• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

Reformed Offlian said:
The actual image from the NASA site's gallery is here. No stars.

www.nasa.gov

art002e009288 - NASA

art002e009288 (April 6, 2026) – Earthset captured through the Orion spacecraft window at 6:41 p.m. EDT, April 6, 2026, during the Artemis II crew’s flyby of the Moon. A muted blue Earth with bright white clouds sets behind the cratered lunar surface. The dark portion of Earth is experiencing...
www.nasa.gov www.nasa.gov
Click to expand...
Well, they wouldn't would they.
 
Reformed Offlian said:
Wouldn't what? You said you got the official NASA photo. Whatever else you might think, my image is far more official NASA than what you have offered so far. Do you have anything better?
Click to expand...

That's what came up in the search engine. So it was a modified picture, for some reason, yet attributed to NASA. Of course there would be stars.

I guess they might not show on NASA's official site, as that would start up the 'stars' question all over again.
 
Vixen said:
That's what came up in the search engine. So it was a modified picture, for some reason, yet attributed to NASA. Of course there would be stars.

I guess they might not show on NASA's official site, as that would start up the 'stars' question all over again.
Click to expand...
So we're back to counting these again. 4 this time::dl::dl::dl::dl:
 
Vixen said:
That's what came up in the search engine. So it was a modified picture, for some reason, yet attributed to NASA. Of course there would be stars.

I guess they might not show on NASA's official site, as that would start up the 'stars' question all over again.
Click to expand...

That's certainly a guess.

The actual photo shows no stars. Period. You are left without an argument, only excuses and cope.
 
Vixen said:
That's what came up in the search engine. So it was a modified picture, for some reason, yet attributed to NASA. Of course there would be stars.
Click to expand...
...which—along with the obvious illumination difficulties—tells a person of ordinary intelligence that it's a fake photo. And that in turn would immediately cause the conscientious researcher to question the attribution.

You did none of that, despite claiming to be a person of extraordinary intelligence.

Vixen said:
I guess they might not show on NASA's official site, as that would start up the 'stars' question all over again.
Click to expand...
There is no legitimate question, as you well know but refuse to admit.
 
JayUtah said:
...which—along with the obvious illumination difficulties—tells a person of ordinary intelligence that it's a fake photo. And that in turn would immediately cause the conscientious researcher to question the attribution.

You did none of that, despite claiming to be a person of extraordinary intelligence.


There is no legitimate question, as you well know but refuse to admit.
Click to expand...
Well, intelligence can be extraordinary at both extremes of the scale.
 
Reformed Offlian said:
If all you had was a search result, on what basis did you call it the official NASA photo? After all this time, your MENSA-caliber intellect and keen accountancy-honed investigative skills haven't mastered the basics of online research?
Click to expand...

That was the caption beneath it. It said credited to NASA. Stars would be visible, would they not?
 
Vixen said:
That was the caption beneath it. It said credited to NASA.
Click to expand...

Show me the screenshot. And even if you have one, that's nowhere near sufficient due diligence. You need to actually source it back to NASA, as I was able to do with mine in about 30 seconds.

Vixen said:
Stars would be visible, would they not?
Click to expand...

Nope.
 
Last edited:
Vixen said:
That was the caption beneath it. It said credited to NASA.
Click to expand...
That doesn't address the problem that the photo is obviously fake and you—the person claiming extraordinary intelligence—didn't seem to notice that while the people you dismiss as "mean sd" noticed it right away.

Can you explain that?

Vixen said:
Stars would be visible, would they not?
Click to expand...
No.
 
Vixen said:
Herewith, as you requested.
Click to expand...
That's the summary generated by Google image search. I got the same thing. When you click on "Visit" it takes you to a photo montage containing many actual Artemis images but not the thumbnail in the search summary. You didn't even bother to visit the actual site. You just trusted Google to slop together your research for you.

Absolutely pathetic.
 
JayUtah said:
That's the summary generated by Google image search. I got the same thing. When you click on "Visit" it takes you to a photo montage containing many actual Artemis images but not the thumbnail in the search summary. You didn't even bother to visit the actual site. You just trusted Google to slop together your research for you.

Absolutely pathetic.
Click to expand...
That's what I saw, too.
 
JayUtah said:
That doesn't address the problem that the photo is obviously fake and you—the person claiming extraordinary intelligence—didn't seem to notice that while the people you dismiss as "mean sd" noticed it right away.

Can you explain that?


No.
Click to expand...

I do not 'dismiss' anyone. I am the person who is 'dismissed' because people no longer have the ability to differentiate beween what is fact and what is merely a common assumption. For example, we have been constantly informed that the Apollo 11 landing and 'live tv' broadcast really happened because people enjoyed watching it on tv.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom