smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
Irrelevant bollocks.Being a braggart or 'giving it large' is not actually a criminal offence. It is immoral but hardly cause to run a character assassination campaign. Had Arday actually committed a criminal offence, he'd be protected by libel and subjudice laws until such time he was convicted.
Why did Harris of Plymouth start fine-tooth combing through Arday's theses in the first place, and then get in touch with Groves? I dare say Groves felt he had a great story and felt vindictive because Arday called the police on him and got Carter-Ruck (who deal with libel) to send a desist letter to the TIMES. There is nothing unreasonable about that; this was Arday's entire livelihood, career and identity at stake. Groves, feeling no doubt vindictive about the police warning, went ahead anyway but then there was an astonishing two-week pile on with all of the mainstream UK press joining in. It was the sort of character assassination that used to be dished out to rapists and murderers. All over some minor professor nobody but a small handful had even heard of.
Answer the bloody questions (or have you done quick Google and found you were wrong, but don't have the courage to admit it.