A response to me from one "Geoff Kait"

jj

Penultimate Amazing
J
Joined
Oct 11, 2001
Messages
21,382
Last edited:
Yup, that's pretty lame, Darat. Sounds like somebody didn't like being told to behave.
 
The audioasylum links are now not working jj, what did they say?

I read the machinadynamica link (or skimmed it), and all I can say is, I'm glad someone has finally found a practical application for quantum entanglement!
 
On behalf of people with degrees in aeronautical engineering, I'd like to apologise for this person. We're sorry. We're really really sorry.
 
Things like this make you believe in justifiable homicide.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Intelligent Cow Chip Fertilizer, yes now you farmers no later have to go out into the fields to fling you cow chips, our Intelligent Cow Chip Fertilizer will fling it for you. Using the latest BS on the market, buy our Intelligent Cow Chip Fertilizer now.

Paul

:) :) :)

Made by IDer's of the world.
 
CurtC said:
The audioasylum links are now not working jj, what did they say?

I read the machinadynamica link (or skimmed it), and all I can say is, I'm glad someone has finally found a practical application for quantum entanglement!
Click to expand...

The links asserted, perhaps seriously, perhaps as an attempt at guilt by association that I was Kramer, and that we wore "white sheets". There was some suggestion that JREF was somehow an organization associated with "white sheets".

The moderation at the asylum appears to have removed his comments, unfortunately, perhaps, bercause I think they were a wonderful demonstration of what kind of malice some people just exude.
 
Poor Geoff has had his ego bruised. His concerted efforts at an explanantion of how the "intelligent chip" might work were greeted with no more than polite laughter.
 
Gr8wight said:
Poor Geoff has had his ego bruised. His concerted efforts at an explanantion of how the "intelligent chip" might work were greeted with no more than polite laughter.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, I don't understand. Why was it polite? It should have been large guffaws.
 
TjW said:
I'm sorry, I don't understand. Why was it polite? It should have been large guffaws.
Click to expand...

I was thinking of the way one softly chuckles at a child's earnest but totally outrageous tales.
 
Audiophile using so-called Common Sense, "There must be audio differences in cable, in a DBT no differences where heard, Therefore DBT are invalid".

Scientist using a Reality-Check, "No audio differences were heard in the DBT, Therefore there are no audio differences in cables".

Paul

:) :) :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom