UrsulaV
Muse
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
- Messages
- 956
And what's your explanation for Professor Dietrich's affidavit? Was he part of the conspiracy to defraud as well?
Dietrich may well have believed everything he wrote.
So what?
It's still an anecdote. Do you have detailed medical records from somebody other than Cayce? Do you have X-rays? Do you have any HARD evidence?
Articles about how great Cayce was aren't evidence. Speeches about how great Cayce was, given by his business partner, DEFINITELY aren't evidence. That you'd even mention them as if they had any significance says something about the standard of evidence you're working with. I strongly suspect that if I found a speech saying "I think Cayce is a fraud!" you wouldn't accept that as evidence of anything. Likewise, I don't think your anecdotes are worth much.
Testable evidence. What we need--and are unlikely to get--is testable evidence. I'm not saying it's been proved Cayce was a fraud, but I AM saying that you have nothing like enough good data to prove anything. All your accounts of "Gee, Cayce was great!" are meaningless without hard, testable evidence to back them up.
