• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

Thermal said:
I know someone exactly like this- he thinks he is smart, and either hangs around enough stupid people to pull it off, and/or the smart people he hangs around with kind of pity him and stopped bothering to correct him long ago (too time consuming with no benefit). He even threw in obscure or Latin phrases whenever he could, always using them a little incorrectly.
Click to expand...
You know Boris Johnson? Wow! :eek:
 
Vixen said:
Okay. So next bit. Consider the following:

You are a YouTuber content creator. You create content on the latest new car. So, you want to film your mate driving this new model. You put on your GoPro camera to film him driving along a motorway. He is travelling at 50 mph. You are filming alongside of him in your car.

Question: how fast do you need to travel to keep up with him, so that he appears perfectly static in your video, with the background visibly whizzing by: is it:

  1. Faster
  2. 50 mph
  3. Slower
  4. Stationary
  5. Haven't a clue?
Click to expand...
Ah, an arithmetic question from the mind of someone who wrote:
  • 250,000K when they meant 250,000 {post #1503}
  • "There were 5,771 photos taken over a total of 4,834 minutes, over all six missions (excl. Rover photos) or one every 50 secs, according to Marcus Allen. The Hasselblad shutter speed is 1.5 sec, for the shutter to open and shut and auto-wind on to the next frame. Apollo 11 took 123 surface pics in 151 minutes does the maths work?" {post #270}
  • "the astronauts on Artemis III had to be prised out by up to 150 guys" but they meant Artemis II and 15 guys {post #2343}
  • and, when faced with the question "if something weighs 180 lbs on Earth, how much does it weigh on the Moon?" {post #6423} and who replied "Divide it by six (one/sixth gravity of the Earth)." {post #6425} then gave up on that arduous arithmetic task and wrote "I am out." {post #6429}.
Perhaps we should check for errors in the question first?
 
Mojo said:
The problem here is that Vixen thinks she's the smartest person here, and is therefore tailoring her posts to someone who is really stupid.
Click to expand...
Well, she's failing, if that's what she's doing; not even I am stupid enough to fall for her nonsense, and i am definitely the stupidest person in this room. So there!
QED. Et tu, Quoque whoever he was.
 
Last edited:
Axxman300 said:
Forgive me for dropping fun facts here, but we have a lunar eclipse this week:

NASA Scientific Visualization Studio | August 27-28, 2026 Deep Partial Lunar Eclipse

On August 28, 2026 (the evening of the 27th in some time zones), the Moon passes into the shadow of Earth, creating a deep partial lunar eclipse. At the moment of greatest eclipse, 4:13 a.m. Univeral Time, 96.3% of the Moon's disk will be within Earth's umbra. The Americas are centrally located...
svs.gsfc.nasa.gov svs.gsfc.nasa.gov

Wonder how many stars I can photograph while the moon is out?
Click to expand...
It depends on how long the exposure time you set. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom