If you haven't heard of Rob Warner you should educate yourself. Known, originally, as Crimebodge on You Tube he's amassed a great body of egregious behaviour by the police. His rebranded channel (Copper Stopper) is here https://copperstopper.org/goodbye-crimebodge-hello-copper-stopper/. You must visit if you haven't already.
Anyway, moving on... we all should expect to be protected from overly aggressive mad men driving on our roads getting involved in moving fracas or "road rage incidents" as we like to call them. Right?
What do we do, though, when it's a police inspector, in plain clothes and off duty who is at large looking for trouble?
We're ◊◊◊◊◊◊ it seems.
If you though that you might be wrong because this cockroach was eventually charged with common assault!
It's a stick on according to all the hard evidence (a video taken by the victims g/friend), statements, radio convo transcripts/recordings. The judicial system will see him off. Wrong!
One handpicked judge later, a judge who has previous for going easy on errant cops and tough on civilian victims would find that due to the force concerned losing interview tapes and radio conversations between our inspector and multiple other involved officers the inspector was not guilty!
It was due to the defence of "self defence" (that old chestnut) not being "disproved". There's a good bit more to it than just what I've outlined here. Watch the video yourself and make your own conclusions.
Any supporters of the good inspector? I'd love to hear your opinions.
Anyway, moving on... we all should expect to be protected from overly aggressive mad men driving on our roads getting involved in moving fracas or "road rage incidents" as we like to call them. Right?
What do we do, though, when it's a police inspector, in plain clothes and off duty who is at large looking for trouble?
We're ◊◊◊◊◊◊ it seems.
If you though that you might be wrong because this cockroach was eventually charged with common assault!
It's a stick on according to all the hard evidence (a video taken by the victims g/friend), statements, radio convo transcripts/recordings. The judicial system will see him off. Wrong!
One handpicked judge later, a judge who has previous for going easy on errant cops and tough on civilian victims would find that due to the force concerned losing interview tapes and radio conversations between our inspector and multiple other involved officers the inspector was not guilty!
It was due to the defence of "self defence" (that old chestnut) not being "disproved". There's a good bit more to it than just what I've outlined here. Watch the video yourself and make your own conclusions.
Any supporters of the good inspector? I'd love to hear your opinions.
