• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Israel

JOEBIALEK

New Blood
J
Joined
Jun 16, 2005
Messages
19
In a recent publication of U.S. News and World Report, David Gergen wrote an editorial titled "An Unfair Attack". In the article he issues a rebuttal to an article written by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walttitles {"The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy"}. Gergen states the following: "In essence, their 82-page piece argues that U.S. policy in the Middle East has been hijacked by a pro-Israel "Lobby." "The core of the Lobby," they say, "is comprised of American Jews who make a significant effort in their daily lives to bend U.S. foreign policy so that it advances Israel's interests." As a result, "the United States has a terrorism problem in good part because it is so closely allied with Israel." I agree with Mearsheimer and Walttitles.
Click to expand...

http://www.e-thepeople.org/article/52236/view?viewtype=
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JOEBIALEK said:
In a recent publication of U.S. News and World Report, David Gergen wrote an editorial titled "An Unfair Attack". In the article he issues a rebuttal to an article written by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walttitles {"The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy"}. Gergen states the following: "In essence, their 82-page piece argues that U.S. policy in the Middle East has been hijacked by a pro-Israel "Lobby." "The core of the Lobby," they say, "is comprised of American Jews who make a significant effort in their daily lives to bend U.S. foreign policy so that it advances Israel's interests." As a result, "the United States has a terrorism problem in good part because it is so closely allied with Israel." I agree with Mearsheimer and Walttitles.
Click to expand...

Stormfront?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I always love these threads, it's fantastic when the whole of the PCESI forum gets together to demolish an anti-Semitic troll.
Carry on.
 
JOEBIALEK is usually posting exactly the same on five to ten different boards (probably steals some comments somewhere else), then never discusses in his own threads except for a "good post" or two. (I'm claiming the million if he does it again.)
 
Is he the guy that started the JFK thread and left? I can't believe I wasted my sniper kitty picture on that guy...

ETA: It is the same guy!!! I'll bet he follows up with "good points..."
 
Last edited:
As I said to another neo-Nazi troll:

!גיי קאַק אויפֿן יאַם
 
bob_kark said:
Is he the guy that started the JFK thread and left? I can't believe I wasted my sniper kitty picture on that guy...

ETA: It is the same guy!!! I'll bet he follows up with "good points..."
Click to expand...

Well, considering that this is the 5th thread he has started here, and that in the previous four he started the thread, then only responded once with "good points", I'd say this is a pretty sure bet.

the evidences
 
Racist? An abject, crawling coward? Then we have the perfect product for you!

For Nazis without the courage of their convictions ... we bring you ... the world's first anti-semitic robot!

Bearing no resemblance to a human being, iit mechanically drones out brainless nonsense in a never ending loop --- just like the real thing! Be the envy of your friends, if you have any friends.

Says proud Chilean inventor J Goebbels Jr: "At first the prototypes kept exploding when I fed Mein Kampf into its database. Then I noticed that it worked fine if I removed the logic chip first."
 
Nancarrow said:
Ya know, I think now I preferred your complaint-bot posts.
Click to expand...

I'm not going to sit here and brainlessly point out The Man Show's flaws -- we all know it has them -- but I am going to say a little about how The Man Show's appeal to racism is dangerous stuff. Although not without overlap and simplification, I plan to identify three primary positions on The Man Show's vaporings. I acknowledge that I have not accounted for all possible viewpoints within the parameters of these three positions. Nevertheless, The Man Show's hijinks are more than just larcenous. They're a revolt against nature. Most people don't realize that The Man Show has already revealed its plans to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events. It revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the hallmarks of having been written by a myopic harijan. Not only is its manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and totally anecdotal, but The Man Show hurts people wherever they may be, penthouse or poorhouse. The Man Show may mean well but it says it is within its legal right to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit. Whether or not it indeed has such a right, while The Man Show insists that it can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom, reality dictates otherwise. Actually, if you want a real dose of reality, look at how the biggest difference between me and The Man Show is that The Man Show wants to put our liberties at risk by an annoying and wanton rush to incite racial hatred. I, on the other hand, want to take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance. It is no news that in order to convince us that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by The Man Show itself), The Man Show often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes.

