• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Artificial Intelligence

It seems this language is result of pressure on number of output tokens during thinking phase. Responses which think in fewer words are prioritized. The output itself must be formal English of course, but for thinking this is not always required. Chain of thought inspection is not perfect tool, but is the best tool we now have to see inside the infamous black box .. and its readability is recognized as important feature.
This seems to be fixable, I'm sure OpenAI will do everything for safety. Like .. totally sure :cool:
 
I think you meant to cough USA not China?
No. China routinely ignores intellectual property rights and copyrights, engages in industrial and business espionage alongside governmental, and is the leading perpetrator of cyberattacks and identity theft.

If safeguards are put in place to slow AI development, China won’t honor them.
 
The point is not actually to safeguard anything. The point is to create an expensive regulatory regime. Politicians benefit because an entire industry will donate money to make sure the regulations favor them. And large AI companies benefit because they have the resources and connections to navigate that regulatory regime but it will strangle potential startup competitors in the crib.

And yeah, China will do whatever they want, our rules mean nothing to them. But they will gladly encourage us to hobble ourselves.
 
I am not using SoMe at all, but my wife is, and she is often encountering video garbage of apparently small random dramas like a woman being tackling a man who tries to grab her bag, or someone stealing money from a beggar, and being handled by passers-by. The multiple cameras with good view that are in place before the encounters reveal that it is all an act. Is this what is called a microdrama? Or would it be nanodramas? AI could certainly create this with no trouble.
No, a proper "microdrama" is practically a short-form soap opera, with episodes that end in cliffhangers and everything.
 
China also does a ton of these in portrait mode, and like 1 minute episodes, and they post it on tiktok. It has full production though. I mean cheap Chinese production, but still. They also love recycle screenplays, word by word, just with different actors. And that's all before AI.
Now it's only gonna get weirder with AI.
 
I like this video a lot, a long talk with Geoffrey Hinton.


Much of the first 36 minutes or so covers the process of backpropagation, the computational method used for training LLM neural networks.
Starts getting juicier after that.
 
The point is not actually to safeguard anything. The point is to create an expensive regulatory regime. Politicians benefit because an entire industry will donate money to make sure the regulations favor them.
Your libertarianism is showing.

No, the point is to prevent tech bros and billionaires from destroying the world in their quest for cool tech and even more insane wealth.

And large AI companies benefit because they have the resources and connections to navigate that regulatory regime but it will strangle potential startup competitors in the crib.
As if large AI companies don't already have a huge advantage over startup 'competitors'.

And yeah, China will do whatever they want, our rules mean nothing to them. But they will gladly encourage us to hobble ourselves.
So China is also calling for regulation of AI, but only in the US?
 
No, the point is to prevent tech bros and billionaires from destroying the world in their quest for cool tech and even more insane wealth.
That's why those same billionaire tech bros are advocating for such a regulatory regime? To save everyone else from themselves? Of course not. They're being selfish bastards, they aren't trying to protect you.
So China is also calling for regulation of AI, but only in the US?
China is backing US groups opposed to AI and data centers. Did you not know this?
 
The rules that everybody except China and the US believes they have to follow in order for there to not be a Third World War.

If i was giving odds on which one is more likely to do that, USA would be a very short favourite.

One of those countries' leaders is not a narcissistic thicko POS.
 
I personally believe in the AI revolution, I love my little file renamer app that wouldn't have been possible just a year or two back without current AI. That definitely adds a few billions to the valuation of these companies.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom