). I enjoy many things about European socialism, but I'm also aware that the family-fortune structure seems to be stronger when in competition with socialism.
- The people didn't like them from financial envy and because they had strong families and closed networks.
- The government didn't like them because the family-fortune system indirectly opposed the socialistic working class structure and made it look bad. Furthermore, the Jews didn't fit in with the pure race program the Nazis had in mind.
- There were some money to be collected for the state.
- From history, nobody seemed to like them anyway.
Read my last post in this thread on how this clash between socialism and family-fortune structures still is evident and a problem today in vast parts of Europe. Today it is just the Middle East immigrants who represent the old ways, if you like. Remember we used to have strong family dependence here in Europe, too.
Agreed. But it was those who didn't want to integrate that stole the picture from the integrated ones. This is what usually happens for immigrants world wide.I am sure there is truth to the above but there are also other facts which suggest a more complicated situation.
1. The Jews in Germany prior to the rise of Hitler seemed to have been significantly integrated into the normal German society. They served in the military and often married gentile Germans. This suggests to me that at least part of what went on was the unigue result of a ruthless, charismatic leader that played a very significant role in exacerbating any anti-semitism that existed prior to his rise to power.
Definately so. I mentioned the pure race program race briefly in my last post, but it is again a large issue, and I will now try to make it short.2. Several other groups were targetted by the Nazis for destruction. These included the Jehovah's Witnesses and the Roma (Gypsies). This suggests to me that at least part of what was going on here was that a racial purification paradiigm became established and the transgressions of a particular group were less important than the fact that they just weren't ethnically pure German by the standards of the Nazis.
I'm sorry if I offended you. However, I do see people who view Mexican immigrants in a derogatory way whether legal or illegal. I don't agree with them. However the discrimination exists. Also I do mean immigrant:
immigrant.
im·mi·grant ( P ) Pronunciation Key (m-grnt)
n.
1. A person who leaves one country to settle permanently in another.
2. A plant or animal that establishes itself in an area where it previously did not exist.
I do not wish to disrespect your Mexican heritage. However, if one moves from Mexico to live in the United States permanently, they are an immigrant. While I understand what your point, I refuse to stop using the proper term to describe someone who immigrates to this country simply because it may offend someone.
Well if we go by that then, if you ever had sex I call you a rapist
I mean, rape means to have sex with someone right? Same as to invade means to go somewhere eslse right?
Invaders and LEGAL immigrants are two different things
Wrong.
rape ( P ) Pronunciation Key (rp)
n.
1. The crime of forcing another person to submit to sex acts, especially sexual intercourse.
2. The act of seizing and carrying off by force; abduction.
3. Abusive or improper treatment; violation: a rape of justice.
I certainly agree that there is a difference between legal immigrants and illegal immigrants. However, they are both immigrants.
I certainly agree that there is a difference between cats and dogs, however they are both animals.I certainly agree that there is a difference between rape and consensual sex, however they are both intercourse
I'm sure we can keep on adding reasons for the holocaust, but I believe we got some of the most important factors on the table now.
How do you see this as a "Feel bad for the jews" thread? The discrimination of Jews is well documented. We're simply discussing the possible causes of this. If you want to start a thread asking "Why do people hate Arabs?" feel free to do so.Jews are blowing up hundreds of innocent civilians and someone has the balls to start another "Feel bad for the jews" thread?
Good grief...
How do you see this as a "Feel bad for the jews" thread? The discrimination of Jews is well documented. We're simply discussing the possible causes of this. If you want to start a thread asking "Why do people hate Arabs?" feel free to do so.
Jews are blowing up hundreds of innocent civilians...
That's a fairly bold claim. Do you have any evidence to support your theory?There are dozens of threads about discrimination against the jews.
This thread was simply started at this particular time because the Jews are killing so many people. The thread starter just wants the attention taken away from the fact the jews are murdering hundreds of people and wants people to remember jews are discriminated against.
"People of the jury, The defendant may of brutally killed that whole family..But don't forget he was made fun of as a child!"
Can you say "Red herring"?
This thread was simply started at this particular time because the Jews are killing so many people. The thread starter just wants the attention taken away from the fact the jews are murdering hundreds of people and wants people to remember jews are discriminated against.
That is a false statement.
The government of the State of Israel, which represents many different segments of a multi-cultural and multi-religious society, has instructed their Defense Forces, whose members encompass Muslims, Jews, Christians and other religions, to act to stop unprovoked missile attacks upon the citizens of the State, by islamic terrorists who operate from within civilian areas of gaza and Lebanon.
So, Dustin, it is not "jews" who are acting as a group, it is Israelis of many different religious persuasions in the IDF; and they are not "blowing up" hundreds of innocent civilians -- the civilians are collateral to the IDF blowing up the terrorists who are illegally using these civilians for cover.
That has been repeatedly pointed out in various threads, and it seems highly unlikely that you missed that basic explanation being given over and over here on JREF Forums....
However, for your edification:
The IDF said it had warned residents of Qana to leave and that Hezbollah bore responsibility for using the town center as a base of operations to fire rockets at Israel.
PM Olmert confirmed that he has seen video evidence (taken from IAF observation drones) that Qana was used as a Hezbollah base for launching hundreds of rockets at Israel.
That's a fairly bold claim. Do you have any evidence to support your theory?
That is a false statement.
The government of the State of Israel, which represents many different segments of a multi-cultural and multi-religious society, has instructed their Defense Forces, whose members encompass Muslims, Jews, Christians and other religions, to act to stop unprovoked missile attacks upon the citizens of the State, by islamic terrorists who operate from within civilian areas of gaza and Lebanon.
So, Dustin, it is not "jews" who are acting as a group, it is Israelis of many different religious persuasions in the IDF; and they are not "blowing up" hundreds of innocent civilians -- the civilians are collateral to the IDF blowing up the terrorists who are illegally using these civilians for cover.
The International comitty has repeatedly asked for a cease-fire. Someone should stand down, one must have the courage to do the first move. Of course Hizbollah, by it's nature, will never do that, so it's up to Israel.