Woody Brown hasn't been attacked by anyone.
It was likely that they were a lot more knowledgeable about the truth and cynically decided to ignore it because "college helps autistic man develops his genius" is a lot more lucrative than "college exposes mothe abusing her sutistic son for financial gain".As I said earlier, it is quite likely that between ADA and HIPPA regulations, they had little choice but to accept what the mother claimed and had to go along with the charade to avoid fines or lawsuits or accusations of discrimination.
In both cases, you keep appealing to their academic credentials as evidence of merit.But if he was awarded a PhD and appointed as a professor then there is nothing fake about that either. [...]
Woody Brown has a Master's in English from Stanford and now he is doing a Creative Writing doctorate.
I am also rather suspicious of the parents.It was likely that they were a lot more knowledgeable about the truth and cynically decided to ignore it because "college helps autistic man develops his genius" is a lot more lucrative than "college exposes mothe abusing her sutistic son for financial gain".
There is no law, honestly written which will demand that you further a destructive and criminal lie; which is what you're alleging here.
I am also rather suspicious of the parents.
Have you followed this thread at all?Why are you 'suspicious of the parents'?
Having stopped to think about the Woody Brown situation, I've come to the conclusion that the problem lies with his mom and with Stanford, not with him or with me. I'm sure if you stop to think about it, you'll reach the same conclusion.
Self-evidently I was not referring to Arday.Fraud is monetary or pecuniary gain by intent to deceive. You don't know whether Arday was ever in a car crash or not. You are just assuming he's lying, and even if he was, it doesn't count as fraud. Before laying into someone because you don't believe their story, perhaps stop to think whether the problem lies with you, not them.
Sigh. Try and think for yourself.Why are you 'suspicious of the parents'?
What's your problem? You said we should stop to think about the situation. I told you I had done that.That tells us more about you than about him, Stanford or her.
Even if that was true, that doesn't mean that the universities wouldn't want to avoid a lawsuit or accusations of discrimination.There is no law, honestly written which will demand that you further a destructive and criminal lie; which is what you're alleging here.
I will believe that Woody Brown independently got his university degree and wrote his book only when a series of blinded trials shows definitively his mother is communicating his thoughts and not her own. My understanding is to date his mother has refused to do such testing.
What bizarre and disturbing fantasies you have.I am now waiting for the day when Woody Brown gets suicided by society for being a 'flake' as one poster so charmingly labels an autistic person.
What is 'suicided by society' even supposed to mean?I am now waiting for the day when Woody Brown gets suicided by society for being a 'flake' as one poster so charmingly labels an autistic person.
What is 'suicided by society' even supposed to mean?
The key point here, as it relates to Arday, is that YOU used Arday as an example of someone who overcame non-verbal autism to do great things with the suggestion that if Arday did it then Brown could have done it too.I am now waiting for the day when Woody Brown gets suicided by society for being a 'flake' as one poster so charmingly labels an autistic person.
Probably the only time that show was reality based.One of the Law & Order shows had an autistic teen communicating with facilitated communication through his mother. She ended up being in deep denial, with no malicious intent, desperate to connect with her son, genuinely believing she had a relationship with him, and was emotionally crushed when she was shown otherwise.
"Of course she's upset. We just showed her she's spent the last five years talking to herself."