Christophera, I want to be very sure I understand all the ramifications of your supposition, so please correct me if I am wrong in any of the particulars below.
1. The World Trade Centers were built with Concrete Cores, despite there being no record of that much concrete being ordered, no sign of the massive molds (wrong word but I've pulled a blank) that would have had to hold the settling concrete and no record of any of the hundreds of workers who would have been repsonsible for the building of the Core.
2. Inside the Concrete core was 3" rebar at 48" diameter, which is a unique and possibly one-of-a-kind rebar at distances that engineers (at least those on this site) believe are not practical.
3. On that unique rebar was a coat of C4-type explosive that was covered by the concrete during the pour, but retained it's explosive potential. This despite there being no record of the hypothetical Rebar being diverted to a location for application of the C4-type explosives.
4. At the same time the builders were welding 1300-ft steel columns on the outside of the Concrete core, while also planting explosive charges in such precise locations as to sever the steel whenever necessary.
5. Let sit for approximately 30 years.
6. Sometime prior to but near 9-11, the entire two buildings are primed and wired for detonation without the thousands of workers and scores of security being aware in the slightest of the massive work and wiring necessary.
7. Detonations are made that are powerful enough not only to sever steel but to pulverize the entire concrete core and lead to collapse of the building.
Is this accurate, Chris? I want to be sure I am following you here.
Uh huh, and I'm sure when this guy went back to his job driving a truck he was very proud of his comment.
BTW, Apollyon; don't be hard on truckers; we have a pretty smart truck driver ourselves-name of Roadtoad, you might have read a post or two of his. So be nice to truck drivers...