Imagine, as it is not hard to do, that The Man Show offers nothing but cheap insults and banal rhetoric. It then follows that it may have access to weapons of mass destruction. Then again, I consider The Man Show to be a weapon of mass destruction itself. Next time, The Man Show, you may want to check your facts correctly. One other thing: I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about The Man Show's suggestions. It's quite likely it will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of its hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now.

I must point out that I am a law-and-order kind of person. I hate to see crimes go unpunished. That's why I obviously hope that The Man Show serves a long prison term for its illegal attempts to fragment the nation into politically disharmonious units. For The Man Show's slovenly plans to succeed, it needs to "dumb down" our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. In the blink of an eye, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like "spinulosodenticulate" and "sphygmomanometric". They will be incapable of comprehending that everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that The Man Show's claim of fairness is demonstrably false. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. I don't get it: Has The Man Show ever considered what would happen if a small fraction of its time spent trying to sully my reputation was instead spent on something productive? I mean, this, of itself, is prima facie evidence that my prayers go out to everyone who was hurt by it. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to The Man Show. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find that I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to disentangle people from the snares set by The Man Show and its sympathizers. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why if Fate desired that The Man Show make a correct application of what it had read about neocolonialism, it would have to indicate title and page number, since the cankered carouser would otherwise never in all its existence find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want The Man Show to commit senseless acts of violence against anyone daring to challenge its raucous jibes, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while The Man Show claims that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. This is far from all I have to say on the topic, but it's certainly enough for now. Just remember one thing: If The Man Show is allowed to demand that Earth submit to the dominion of blasphemous gauleiters, the implications can be widespread.
 
Dr Adequate said:
Racist? An abject, crawling coward? Then we have the perfect product for you!

For Nazis without the courage of their convictions ... we bring you ... the world's first anti-semitic robot!

Bearing no resemblance to a human being, iit mechanically drones out brainless nonsense in a never ending loop --- just like the real thing! Be the envy of your friends, if you have any friends.

Says proud Chilean inventor J Goebbels Jr: "At first the prototypes kept exploding when I fed Mein Kampf into its database. Then I noticed that it worked fine if I removed the logic chip first."
Click to expand...

[The following is presented purely for entertainment purposes. Please, no wagering.]

It seems that before I launch into this letter, I should tell you that I have no sympathy for Israel. Let me begin by saying that what really irks me is that Israel has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it deploy enormous resources in a war of attrition against helpless citizens or it'll violate its pledge not to flush all my hopes and dreams down the toilet. Israel hates it when you say that I find it the most lame-brained organization in the world. It really hates it when you say that. Try saying that to it sometime, if you have a thick skin and don't mind having it shriek insults at you. Israel thumbs its nose at some of the very things I, for one, treasure. This means, in particular, that Israel writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that it constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to its readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that I know more about credentialism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that it is immature and stupid of Israel to impose a narrow theological agenda on secular society. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to keep our priorities in check, and that's why I say that it has been known to say that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal. That notion is so prudish, I hardly know where to begin refuting it.

Israel justifies its thievery by saying things like, "It's for the good of society". Then again, that notion has been popular for as long as propagandism has existed. When Israel first announced that it wanted to condition the public to accept violence as normal and desirable, I nearly choked on my own stomach bile.

More concretely, no matter how bad you think Israel's plans for the future are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. Israel should keep its thoughts to itself. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time Israel tried to let down ladders which the inarticulate, rebarbative, and haughty scramble to climb. I don't know if I speak for anybody but myself on this, but Israel wants us to feel sorry for the officious palookas who feed us ever-larger doses of its lies and crackpot assumptions. I think we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that Israel plans to hammer a few more nails into the coffin of freedom. It has instructed its yes-men not to discuss this or even admit to its plan's existence. Obviously, Israel knows it has something to hide. Israel needs to stop living in denial. It needs to wake up and realize that I truly feel that it has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. Israel obviously has none, or it wouldn't put feckless thoughts in our children's minds. The moral of the story: I am skeptical of efforts to produce a supercilious definition of "biblicopsychological".
 
You really like that cut-n-paste program, don't you Shemp? :)

So, if it is plagurised from a book, should be reported?
 
shemp said:
I'm not going to sit here and brainlessly point out The Man Show's flaws...

... Just remember one thing: If The Man Show is allowed to demand that Earth submit to the dominion of blasphemous gauleiters, the implications can be widespread.
Click to expand...

Aaah. All is right with the world again. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom