MostlyHarmless
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Messages
- 298
Oh! It is definitely a US thing. We don't like to be held to our own standards, or the civilized world's.
It's a touching tribute to the generosity of spirit that so many of y'all are still mistaking dishonest interlocutors for mere fools. Perhaps you'll learn otherwise in another 158 pages?
“This is what radical leftism is,” he went on. “It may wear various different slogans and ideologies across place and time. They can call themselves anti-capitalists or anti-imperialists or communists or anarchist or Marxist. But the fundamental character is always the same. It’s always the same. It is a poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of equality and justice and liberation.”
President Donald Trump and his allies have prioritized talking points against the far left ahead of the congressional elections this November. Trump has repeatedly stated that the Democratic Party's ascendant left are communists who want to "completely destroy the traditional American way of life" and even engage in assassinations.
Vice President JD Vance has similarly called out communism as a political shift that is "something we haven't seen in the U.S." House Speaker Mike Johnson has decried "radical candidates" who are "self-described, self-identifying Marxists."
No fascist tendancy there
meanwhile marco rubio convenes summit on far left terrorism
War Crimes are nothing new, even at mind boggling scale.I dispute that characterisation. It was something that was so clearly criminal that it didn't need specific laws to point them out. I regard kangaroo courts as being for things that should never be considered crimes.
To me, "kangaroo court" implies a travesty of justice. Which Nuremberg certainly wasn't.War Crimes are nothing new, even at mind boggling scale.
Executing the enemy leadership (plus all males) was not unheard of.
Claiming that there is an Overarching Law that doesn't need codification that is being violated and can be adjudicated by the Victors is.
Kangaroo might be an unsuitable expression, but the Nuernberg trials were not really a legal proceeding in anything but shape.
Again, I think they were a good thing, and we need ways to hold people accountable for things they themselves or others have made legal that shouldn't be.
In desperation, Furnari set up an online fundraising campaign, hoping to raise an initial $150,000, but potentially millions of dollars, which he said would allow him to take the statue on tour. As of Thursday, he had raised $1,400.
Yup, Kirk wasn't a martyr. He was the punchline in his own stupid joke. And most people know that. Even his fans don't really feel strongly enough to fork out for cult artefacts.![]()
New York sculptor spent $100,000 to make a Charlie Kirk statue no one wants to buy
Sergio Furnari said he thought the lifesize sculpture – which no one commissioned – would raise ‘millions’ of dollarswww.theguardian.com
![]()
New York sculptor spent $100,000 to make a Charlie Kirk statue no one wants to buy
Sergio Furnari said he thought the lifesize sculpture – which no one commissioned – would raise ‘millions’ of dollarswww.theguardian.com
Has he never made money as an artist before? Just plonking a sculpture down in public isn't going to generate money like it's a Youtube video, physical art needs to have a buyer.
I thing either some rich magat may buy it, or some other fascists will set up a GoFundMe the way fellow racists do when some racist is fired for being racist.Yup, Kirk wasn't a martyr. He was the punchline in his own stupid joke. And most people know that. Even his fans don't really feel strongly enough to fork out for cult artefacts.
From the linked story:I thing either some rich magat may buy it, or some other fascists will set up a GoFundMe the way fellow racists do when some racist is fired for being racist.
These ◊◊◊◊◊ stick together.
It’s also clear, however, that Furnari, despite no one having commissioned him to make the statue, was hoping to make money. He said he had expected unnamed wealthy figures to donate to him – he spent $100,000 on steel, resin and labor – but that has not come to pass.
I get that, but I just think there are enough fascist adjacent people out there to bail him out.From the linked story:
They're probably outraged that he didn't know that "freedumb" has a "b" in it.I get that, but I just think there are enough fascist adjacent people out there to bail him out.
Or perhaps some communist-lefty could buy it as a public urinal?I thing either some rich magat may buy it, or some other fascists will set up a GoFundMe the way fellow racists do when some racist is fired for being racist.
These ◊◊◊◊◊ stick together.
Sergio Furnari, originally from Italy, had hoped the statue of the deceased far-right activist, which he intends to display in Times Square, would raise “millions” of dollars. Instead, he said he has been inundated by messages from people saying they intend to urinate on the sculpture.
The decision to name a stretch of Tennessee highway after the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk has been reversed, with state officials moving to relocate signs after Vietnam veterans objected to sharing the name, according to a local official.
State Route 386 —an east–west corridor cutting through Sumner and Davidson counties — has long been known as Vietnam Veterans Boulevard. Following Kirk’s assassination last September, the roadway was also designated the Charlie Kirk Memorial Highway.
No, it isn't the opposite. Calling for a trial implies a desire for punishment, which could go as far as being put to death. There is also an explicit threat of violence by the state against the victim if they don't comply, including the possibility of being arrested and jailed - which is itself a kind of violence. Finally there is the emotional trauma from being accused of something which could go to trial, another form of violence. When the person calling for a trial has the means to effect it the threat becomes real. Donald Trump has openly called for people to be put to death for their 'crimes', and he would do it too if he got the chance.Speaking of semantic games, calling for a trial is pretty much the opposite of calling for violence.
Forcing someone to do something is a form of violence.(And yes, there is ample reason to think that doctors who provide trans-affirming treatments should be made to answer questions about malpractice and ethical violations.)
Nobody is this confused.No, it isn't the opposite. Calling for a trial implies a desire for punishment, which could go as far as being put to death. There is also an explicit threat of violence by the state against the victim if they don't comply, including the possibility of being arrested and jailed - which is itself a kind of violence. Finally there is the emotional trauma from being accused of something which could go to trial, another form of violence. When the person calling for a trial has the means to effect it the threat becomes real. Donald Trump has openly called for people to be put to death for their 'crimes', and he would do it too if he got the chance.
Forcing someone to do something is a form of violence.