• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

The behaviour of UK police officers.

I feel very sorry for people who say a wrong thing, and that is the end for them. Businessman and jeweller Gerald Ratner is a well known example of a poorly chose throw away comment that caused the end for him. In other cases, such as Eddie Gray the football pundit, lost his job because of a course of behaviour that was exposed by one comment. Greg Wallace is another, where he lost his TV job over a series of events, whereas John Torode apparently sang a song that had offensive lyrics and that was enough. I am not just applying my opinion to the cop, I am applying it to everyone. One comment that is out of character and apologised for, compared to a comment that is part of their general behaviour and attitude, are very different things.

I bet you that you would not be as harsh on yourself or a friend, if they said one wrong thing.
It depends on what the wrong thing is.

"I'm sorry I didn't realise that term x was offensive" maybe needs a bit of retraining if that's a sincere response.

"I told a colleague that I wished sexual violence on her" has no excuse. It's bullying, clear sexual harassment, and indicative of someone who, as @smartcooky says, is utterly unsuited to holding a position of authority. This is what he said to a colleague. How does he behave to girls whom he finds annoying when he's on duty?
 
Jesus, that is really bad.

Seems to me that PC Smith is just another
despicable tyrant in a police uniform who gets off on bullying old people.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<Snip> for rule 12.

I remember that and I did not and would not justify that use of force.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It depends on what the wrong thing is.

"I'm sorry I didn't realise that term x was offensive" maybe needs a bit of retraining if that's a sincere response.

"I told a colleague that I wished sexual violence on her" has no excuse. It's bullying, clear sexual harassment, and indicative of someone who, as @smartcooky says, is utterly unsuited to holding a position of authority. This is what he said to a colleague. How does he behave to girls whom he finds annoying when he's on duty?

I think before someone is sacked, that a course of behaviour needs to be proved, not just a one off that happened in the moment and is not accompanied by anything else.
 
I think before someone is sacked, that a course of behaviour needs to be proved, not just a one off that happened in the moment and is not accompanied by anything else.
I disagree.

There are some things that are always beyond the pale and that is one. The only exception would be extreme edge cases which would have involved extremely hurtful taunting by the policewoman, which didn't happen.
 
I disagree.

There are some things that are always beyond the pale and that is one. The only exception would be extreme edge cases which would have involved extremely hurtful taunting by the policewoman, which didn't happen.

I would discipline the person, with a fine, or demotion, but not the sack for a one off.
 
I would discipline the person, with a fine, or demotion, but not the sack for a one off.
There's the problem right there. These people should be held to far higher standard than those of us who are unfortunate enough to be "policed" by them.

How many members of the public are charged with a petty, one off, crime? The words goose and gander spring to mind.
 
I think before someone is sacked, that a course of behaviour needs to be proved, not just a one off that happened in the moment and is not accompanied by anything else.
No there are actions that warrant immediate dismissal and wishung sexual violence on a colleague is one of them. If nothing else, it's a giant red flag
 
No there are actions that warrant immediate dismissal and wishung sexual violence on a colleague is one of them. If nothing else, it's a giant red flag
Absolutely enormous red flag.

Police officers are in a position of trust and thus the public is entitled to expect that the officers can control themselves when they are in public, because failing to do so suggests they are worse when they are not easily identified
 
No there are actions that warrant immediate dismissal and wishung sexual violence on a colleague is one of them. If nothing else, it's a giant red flag

But what if, after investigation, it is not a red flag and it was a one off?
 
But what if, after investigation, it is not a red flag and it was a one off?
Please expand more on this "one off" concept. Drunk drivers, shoplifters, speeders and many more "one off" miscreants need to learn how it works, from an insider.
 
A North Yorkshire Police officer has been sacked without notice after comparing a colleague's skin colour to chocolate bars

The officer, referred to as "Officer A" in misconduct proceedings, was found to have compared the colleague's skin colour to chocolate bars, using words to the effect of: "I can call you Bounty or coconut or Milky Way."

A misconduct panel also found that Officer A had remarked on the colleague's lack of a perceived tan when he returned from holiday

The following day, October 20, 2023, Officer A said that if another officer were a chocolate bar, he would be a Galaxy. The panel ruled this remark was racist.

A further allegation, that Officer A repeatedly compared the first colleague to chocolate bars between April 2022 and October 2023, was also found proven. However, the panel said there was insufficient evidence to make a finding on an allegation that Officer A made insulting comments about Ramadan.

 
It's also showing yet again exactly how woke the police have become and how prejudiced they have become against white British folk, sacking a good old copper for a few hurty words indeed!
 
Last edited:
Please expand more on this "one off" concept. Drunk drivers, shoplifters, speeders and many more "one off" miscreants need to learn how it works, from an insider.

If someone commits a crime, it is the only time they have committed a crime, they admit it and apologise, then they get a lighter sentence. Sacking someone is not a light sentence. Fining them or demoting them would be.
 
A North Yorkshire Police officer has been sacked without notice after comparing a colleague's skin colour to chocolate bars

The officer, referred to as "Officer A" in misconduct proceedings, was found to have compared the colleague's skin colour to chocolate bars, using words to the effect of: "I can call you Bounty or coconut or Milky Way."

A misconduct panel also found that Officer A had remarked on the colleague's lack of a perceived tan when he returned from holiday

The following day, October 20, 2023, Officer A said that if another officer were a chocolate bar, he would be a Galaxy. The panel ruled this remark was racist.

A further allegation, that Officer A repeatedly compared the first colleague to chocolate bars between April 2022 and October 2023, was also found proven. However, the panel said there was insufficient evidence to make a finding on an allegation that Officer A made insulting comments about Ramadan.


He deserves the sack, because it was a persistent course of action.
 
If someone commits a crime, it is the only time they have committed a crime, they admit it and apologise, then they get a lighter sentence. Sacking someone is not a light sentence. Fining them or demoting them would be.

But that's a different situation.

If I told a female colleague that I wished her to suffer sexual violence, I would almost certainly be immediately suspended from work, followed by being fired.

And I am not in a position of trust that police officers are in.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom