What you'll never get from the "9-11 Truth Movement"

Nice post Sultanist. You also managed to tease out one of the dumbest resposes I've seen so far. LondonEye seems to think his video proves his point, and not yours!

Edit: you probably shouldn't have said anything about the links. they wouldn't have clicked them anyway.
 
Shrinker said:
Nice post Sultanist. You also managed to tease out one of the dumbest resposes I've seen so far. LondonEye seems to think his video proves his point, and not yours!

Edit: you probably shouldn't have said anything about the links. they wouldn't have clicked them anyway.
Click to expand...

There's a method to my madness. I've "conspired" it to go down this way...

1. I post with the links not working.
2. Because of that they all predictably start thrashing around like headless chickens and tell me I'm a moron because my non-working links prove that to be the case.
3. Then after a page or two of their ranting and raving, the links start working
again.
4. I point out the links were valid all along taking all the wind out of their sails.
5. The "Truth Movement" then dies a quick death and we can then say "pull it" to the whole fricking thing.

We'll see if that's how it goes down. :D
 
Last edited:
CptColumbo said:
They sometimes read things on this site, so the cat (no pun intended) might be out of the bag.
Click to expand...
I wonder if they really do. I know they comment about what's on the front page, but do they actually read any comments? I mean, judging by the responses so far they've not even read Sultanists posts on their own forum.

One guys just posted a link about the pentagon, in response to detailed points about WTC7.
 
Shrinker said:
I wonder if they really do. I know they comment about what's on the front page, but do they actually read any comments? I mean, judging by the responses so far they've not even read Sultanists posts on their own forum.

One guys just posted a link about the pentagon, in response to detailed points about WTC7.
Click to expand...
If they're a late commer to the Loose Change thread I envy the person who reads the whole thing, but since geggy repeats himself/herself it's really not necessary.
 
I'm convinced they'd only read geggy's posts anyway and go away thinking he's doing a fine job.

Honestly these idiots make me seethe so much, especially after seeing the utterly braindead responses Sultanist is getting. I mean what kind of half blind knuckle dragging moron would post those completely irrelevant links. Do they assign all their links to their function keys and press a bunch at random whenever they see something they don't like?!
 
Well, TheQuest has already said he's going to move your thread:
TheQuest said:
So what does this mean exactly, then?

That 911 was not an inside job?

And the thread title, we are hiding your 'information' on WTC7?

And your 'sources'. The New York Times? Are you kidding me? The Times still wants you to believe that JFK was killed in a hunting accident.
biggrin.gif


Sultanist, I am sorry indeed. Your are correct. There is another place for you to bring this up. Try the the New York Times, World Net Dailey or the Drudge Report.
Crylol.gif


I'll leave this thread here for a bit more and then it's going to the bit bucket.
thumbdown.gif
Click to expand...
What a bunch of pathetic cowards they have over there.
 
Sultanist said:
We'll see if that's how it goes down. :D
Click to expand...

Well the best laid plans of mice and men. :D

In the words of William Bendix, "what a revoltin development".

Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright.
The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light.
And, somewhere men are laughing, and little children shout,
but there is no joy outside the insane asylum, because mighty Sultanist
has struck out.

:D
 
Stupid newbie question, I have checked FAQ and googled it but just can't figure out what "woo" stands for. Anyone take pity on me to save my arthritic fingers?
 
milesalpha said:
Stupid newbie question, I have checked FAQ and googled it but just can't figure out what "woo" stands for. Anyone take pity on me to save my arthritic fingers?
Click to expand...
A woo is someone who believes ridiculous things for which there is no evidence. So we have 9/11 conspiracy woos, psychic woos, space alien abductee woos, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom