Hindmost
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 3,307
The point in the second link about extracurricular activities is most certainly legit. I could have never made the sports teams in a larger school, but was good enough to be a 4-sport letterman in my high school.
However, there is likely a flaw in the first link
This aspect is pretty much meaningless, as it is probably an example of a single-ended observation. Things like tardiness and absenteeism are more noticable than arriving at time and attending, and so they get noticed. The larger schools will have more instances of absenteeism and tardiness, but it's not clear that it will necessarily be more prevelent when size of the classes are taken into account. More importantly, the teachers' reporting that they are a problem provides little insight into the question, because it is subject to bias. Not saying it's not a problem, just that the teachers' impression of whether it is a problem or not is not very useful for comparison.
In some cases in my school, we don't have enough students to fill a roster. It can depend on the coach and if the students have a favorable opinion.
The above point in the second link deals with the perception by teachers...so I believe they were indicating a more negative attitude about students in the larger schools. I agree that correlation doesn't indicate causation.
glenn