Inside Job! CIA Chief John Brennan is responsible.

[Andy_Ross]

Wall Street Apes
@WallStreetApes

WOAH
Former Director of the CIA John Brennan “issued the Visas to 15 of the 19 September 11 hijackers”

AGAIN: 15 out of the 19 Visas issued to the 9/11 hijackers were issued by the man who would become Director of the CIA

- John Brennan was the CIA daily intelligence briefer for President Bill Clinton
- In 1996, he was CIA station chief in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- John Brennan issued passports to 9/11 hijackers
- John Brennan becomes Director of the CIA

What are the odds???

You can verify that he was in a position to influence all of this

In 1996, Brennan was the CIA Station Chief in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Visas for the hijackers were issued by US State Department consular officers at US embassies and consulates in Saudi Arabia

The CIA worked hand in hand with the state department

But the “coincidences” don’t stop there

As Station Chief, Brennan managed the CIA’s close and criticized relationship with Saudi intelligence services during a period when al-Qaeda was rising

Many people and even former officials have alleged that the US intelligence community, including Brennan’s station, downplayed warnings about Osama bin Laden and Islamist extremism in the late 1990s

Inside job

video in link

 

[Andy_Ross]

Brennan left Saudi Arabia in 1999. The Visas were not issued by Brennan; as they were issued in 2000-2001. Which is why we don't get those dates.

 

[Oystein]

You may want to check your link - it does not bring me to a video of interest. Just the Xitter feed of yet another MAGAlomaniac preaching and practicing hate.

 

[Andy_Ross]

That's strange, I definitely linked the right thing.

Try this

https://twitter.com/x/status/2059476377703948711

 

[The Great Zaganza]

a bit telling that they aren't upset with Saudi Arabia.

 

[Allen773]

As Station Chief, Brennan managed the CIA’s close and criticized relationship with Saudi intelligence services during a period when al-Qaeda was rising

Many people and even former officials have alleged that the US intelligence community, including Brennan’s station, downplayed warnings about Osama bin Laden and Islamist extremism in the late 1990s.

Criticize Brennan re: Saudi Arabia all you want, but the bolded absolutely isn't true. If anything the CIA and elements of the FBI (NY Field Office under John O'Neill) were the most hair on fire alarmed of anyone in the US government about bin Laden and Islamic extremism prior to 9/11. Along with a few others like Richard Clarke and his staff at the NSC.

The problem, as is well documented, is that many of these people hated each other and had radically different ideas about how to fight al Qaeda. But that makes sense, considering the jurisdictional and other fundamental differences between the CIA, the FBI, not to mention the partisan divide between the Clinton and Bush White Houses.

The State Department didn't want to rock the boat with the Saudis, neither did the Defense Department or Treasury (love the liquidity from petrodollars to finance our federal deficits), and besides we needed their cooperation not just re: terrorism financing but also with Saddam's Iraq, Iran (what else is new), and of course the Israeli-Palestinian peace process (remember that? Those were the days...). We also wanted cheap oil prices on the world market - a big factor for politicians of both parties since the 70s.

And on the subject of bin Laden, we needed the Saudis to pressure both the Taliban to hand him over and to help pressure Pakistan to stop
supporting the Taliban (and by extension bin Laden). Neither were successful efforts, but hey, we did try.

Bottom line: 9/11 was not in fact an inside job.

 

[Norman Alexander]

Don't let facts stand in the way of a nobody's whacko podcast.

 

[The Great Zaganza]

... and then the Intelligence Commuting supported the WMD lie to distract from Saudi Arabia.

 

[Axxman300]

a bit telling that they aren't upset with Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia cleaned house after 9-11. Two Saudis suspected in helping AQ were later found dead out in the Saudi desert after being called home.

 

[Axxman300]

... and then the Intelligence Commuting supported the WMD lie to distract from Saudi Arabia.

That is a myth.

Most of Langley was not down with the NSC's claims of WMDs, certainly not at the level claimed. What happened was the NSC set up a separate analyst group made up of "Yes Men" to shape the spotty intel to back their claims. That's how Colin Powell ended up claiming field laundry trucks were mobile chemical weapons labs. And yes, he should have known better since anyone serving at Fort Irwin, Fort Riley, Fort Hood, or Fort Knox could have told him what he was looking at.

More importantly, between 1993 and 2000 the CIA had only one field officer to cover Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan. One guy. Iraq was not a priority for the Clinton Administration, so there was a huge blind-spot for Iraq, and anyone claiming they knew for a fact Saddam had no WMDs was equally a liar. Throw in UNSCOM's multi-year circus in Iraq, and the fact that ALL THE IRAQI GENERALS BELIEVED THAT THEY HAD CHEMICAL WEAPONS and you can see how nothing was definitively clear in any way shape or form.

Also, Wall Street Apes as an anti-American propaganda bot-farm.