Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

[Steve]

Guess what you see when you click the "visit" button at the lower right? It takes you to a Facebook post by a meteorologist showing this image.

View attachment 74506

Vixen knows that. It is merely another fact that she needs to dodge,

 

[Vixen]

I can second what Steve said. And I'm pretty confident that Jay can support it too.

Still relying on logical fallacies, I see.

 

[LondonJohn]

I have no control over your emotions.

Did I claim that you do?

 

[Reformed Offlian]

Guess what you see when you click the "visit" button at the lower right? It takes you to a Facebook post by a meteorologist showing this image.

View attachment 74506

Ooh! Pretty stars!

 

[Vixen]

It was the fastest film available, gave good colour rendering and had a well understood development process.

Monochrome negative film was also used.

What do you mean, 'available'? It was bespoke made especially for the occasion.

 

[Steve]

Do look up the pros and cons.

You stop jaq'ing and tell us. You know, provide one of those facts that you are constantly avoiding.

 

[Foster Zygote]

I do not 'dismiss' anyone. I am the person who is 'dismissed' because people no longer have the ability to differentiate beween what is fact and what is merely a common assumption. For example, we have been constantly informed that the Apollo 11 landing and 'live tv' broadcast really happened because people enjoyed watching it on tv.

More straw man lies, Vixen. No one here has even remotely suggested that the Apollo 11 mission had to have happened because people enjoyed watching the TV transmissions.

You have been consistently and profoundly on the wrong side of the facts from the start.

 

[Vixen]

Did I claim that you do?

You are giving us running commentary on your feelings as if this is at all relevant. All it gives us is an insight into your inner world. Your projections.

 

[LondonJohn]

Still relying on logical fallacies, I see.

What?? (And what is your obsession with seeking - usually, as in this case, incorrectly - to brand things as "logical fallacies"?)

 

[Steve]

More straw man lies, Vixen. No one here has even remotely suggested that the Apollo 11 mission had to have happened because people enjoyed watching the TV transmissions.

You have been consistently and profoundly on the wrong side of the facts from the start.

To paraphrase a well known lyricist - (Vixen) sees what (she) wants to see and disregards the rest.

 

[LondonJohn]

You are giving us running commentary on your feelings as if this is at all relevant. All it gives us is an insight into your inner world. Your projections.

LMAO. And, by the way, I think my reaction to your horrifically comedic "defence" of claiming you had a near-eidetic memory is both relevant and appropriate.

 

[theprestige]

*In the context of carrying your own weight on your back* ceteris paribus

It's still mutatis mutandi.

 

[Vixen]

What?? (And what is your obsession with seeking - usually, as in this case, incorrectly - to brand things as "logical fallacies"?)

Stating that Tom, Dick and Harry agree with you adds no weight to the debate. It is a recognised logical fallacy.

 

[LondonJohn]

It's still mutatis mutandi.

It a classic deus ex machina (or is that a logical fallacy?)

 

[Vixen]

LMAO. And, by the way, I think my reaction to your horrifically comedic "defence" of claiming you had a near-eidetic memory is both relevant and appropriate.

If it makes you cringe that someone corrects an untrue claim, what does it say about your inner view of the world?

 

[LondonJohn]

Stating that Tom, Dick and Harry agree with you adds no weight to the debate. It is a recognised logical fallacy.

No. No it's not. Why don't you go and learn the actual list of logical fallacies, to the point where you understand them, before embarrassing yourself like this.

 

[Vixen]

To paraphrase a well known lyricist - (Vixen) sees what (she) wants to see and disregards the rest.

This is where you and I differ, so it is apposite that lyric came to your mind, as your own projection.

 

[JayUtah]

What do you mean, 'available'? It was bespoke made especially for the occasion.

I have explained to you multiple times why this is not correct.

 

[Vixen]

It's still mutatis mutandi.

No.

 

[LondonJohn]

If it makes you cringe that someone corrects an untrue claim, what does it say about your inner view of the world?

I read that post of yours in context. Your accusations that you were being accused of having dementia (let alone a "fatal illness") were pathetic and were entirely your invention. The only thing he wrote was that you have a poor memory. Which, demonstrably, you do have.