jeremyp
Philosopher
How do we know that that is what you are trying to bring to our attention.
You could just stop being lazy.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
You could just stop being lazy.
arthwollipot
Limerick Purist Pronouns: He/Him
???
It's what I ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ posted, it's what I wanted to bring to your ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ attention. Now can we please move on?
jeremyp
Philosopher
Just don’t do it again.
arthwollipot
Limerick Purist Pronouns: He/Him
Do what again? Post what I think? ◊◊◊◊ that.
gabeygoat
Master Poster
this is weird. Arth's posts are perfectly fine,
Blue Mountain
Resident Skeptical Hobbit
Same here, even if I initially disagreed with his method. It was entirely in context and left no doubt about Arthwollipot's intention.
jeremyp
Philosopher
Musk doesn't want people scrutinising X's data privacy measures.
arstechnica.com
He's arguing that it doesn't count anymore because Twitter has been taken over twice since the last time he lost on this point.
Elon Musk tries again to escape FTC audits of X data handling
Musk can't be trusted to protect X user privacy, public commenters warn FTC.
arstechnica.com
He's arguing that it doesn't count anymore because Twitter has been taken over twice since the last time he lost on this point.
dirtywick
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2006
- Messages
- 12,583
Judge upholds Musk Twitter investor fraud verdict
A federal judge rejected Elon Musk's bid to toss the verdict that he defrauded Twitter investors in 2022, leaving up to $2.6bn in damages in play.
thenextweb.com
judge denies bid to drop fraud verdict against elon
Gulliver Foyle
Philosopher
Won't anybody pleeeease think of the Galaxy Nazis‽Judge upholds Musk Twitter investor fraud verdict
A federal judge rejected Elon Musk's bid to toss the verdict that he defrauded Twitter investors in 2022, leaving up to $2.6bn in damages in play.
judge denies bid to drop fraud verdict against elon
Why is he even arguing - it's just pennies to the richest man in the world....
plague311
Great minds think...
Because being a ◊◊◊◊ is free!
jeremyp
Philosopher
No it isn't. Most of Musk's wealth is not liquid.
dirtywick
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2006
- Messages
- 12,583
i think using market cap is a dollar amount of wealth can be extremely misleading. with a lot of these guys, elon included, you're looking at companies with stock priced for massive future growth in tech as if it's already happened and saying he's a trillionaire. that's not going to be an accurate number
I tend to use the trailing dots rather than /s
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
And now Boll is dabbling in showbiz, with Uwe Boll as a ally
:https://www.theguardian.com/film/20...e-hammer-film-free-download-citizen-vigilante
Of course I think this is a very cynical attempt by Uwe Boll to make a comeback by appealing to the extreme right, but he managed to con Muskinto supporting him.
BTW the film is getting the usual cirtical response: 6% at rotten tomatoes.
BOll did an internvew with a UK neo Nazi group to promote the film.
:https://www.theguardian.com/film/20...e-hammer-film-free-download-citizen-vigilante
Of course I think this is a very cynical attempt by Uwe Boll to make a comeback by appealing to the extreme right, but he managed to con Muskinto supporting him.
BTW the film is getting the usual cirtical response: 6% at rotten tomatoes.
BOll did an internvew with a UK neo Nazi group to promote the film.
jeremyp
Philosopher
xAI is now suing the people using Grok to make CSAM images for breach of the terms of service.
arstechnica.com
I think the idea is to set a precedent so they can
a) point to this case when people try to sue them and say "look, it's not us, it's the user".
b) avoid doing anything more to stop people from being able to create CSAM images.
xAI can’t deny Grok makes CSAM anymore. So it’s suing users.
Elon Musk's xAI files first lawsuit against Grok user accused of making child sex images.
arstechnica.com
I think the idea is to set a precedent so they can
a) point to this case when people try to sue them and say "look, it's not us, it's the user".
b) avoid doing anything more to stop people from being able to create CSAM images.
Aren't tools that make it very easy to commit serious crimes usually heavily regulated (unless they're guns in the US?)
IE you're not allowed to just have US note intaglio plates (it's just a collector's item officer!)
They made photocopiers impossible to use for counterfeiting pretty much right out of the gate but they can't figure out how to stop AI from whipping up CSAM for anybody who asks just right?
IE you're not allowed to just have US note intaglio plates (it's just a collector's item officer!)
They made photocopiers impossible to use for counterfeiting pretty much right out of the gate but they can't figure out how to stop AI from whipping up CSAM for anybody who asks just right?
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
I think the Robert Heinlein estate should sue Musk for plagarism....
Not that I think Musk ever read "Stranger In A Strange Land".
Not that I think Musk ever read "Stranger In A Strange Land".