• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump's Second Term

What makes that an exception?
If nothing else it wasn't plunder. The Elgin marbles were obtained during a time of peace, not war so are not plunder. The exact legitimacy of the removal could be argued (and was), but it wasn't done in secret, nor by force, and there is no evidence of any objection by the Islamic authorities to the removal of idolatrous statues. Elgin was the British Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire. In any case it is irrelevant to the argument that art should be returned to its place and culture of origin. China does this by a policy of purchase. Benin Bronzes (actual plunder) by politics. The Bayeux tapestry by temporary loan.

The issue is whether Columbus should be glorified given his actions. The Elgin marbles are often referred to as the Parthenon marbles so as to not glorify Elgin. Columbus destroyed the art and culture of native Americans taking gold by force*; Elgin sought to preserve the art and culture of ancient Greece.

*As Trump would say 'to the victor go the spoils', I am sure Trump would oppose the return of art gained by plunder.

 
If nothing else it wasn't plunder. The Elgin marbles were obtained during a time of peace, not war so are not plunder. The exact legitimacy of the removal could be argued (and was), but it wasn't done in secret, nor by force, and there is no evidence of any objection by the Islamic authorities to the removal of idolatrous statues. Elgin was the British Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire. In any case it is irrelevant to the argument that art should be returned to its place and culture of origin. China does this by a policy of purchase. Benin Bronzes (actual plunder) by politics. The Bayeux tapestry by temporary loan.

The issue is whether Columbus should be glorified given his actions. The Elgin marbles are often referred to as the Parthenon marbles so as to not glorify Elgin. Columbus destroyed the art and culture of native Americans taking gold by force*; Elgin sought to preserve the art and culture of ancient Greece.

*As Trump would say 'to the victor go the spoils', I am sure Trump would oppose the return of art gained by plunder.

The Parthenon Marbles were a theft backed up with forged documents. Elgin never had permission from any authority to destroy them and remove the remains.
 
The Parthenon Marbles were a theft backed up with forged documents. Elgin never had permission from any authority to destroy them and remove the remains.
You may believe so, but it wasn't plunder. There are no 'forged' documents in evidence, the lack of original documents is not evidence of forgery. In retrospect we may know the Parthenon survived and Greece became an independent country. In Elgin's time it was possible that his actions were the best chance of survival of these artefacts. From an article advocating for the return of the marbles;
The extent of the permission granted to Elgin by the occupying powers in Greece has been debated by some, but the Turks were indeed the ‘internationally recognised authority’ in the region and took no steps to prevent or circumscribe his activities. Whether Elgin’s motives were ‘selfless and noble’ is also debatable. The justification he offered on his return was the aim of fostering and encouraging the arts in the United Kingdom—but perhaps you would say that if you were trying to sell your acquisitions to the British Museum. No doubt by his actions he did protect the Marbles from further intermittent and piecemeal depredation, and possibly from damage they might have suffered in the Greek War of Independence. But it is also true that the Marbles were damaged by well-intentioned acts of ‘restoration’ in the Victorian era.
A more detailed discussion of the authenticity of the documents remaining and the legality thereof can be read here,
In any case coming back to the thread; Trump would oppose the return, he is clearly a believer in possession justifying ownership, and the strong have the right of possession, viz Diego Garcia.
 
What makes that an exception?
I don't follow what you mean about an exception.

The original comment was about statues of Columbus, and some people wanting removed because they don't think the European conquest of the Americas deserves heroic monuments.

The Elgin marbles aren't in the British museum as a monument to conquest. Arguably as a result of conquest, but they're not a symbolic celebration of it. And when they were in their original locations they weren't a monument to conquest either. Most of them, as I understand it, depict a mythical tale of a fight between men and centaurs, which broke out at a wedding.
 
Last edited:
You may believe so, but it wasn't plunder. There are no 'forged' documents in evidence, the lack of original documents is not evidence of forgery. In retrospect we may know the Parthenon survived and Greece became an independent country. In Elgin's time it was possible that his actions were the best chance of survival of these artefacts. From an article advocating for the return of the marbles;

A more detailed discussion of the authenticity of the documents remaining and the legality thereof can be read here,
In any case coming back to the thread; Trump would oppose the return, he is clearly a believer in possession justifying ownership, and the strong have the right of possession, viz Diego Garcia.
It's a perfect example of plunder.
 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

I see so many comments from the Radical Left Morons and Lunatics that China and Russia are helping the "wonderful” Islamic Republic of Iran.
If they are, it's at a very low level, but I don't believe they are at all.
They have too much to lose, and we would know about it, and know about it very fast!
Thank you for your attention to this matter.

President DONALD J. TRUMP
 
Look what happened in Ohio since my last Rally, and I have another one today.
It’s The Golden Age of America! President
DONALD J. TRUMP

1791886297361.png
 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

I see so many comments from the Radical Left Morons and Lunatics that China and Russia are helping the "wonderful” Islamic Republic of Iran.
If they are, it's at a very low level, but I don't believe they are at all.
They have too much to lose, and we would know about it, and know about it very fast!
Thank you for your attention to this matter.

President DONALD J. TRUMP
Translation: Natalie hasn't told me anything, so it never happened.
 
Who do historical cultural artifacts belong to?
All of mankind.

Who should be the Steward for them ?
Whoever can keep them safe and provide easy access to the largest number of people.

No one should own great pieces of art or archeology - they should just make sure that they are preserved and can be studied and appreciated.
That should be more than enough reward.
 
Who do historical cultural artifacts belong to?
All of mankind.

Who should be the Steward for them ?
Whoever can keep them safe and provide easy access to the largest number of people.

No one should own great pieces of art or archeology - they should just make sure that they are preserved and can be studied and appreciated.
That should be more than enough reward.
So ripping them off a building abd chopping them up is the thing to do?
 
Last edited:
I don't follow what you mean about an exception.

The original comment was about statues of Columbus, and some people wanting removed because they don't think the European conquest of the Americas deserves heroic monuments.

The Elgin marbles aren't in the British museum as a monument to conquest. Arguably as a result of conquest, but they're not a symbolic celebration of it. And when they were in their original locations they weren't a monument to conquest either. Most of them, as I understand it, depict a mythical tale of a fight between men and centaurs, which broke out at a wedding.
I do know the history, thanks.
 
I don't doubt it.

I just didn't get why you seemed puzzled that I thought the marbles were a different category of thing to Columbus statues. So far as I know Italy is not demanding all the Columbus statues back.
Wouldn't that be the Spanish? Columbus was financed and dispatched by the Spanish royal family. So any spoils were theirs.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom