Pentagon releases AA77 video

100% of Loosers will declare 'It must be faked'

80% of Loosers will declare themselves to be image experts 3 minutes after the video is released.

75% of Loosers will claim that their experience with Photoshop Elements lets them dectect anomolies in a security camera.

60% of Loosers will complain that these are not the videos they wanted.

90% of Loosers Will claim they are going to march on Washington to get the 'real videos'.

1% of Loosers will actully get out of their chair, the remainder will complain about satellite spies being able to spot you easier if you move.

EDit to add: 88% will blame Judicial Watch for altering the video since they are a conservative (and thus obviously NEO_CONS) group.

I predict the first reaction will be that the plane in the video is not a Boeing 757.
 
Watching on Sky News now.Cannot see anything resembling a plane.Looks just like existing time frame stills previously seen.
 
Last edited:
Watching on Sky News now.Cannot see anything resembling a plane.Looks just like existing time frame stills previously seen.

Are you sure its the new video? CNN played stock footage during its report in the link I gave above.
 
CNN still saying "we'll play it when we get it". One expert just on was saying that there is no doubt that a plane hit the Pentagon, for [list of reasons], but that some people just don't want to hear that. I wonder who he could be talking about.
 
They've showed it on Fox several times. Two different angles. Multiple frames, each frame 0.5 sec apart.

It doesn't show anything that's recognizable as an aircraft. Supposedly there is an artefact at the far right edge of one frame that someone at the Pentagon has identified as the nose of the aircraft. They showed the still briefly on Fox, and it looks like a smudge. Very hard to make out, at least on my 27-inch TV.

Underwhelming, and not likely to discourage any of the woo. Probably make it worse.
 
I agree,its playing into the hands of woo.Where's the video footage the feds took from the nearby hotel?
Im no Looser BTW just saying it shows nothing not seen already.Neither does it show anything remotely looking like a plane.
 
where have you guys seen this? ive had my tv on cnn and they said they're going to show it as soon as its available. the video they've been showing is the old video.
 
where have you guys seen this? ive had my tv on cnn and they said they're going to show it as soon as its available. the video they've been showing is the old video.

The new video looks very much lke the old. The way to identify between the two is the lack of a auto gate in the direct foreground of the new video.
 
Update from the last link I posted:

UPDATE #2: MSNBC's Pete Williams is reporting that the newly released video is a series of frames that are similar to some previously released video frames showing a fireball exploding on a exterior wall of the Pentagon. The new video frames show the same fireball exploding from a different angle. It supposedly only shows "the tip of the plane which may not be enough to satisfy the conspiracy theorist," says Williams.
 
where have you guys seen this? ive had my tv on cnn and they said they're going to show it as soon as its available. the video they've been showing is the old video.

Fox has shown it a couple of times. It's underwhelming, though, so they've moved on to other coverage. They embarassed themselves pretty badly -- their Pentagon correspondent Brett Baier was claiming before the video was released, that he had seen it, and that the nose of the aircraft was clearly visible. Then they rolled the frames, and there was no such thing. You might be able to see the nose -- but if you can, it certainly isn't clearly visible.
 
I think others have mentioned this before, but doesn't it seem like the U.S. government is it's own worst enemy when dealing with these 9/11 conspiracy claims? If they have clear video evidence of a plane striking the Pentagon, why not release it or at least some still frames of it? By not doing so, they play into the hands of the conspiracy crowd.

Granted, there may be logical reasons that prohibit them from releasing such evidence, but, assuming there aren't, why not squash the conspiracy bug?
 
I think others have mentioned this before, but doesn't it seem like the U.S. government is it's own worst enemy when dealing with these 9/11 conspiracy claims? If they have clear video evidence of a plane striking the Pentagon, why not release it or at least some still frames of it? By not doing so, they play into the hands of the conspiracy crowd.

Granted, there may be logical reasons that prohibit them from releasing such evidence, but, assuming there aren't, why not squash the conspiracy bug?

the camera took one frame every 1/2 second. If the government had clear 24 or 30 fps video I'm sure they'd gladly release it.

to the conspiracy theorists...there are dozens of witnesses of different political leanings who witnessed a plane hitting the pentagon. Are there any people willing to testify under oath that they were there and it was a rocket?
 

Back
Top Bottom