• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Revisited: Hoax ~vs~ Debunk

Speaking of not answering questions, when are you going to answer JayUtah's about whether Marcus Allen's claim of being able to image stars with the camera settings used on the moon EVAs was reasonable?
Since you asked me a direct question pertaining to the topic of the thread, here is an image of the sun rising on a Moon surface dawn which was amongst the first to come up on BING.

What do you notice in the sky?

1783349002756.png

Caption:

Lunar dawn awakens with the sun rising over the rugged Moon surface revealing detailed craters and a starry indigo sky. A breathtaking view captures the moment when the sun rises over the Moon's rugged surface, illuminating craters and rocky terrain with a warm, golden glow against a deep indigo sky. ​


(AI Generated Image)

NB
You will see grey shaded areas because it is digitally enhanced to do so.
 
Last edited:
Since you asked be a direct question pertaining to the topic of the post, here is an image of the sunrising on a Moon surface dawn which was amongst the first to come up on BING.

What do you notice in the sky?

View attachment 73083

Caption:

Lunar dawn awakens with the sun rising over the rugged Moon surface revealing detailed craters and a starry indigo sky. A breathtaking view captures the moment when the sun rises over the Moon's rugged surface, illuminating craters and rocky terrain with a warm, golden glow against a deep indigo sky. ​


(AI Generated.)
You have to be ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ kidding me.
 
Since you asked me a direct question pertaining to the topic of the thread, here is
...an irrelevant AI-generated image.

Marcus Allen expects to see stars in the Apollo 11 surface photographs. You know that it takes tens of seconds to expose stars on ISO 160 film. Is Allen's expectation reasonable according to the facts?

Yes or no.
 
(AI Generated Image)

NB[/I] You will see grey shaded areas because it is digitally enhanced to do so.
As if posting the image itself was not a sufficient error to maintain your 100% record, you've added this NB which is complete bollocks. There is no digital enhancement, the whole image is generated by AI.

And look at it; what do you think it's showing? It looks like a view from the surface of the Moon, with the Moon in the distance eclipsing the Sun. Total fantasy, and you have the nerve to offer this as some sort of evidence?
 
threadworm the topic is about whether the debunkers have adequately 'debunked' the claims
Adequately according to whom?

Well, the Hasselblad pics are the ones in dispute...
You know the camera settings used to take those photographs. You know how long it takes to expose stars using that film. You admitted that if you used a shutter speed of tens of seconds to try to take photographs of sunlit objects, the photos would be uselessly overexposed.

Was Marcus Allen being reasonable when he expected to see stars in those photos?
 
Last edited:
Since you asked me a direct question pertaining to the topic of the thread, here is an image of the sun rising on a Moon surface dawn which was amongst the first to come up on BING.

What do you notice in the sky?

View attachment 73083

Caption:

Lunar dawn awakens with the sun rising over the rugged Moon surface revealing detailed craters and a starry indigo sky. A breathtaking view captures the moment when the sun rises over the Moon's rugged surface, illuminating craters and rocky terrain with a warm, golden glow against a deep indigo sky. ​


(AI Generated Image)

NB
You will see grey shaded areas because it is digitally enhanced to do so.
:dl:
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom