• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

How does an onset/increase/decrease in epidermal perspiration cause changes to an electrocardiogram trace?
Bugger!

If that's how it worked I could've been spared a trip to the hospital on Barra after an ambulance's ECG machine temperamentally refused to work on me...

Still my time at the hospital was a laugh, as I was used as an assessment victim for nurse undertaking advanced practitioner training; it was one of those rare occasions where the victim was guiding the assessor, all while said victim and the assessor's supervisor were trying not to laugh. Ex-nurses, eh? Especially the ones who spent decades supervising students in practice...

Anyway...Moon rocks...They're good.
 
No, it is a scientific fact that for most people (assuming no personality disorder or being on certain medications) lying causes a stress reaction which is completely autonomous (i.e., you have no control over it [think: sweating when you are hot, or going red when embarrassed or angry]).
This must be very distressing for you.
 
I wouldn't know. That is why I am debating it.
You are only debating for one side. If only one side has arguments worth mentioning, why claim you haven't taken a stand?

You are probably going to ignore this question like all the other questions that are uncomfortable for you. Or you'll evade the question by replying with a stream of consciousness that has no bearing to the question.
 
Unfortunately, the US Presidents at the time, Lyndon B Johnson and Richard Nixon had no problem or qualms in lying to the American people (for example, about Vietnam), so I am not sure they are reliable witnesses to history.
I must point out that both administrations were well documented internally, and by the press at the time. We know what Johnson and Nixon did in Vietnam because THEY wrote it all down, their staffs wrote it all down, the Pentagon wrote it all down, the service men, and CIA agents wrote it down, the North Vietnamese wrote it down, the Chinese wrote it down, and the Russians wrote it down.

To think that all of those entities, foreign and domestic, kept meticulous records of US actions in SE Asia...BUT SOMEHOW NEGLECTED TO KEEP RECORDS OF FAKING APOLLO...is the very definition of stupid.
 
Bugger!

If that's how it worked I could've been spared a trip to the hospital on Barra after an ambulance's ECG machine temperamentally refused to work on me...

Still my time at the hospital was a laugh, as I was used as an assessment victim for nurse undertaking advanced practitioner training; it was one of those rare occasions where the victim was guiding the assessor, all while said victim and the assessor's supervisor were trying not to laugh. Ex-nurses, eh? Especially the ones who spent decades supervising students in practice...

Anyway...Moon rocks...They're good.
Ah the fun of medical students......
I had 55 on them poking, tapping and prodding me.
 
I was trying to explain in simple terms why the truth about the 1969 Moon Landing might be classified. It is common gossip that Prince Philip when he died was in a long-term relationship with a figure mysteriously papped at his funeral but remaining unidentified by the press and that they are said to have reproduced. The fact it has not been official 'news' does not mean it is a hoax or a conspiracy theory, was the point being made. But clearly it went over people's heads.
It's not over people's heads, it's a stupid anology. 60,000 highly educated people are not privy to Prince Phillip's hobbies. I have news for you, people would be shocked if a member of ANY royal family had fidelity to their spouse. It is a non-issue. The fact is it was impossible to fake the moon landings, and it was easier, and cheaper to just up and fly to the moon and back.
 
Time and location. So, were the Apollo 11 sequences filmed in, say, Area 51, a secure US military base in a desert region, then the aspects of the planets would be in a different angle to each other as of the time of the 'live' tv broadcast later, of which timing could vary considerably and in unexpected ways.
So you know nothing about TV, or Nevada. You need to stop while you're behind.
 
My opinion of medical students having hardened over the years, I would not consent to that class of thing these days or even at the time of the Barra assessment.

Not that anyone sends medical students to Barra...
Meh they were like ducklings..... Fifth years meeting actual patients for the first time.
 
Meh they were like ducklings..... Fifth years meeting actual patients for the first time.

I would not inflict a cynical, embittered retired senior nurse on them, especially when said ex-nurse was MH and we like "normal" doctors even less than general nurses do: I might've made them cry and reconsider their life choices...
 
You are only debating for one side. If only one side has arguments worth mentioning, why claim you haven't taken a stand?

You are probably going to ignore this question like all the other questions that are uncomfortable for you. Or you'll evade the question by replying with a stream of consciousness that has no bearing to the question.
Well, think about it. Imagine you were back in Year 1500 and the priests came along demanding money for every small penance. An annoying clever dick comes along and says, wait, how does that work? Hey presto, massive pile-on by outraged, er, country-dwellers just spoiling for a ruck. They know the priests are right because it's a fact, innit? Stands to reason.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom