Loose Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
chipmunk stew said:
It will be fun to see how they handle this.
Click to expand...

They moved the thread into the "lounge" area, out of the 9/11 discussion area.

;)

Really, other kooks do a better job of making the Loosers look ridiculous than we do. They put real effort into making equally spurious graphics and arguments. There's no better illustration of just how confused and silly the 9/11 CT community is.
 
Kevin_Lowe said:
They moved the thread into the "lounge" area, out of the 9/11 discussion area.
Click to expand...

Wow, Kevin Lowe is in this forum!:)

The CTs really don't want a debate, let alone the Truth, they only want to masterbate to their ideas.

And geggy, please respond to my previous post. The first step into recovering from mind manipulation is acknowledging that you have a problem.
 
geggy when you make statements like:

I don't think you realize how truly dangerous the bush cronies are. They have no regards for human lives.
Click to expand...

it really makes me wonder. now, i'm no fan of the bush administration and im sure mot of the people on this board aren't but you are too quick to assume that because he is a prick he must have planned 9/11

i got a counter-proposal for you geggy. If the bush cronies are so evil and this government is really keeping you down i'm sure you can get some cheap real estate in darfur. go live there for a week and complain to the locals about how bad our government is, i'm sure they'll feel your pain.
 
geggy said:
Belz...
Take a look...

You can clearly see the squibs ejecting.
Click to expand...

I don't know if you've ever seen a controlled demo, but they don't blow small, isolated charges like the one you claim this is. They do it in waves. BEFORE The collapse.

Isn't it likely that something on that particular floor gave way and ejected air to the outside ? After all, the building WAS already collapsing at that point, as we can see in the picture.

The ejection of the second squib in the picture is far below the collapsing area of the tower.
Click to expand...

"Far" below ?

In an event of controlled demo, squibs eject out of buildings at the same time to allow the building to free fall.
Click to expand...

Perhaps someone can correct me on this, but I don't think I'd want a controlled demo to reach free fall. Otherwise how do you control the demo ??

Squibs ejected out of the wtc tower and the top followed through. The tower couldn't have possibly came down without stripping and cutting of the core to weaken the structure of the building unless explosives were preplanted.
Click to expand...

Exactly, which PRECLUDES your theory, because someone would have noticed the operation.

In the area of the puff of smoke ejection did not appear to be damaged. There were no signs of trusses giving away, otherwise the cracks of the concrete of the tower would be clearly visible.
Click to expand...

From THAT distance ? You gotta be kidding.

The only logical explanation for this is that squibs were making a clean cut through the concrete of the towers.
Click to expand...

I think you want to freshen up on your logic courses.

ETA: Spelling.
 
Last edited:
CptColumbo said:
In regards to the relationship of the Chertoffs a person at this thread:

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=682

writes:


I e-mailed Benjamin Chertoff again to get a comment, his reply:



I'll try to get a hold of Michael Chertoff, but I think that might take awhile.
Click to expand...

Interesting stuff, and another 911 CT myth goes down the drain.

I can sympathize with Chertoff, my own last name isn't very common and it is quite argueable that everyone in the US with my last name is a 'cousin'. The question is: how many times removed? In many cases the relationship splits back in the early 18th century. But my Dad still kids with a fellow in the same city with the same last name from the other family by calling him 'cuz' and such.
 
Obviously, 9/11 affected all of us prodoundly, almost like a trauma. I don't think the sane way to deal with it is to watch over and over again these images and look for minute details that might suggest something is not right. LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE, the entire 9/11 day isn't right, it's a day of infamy! Deal with it!
 
This has been asked before, but I'm posting again to see if geggy wants to address it this time around:

Geggy, why do you think the "evil" government you claim had no qualms about murdering thousands of civilians is allowing you and your looser friends to continue to expose its nefarious deeds without any negative effects whatsoever?

eta: "its"
 
Last edited:
shuize said:
This has been asked before, but I'm posting again to see if geggy wants to address it this time around:

Geggy, why do you think the "evil" government you claim had no qualms about murdering thousands of civilians is allowing you and your looser friends to continue to expose it's nefarious deeds without any negative effects whatsoever?
Click to expand...
Forget it shuize, he only responds when someone else has already written an answer he can paraphrase, quote or link to.

ETA good question tho...
 
And Belz has posted alot of unanswered questions as well. They go about like this...

If the gov staged the terrorist attack:
-Why would they make it look like a controlled demolition?
-If they used explosives, why didn't they just plant a bomb and blame it on the terrorists, why add the planes?

geggy has alot of catching up to do.
 
Pardalis said:
And Belz has posted alot of unanswered questions as well. They go about like this...

If the gov staged the terrorist attack:
-Why would they make it look like a controlled demolition?
-If they used explosives, why didn't they just plant a bomb and blame it on the terrorists, why add the planes?

geggy has alot of catching up to do.
Click to expand...

Why didn't they use WMD? Would have made the whole Iraq thing a little easier to swallow...
 
Pardalis said:
And Belz has posted alot of unanswered questions as well. They go about like this...

If the gov staged the terrorist attack:
-Why would they make it look like a controlled demolition?
-If they used explosives, why didn't they just plant a bomb and blame it on the terrorists, why add the planes?

geggy has alot of catching up to do.
Click to expand...
and for the 100thtime...
How else would it look?
The laws of physics and rules of structural design can't have it any other way!
That is the way things work.
 
The WMD thing ties in perfect with the briefcase nuke theory...

If a briefcase nuke was used, why the ^#$% would you keep it quiet? There's enough proof of WMDs right there for most Americans, would have added a lot of credibility (of course, you'd also, as others pointed out, want Iraqi terrorists).

There's too many things in the CT version that don't make sense, or are contradictory. There'd have to be two or three different conspiracies, each doing a different part of the action, all planning the same things on the same day without any of them knowing of the other. Like I said before, it's not so much a "theory" as a "loose collection of unrelated hypotheses".
 
geggy said:
I aplogize for the error. Sometime the internet provider on my tmobile sidekick can get screwy. I think I'mn being spied on. Not being paranoid, I have nothing to hide. Theyre the ones who are being paranoid. heh
Click to expand...

Can't you see there is something wrong in your way of thinking?

This is lucid thinking:
geggy said:
Sometime the internet provider on my tmobile sidekick can get screwy.
Click to expand...

This is not:
geggy said:
I think I'mn being spied on.
Click to expand...

The worrying thing about it that they both are from the same post. There's nothing more scary than watching a sane person become insane "Live".
 
Pardalis said:
And as someone else pointed out earlier, why were the highjackers Saudis and not Iraqis?
Click to expand...

The only explanation I can think of, from a completely objective point of view, is that the mistakes made by the gubbmint during the operation are either:

A) made by people on the inside who wanted the truth to come out.

or

B) purposely made by the EEeeevil gubbmit in order to seed dissent and chaos... or whatnot.
 
Why hit the Pentagon in addition to the WTC? Did "they" think the public wouldn't be in favor of the War On Terror without that last little cherry on top?
 
Reminds me of Randy Quaid in The Paper.

When asked:
"When did you become so paranoid?"
He says:
"When everyone started plotting against me."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom