delphi_ote
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2005
- Messages
- 5,994
Here's what TheQuest is proposing--"Wisdom Of Allowing Trolls To Overstay Visit":
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=2071





Keep 'em in line, TheQuest.
Here's what TheQuest is proposing--"Wisdom Of Allowing Trolls To Overstay Visit":
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=2071





From Nabisco!Conspiranazis.
Gravy, and the rest you who are doing battle in another place - regarding Aluminium/Aluminum:-
Remembering vaguely some stuff from the Falklands War (HMS Sheffield etc) I did a bit of Googling and found the site of the Aluminium Federation here in the UK. In particular this page on 'Aluminium and Fire' has a very interesting picture of a burnt-out car which graphically illustrates the difference between the melting points of steel and aluminium alloys.
btw - you're doing great, I'm sure it makes a difference to the fence sitters and lurkers.
Dylan Avery wrote:
Oh, and did you miss this notice on our front page?
"We will gladly send a free DVD to anybody who lost friends or family on September 11th, 2001"
Excellent link, Dragon! I now have it bookmarked for posterity. Thanks very much.
I agree with you about the fence-sitters and lurkers.
It seems the types of people believing those claims generally swallow what they read whole, no questions asked. At least if they are presented with evidence that contradicts those claims at the site they read regularly, they may be forced to weigh up the information.
But it's a FREE DVD! Those things make great coasters and frisbees! When you really think about it in the big scheme of things, those families are actually pretty lucky! The rest of us have to go all the way to Google Video and type in two words to find a free copy of this outstanding film."We will gladly defecate on your memories and the graves of your friends or family."
There's a good quote from someone who handled plane and body parts here: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=yI'm in a debate about this stuff at another forum, and the CTer continually refers to LC. I am unable to download or view it on the PC I use at home, so am unable to check the claims of the 'manufacturers' that 'prove' the wheel and engine parts found at the Pentagon are not those of a 757.
I've asked for names, positions, and locations of these 'manufacturers', but I'm not having much luck.
(This is someone who believes a 757 did not hit the Pentagon, but he:
admits he doesn't know what happened to the plane full of passengers,
admits he doesn't know how a wheel and engine parts got into the debris,
and is close to admitting Mari-Rae Sopper not die as a result of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, despite her being on the plane and her remains having been identified in the debris...)
![]()
Aluminium, mmmmm, the metal that melts in your mouth but not in your hand!I find Dragon's abuse of aluminum deleterious to the feng shui of this board. You are banished, Dragon. Begone!
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1765&st=150Pablo on the Loose Change forum said:I agree. Being banned for "less than honest debate" has got to be one of the strangest reasons I've ever heard. Imagine the furore that would have been created if this reason had been given on a pro-government forum.No wonder he's making some people here feel very uncomfortable.
You can close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, and hum really loud, but if you choose to simply ignore people like Gravy, you are deluding yourself. Ultimately, this movement will have to stand and face people like Gravy
Anyone with an ounce of objectivity here knows exactly why Gravy was banned.
Actually what is "less than honest debate". He can only debate if others respond to his posts can't he? Are you now saying you dictate what can and can't be discussed? And why ban Gravy rather than the people who were also part of the debate? From this I take it to mean that "less than honest debate" means that anyone who takes part in a debate who doesn't already believe that 9/11 was a government conspiracy will get banned.
The Loose Change video will get more people interested and asking questions, but as soon as they do any more in depth research and start looking at these kind of forums the majority of people will run a mile.
I also see a thread dicussing the banning of Gravy seems to have disappeared too. Cover-up?
I came here as someone open to any possibility, but what I've seen has made me think this "truth" has no credibility whatsoever. I started off by asking some questions which I didn't understand, got some answers but also some patronising and hostile replies. Now I just come here for entertainment. The thread showing the in-fighting between different 9/11 truth camps is hilarious.
I don't understand what is meant by a poster taking up too much of your time either, how is someone posting taking up too much time? You just want people to hear what you have to say and agree without questioning you? If someone is taking up too much of your time, why don't you just let others debate with him and you do something else with your time.
For entertainment purposes this site is good, and quite eye-opening too (not necessarily for the reasons some would hope for). I can understand how people can become what they are fighting against by reading this.
There's a good quote from someone who handled plane and body parts here: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=y
Another good general 9/11 debunking site with links to Pentagon photos is http://www.911myths.com The wheel rim comparison is particularly telling.
Well I'll be damned, they sure fooled me. They weren't as predictable as I thought. They're back to claiming that the building should have fallen over like a tree. Even I never could have predicted anything as assinine as that.Believe me, the response will be as predictable as the sun rising. I could almost write their script right now.![]()