shemp
a flimsy character...perfidious and despised
If expense is important to them, why don't they just beat the condemned to death with a big stick?
If expense is important to them, why don't they just beat the condemned to death with a big stick?
Well, it started with Anti_Hypeman. The first question is: how many people who posted in disgust are also death penalty advocates? BPSCG then made the meat eating and slaughterhouse analogies. I read that as a counter to AH's post, not as a sober recrimination of meat eaters. If so my next question is: does BPSCG take the eating of meat as a means to justify execution vans?![]()
In the same way that vegetarians get around this thorny issue (I'm not a veggie), being against the death penalty (everywhere) gets around choosing one style over another. Would it be much different if we could humanely zap them out of existence?
edit: typos
I'll invoke Godwin and say that if the Nazis had drawn and quartered the first 3 million and then gassed the next 3 million, I wouldn't have blinked when they decided to start using gas. For me the horror is that 6 million died.
It would damage the organs they don't harvest.If expense is important to them, why don't they just beat the condemned to death with a big stick?
Dut isn't the repulsive bit the death, rather than the method?How about those who object to the death penalty, both in China and the United States?
Are we allowed to find these vans repulsive, without being hypocritical?
![]()
Lethal injection is quicker than a bullet to the head? I don't think so.Makers of the death vans say the vehicles and injections are a civilized alternative to the firing squad, ending the life of the condemned more quickly, clinically and safely.
Dut isn't the repulsive bit the death, rather than the method?
but in that case it's about the level of suffering of the condemned.True enough, but there are degrees. For example, no matter what your opinion on the death penalty, I think everyone would be just a wee bit more horrified by a mideval England Braveheart-style "FREEEEEDDDOOOM" death than we would, say, lethal injection.
Considering that they are killing people who are likely unfit to live in your average society to begin with, what's wrong with taking those people's organs, as well? It's not like the dead are going to need them.
Since we've already Godwined...
One of the early attempts by the Nazis at mass slaughter was to use trucks. They herded the people into the air-tight cargo area, telling them they were going for work detail. The exhaust from the truck was piped into the cargo area; by the time the truck arrived at the mass grave, everyone in the back was dead.
Maybe that's part of my horror at the idea of a "mobile death chamber."
yeah, train wrecks are cool!You know what would be cool? If, just as they prepare the execution, the bus smashes into a train as they cross railroad tracks and the only one to survive is the prisoner because he's tied down so securely.
Its a great point. Given China's history of human rights protection, rule of law, democratic systems, checks and balances and idipendent judiciary, we clearly should give them the benefit of the doubt. Certainly, everyone China would sentence to death likely deserves it...if the people don't like it, they can certainly petition the government, write to newspapers, publish books, petition their legislators, sue the government...that is what makes living in a democracy so great.
It's convenient for the criminal."I'm most proud of the bed. It's very humane, like an ambulance," Kang says. He points to the power-driven metal stretcher that glides out at an incline. "It's too brutal to haul a person aboard," he says. "This makes it convenient for the criminal and the guards."
Its funny how death penalty advocates are only in favor of it if they dont have to see it.
If expense is important to them, why don't they just beat the condemned to death with a big stick?