• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Sent in my application today.

chillzero said:
Being charitable, I'd say the guy has a major first-time crush on someone independant and unattainable. Being cynical, I'd say he's having a laugh here and making it all up.
Click to expand...
An operational application log would sort that out to some degree. At least it would be clear whether an actual application has been sent or not.

So pretty please with sugar on top: Can we get KRAMER MkII hired and working ASAP? Or at least a hint about when that might happen?
 
Neutralize said:
OK to answer a few questions, yes we have tested this ability. As I said we play hide and seek in the middle of the night. She will let me know where to find her and I'll go look. Whenever I look into her eyes I like hyperventalate and everything looks like Stark Trek when they go into warp speed. She often visits my back yard at night and knocks on my walls etc. to tease me.
Click to expand...
Dude, ask her out. It's spring-time!

Good luck with it all. :blush:
 
I try not to be too harsh. Many (potential) applicants are reluctant to actually carry out tests, because they'd really LIKE it to be true, and the only thing that would force them to abandon it would be tests that demonstrate it is not.

To such a person, a sensation that someone is eating tuna is interesting and perhaps even worthy of communicating to others. To a skeptic, it's pointless waste of time to even mention it, unless it can be shown that the person was ACTUALLY eating tuna at the time. To the skeptic, any further communication without relavent data is simply restating the unsupported assumption again.

Now, such people sometimes begin to understand this, and a meaningful discussion can then occur. Others are unwilling to understand this view, and then continue on without ever making an effort to understand, continually adding uninteresting information.

Any bets on which direction it'll go from here?
 
GzuzKryzt said:
At what odds? ;)
Click to expand...

I dunno, he seems somewhat grounded, in that he's not not inventing any crazy ideas to explain how such an ability actually works. The ability to accept that it could be beyond understanding is at least a more reasonable position than adding theories about ghosts, imaginary scientific particles, fairies, etc. I'd think there'd be some people that could believe me might be shown the proper way to explore it in a meaningful way.

Say 1 to 3 on either side, the house always has the edge ;P
 
Neutralize, when you talk to this girl in person about the psychic connection (and I do have to specify when you talk to her with your mouth, not just your mind), does she acknowledge that it exists? You've said before that she is dishonest, does part of this dishonesty extend to saying that there is no connection?
 
Just what I was going to ask. So there is no point in my post. Ah well.

Lamuella said:
Neutralize, when you talk to this girl in person about the psychic connection (and I do have to specify when you talk to her with your mouth, not just your mind), does she acknowledge that it exists? You've said before that she is dishonest, does part of this dishonesty extend to saying that there is no connection?
Click to expand...

... or to saying that no, she wasn't in the park just out of sight, or tapping on your wall at night.

Neutralize, what you described could be psychic, or could be examples of fairly common psychosis-like symptoms; your doctor might have something to say about it?

I know you mentioned something about a priest who's also a psychiatrist, but if I were you I'd visit a doctor to whom you are a patient, not a parishioner, and tell him the whole story. Maybe even show him this thread.

Because indeed you may be psychic, but the other possibility (which doesn't necessarily rule out the first) might need attention?
 
Well, I can only go by my own personal experience. I am VERY good at quoting lines from This Is Spinal Tap. I reckon that, if you were to throw me a random line from the film, I could tell you the line that follows it at least 90% of the time. Even the obscure and mumbled ones. I've never tested this, but I'm pretty sure I could do it.

But offer me a million dollars to demonstrate this feat? What sort of mug do you take me for? I dont need to prove myself to you!
 
Morrigan said:
$10 this "friend" is the imaginary product of a schizophrenic mind....
Click to expand...
For my money, the friend exists, and is indeed vaguely aware of her admirer. But doesn't rap on his wall in the night.

But I just wish Notarize would come back to tell us what's going on.

Edit: I mean Neutralize - strange Freudian slip there :D

Also, I meant to add - Neutralize, even if this stuff is more a product of some strange psychological phenomena than psychic phenomena, doesn't mean it's necessarily a huge amount to worry about - often just a normal part of growing up. Get yourself checked out anyway though, is what I'd do.
 
Last edited:
TheBoyPaj said:
Well, I can only go by my own personal experience. I am VERY good at quoting lines from This Is Spinal Tap...
Click to expand...

How did this get here? I definitely used the reply function at the bottom of the "A million dollars isn't much" thread. It just looks stupid on this page.
 
I just came back from work to check if you posted something, Neutralize, after viewing the thread this morning. (GMT +1)

Perhaps you simply should disregard the posters donning medical gowns. Although they probably mean well though they act, well, mean.

Because I'd like to hear your take on our claim-related inquiries.
 
Been almost three days since we heard from her. Do you think she has fled the forum? Her mother may have found out what she has been doing.
 
Neutralize said:
I wasn't certain she was there because sometimes she's not honest.
Click to expand...

Anyone else notice that? Sometimes during these telepathy sessions she's "not honest". So some of these times she sends him a message telling him to meet her somewhere, she's not there! That c***.

Furthermore, she doesn't seem to pay that much attention to him when they meet in public, he's characterized the relationship as not extending much past the psychic level, and when she's "not honest" it's when they meet in public, never late at night when she happens to show up in some random city block at the same time as him. That coupled with his ability to know exactly what she's eating, and I wonder if the entire relationaship is just in his head. He could just be having dreams about playing hide and go seek, or they could be a psychocitic episode.

Edit:
Neutralize, when you talk to this girl in person about the psychic connection.....
Click to expand...

oh, I guess someone did beat me to it
 
rjh01 -- why refer to neutralize as 'her' ?

In light of the new announcement by the JREF, it seems that this "applicant" will very soon be discovered to have not sent in a proper application, I predict.
 
Female? Maybe. See post 51, 52. Her friend has a uterus. Post 100 says she got all dressed up. I do admit there is nothing conclusive.

What does worry me is post 51
... we only talked like three times at school ... We sometimes run sround playing hide and seek in the middle of the night.
Click to expand...
If they sometimes run around in the middle of the night they should have talked more than three times. Something is fishy about the post.

4 days and no word from her. Any point in continuing this thread?
 
rjh01 said:
...
4 days and no word from her. Any point in continuing this thread?
Click to expand...

You mean besides you posting the end, Mr. Thread Ender? ;)



We may hear back from Neutralize. Also, we will probably see soon who did not send an application and actually did.
This will of course not put an end to conjectures but it will shed some light on Neutralize's application.
 
Morrigan said:
$10 this "friend" is the imaginary product of a schizophrenic mind....
Click to expand...
Oh thank dog. I was beginning to wonder why no one had mentioned the obvious.

The other alternative is that the girl is real, but the relationship is imaginary. This is kind of scary. Having fantasies about a girl is one thing; discussing those fantasies as if they were real on a public message board is another step towards scary.

The third alternative - well, let's be honest. There is no third alternative.


Rjoh1 - I think it the evidence is that Neutralize is male. Why would a female think it was interesting to mention that she could feel another girl's utereus (how would she tell it from her own, anyway)? Instead, that comment was meant to show how close their relationship was - that even as a man, he could feel her femaleness. That's my guess.
 
Yahzi said:
Rjoh1 - I think it the evidence is that Neutralize is male. Why would a female think it was interesting to mention that she could feel another girl's utereus (how would she tell it from her own, anyway)? Instead, that comment was meant to show how close their relationship was - that even as a man, he could feel her femaleness. That's my guess.
Click to expand...

You think either interpretation actually makes sense?

How would a man know that it's an uterus he's feeling? :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom