If he is unable to write because of motor coordination difficulties then he is dyspraxic. Being dyspraxic does not equate to severe learning difficulty. If Woody did not have bodily motor coordination difficulties or poor attention deficit then of course he would sit in front of a computer, laptop or tablet and type out his own stuff.
How is it bigotry to point out that Woody does not have severe learning difficulty? Stop lying. I have at no point described Woody as an idiot. The term 'idiot savant' is in quotation marks because that is the colloquial term. Your claim "calling him an “idiot” is a disgusting slur on a handicapped person that shows your underlying sense of your own mental superior to anyone else in the room with you" is a malicious lie on your part.
Nobody has said people with ADHD can't use computers. We are talking about a specific person here: Woody Brown. People can't understand why he can't sit down at a PC, laptop or tablet like anyone else. He has severe autism which includes high anxiety and a compulsion to focus on video films and animations. He concentrates so intently it is hard to get his attention. When his mother and teachers realised Woody was not severely learning disabled but actually gifted, they made an effort to help him realise his intellectual capabilities.
Claiming that Woody communicates by supposed telepathy has not been proven.
When did you get access to his diagnosis?
At least your jokes take one's mind off the current world situation!
You really have some incredible access to information not available to others, whether that be someone's medical diagnosis or videos taken down.
Literally nobody has expressed that view. You do project some extraordinarily dumb ideas onto people you want to disagree with.
By inference. There is a paucity of information on this so I expect there will be a biography along soon explaining his struggles. I feel confident that Woody will not have been accepted on his degree courses as a disabled student without a detailed assessment of his developmental needs and the disabilty support he needed. I understand why people are sceptical. However, I prefer to wait until we have ALL the details before condemning Woody's mother as a fraud - because of <fx deep intake of breath> FC - and claiming Woody's intellectual abilities are near to non-existent and therefore, it would be immoral to facilitate communication with him.
The controversy around FC is to do with the idea that deeply disabled people with severe learning disabilities (SDL) are being exploited by use of communication methods other than by speech. I am not sure why you are assuming ipso facto that this unethical use extends to ALL severely disabled people but I accept that you are utterly convinced Woody's mother is perpetrating a con because Woody is severely disabled. And an angry person on YouTube says so.
I suspect that they may not have had much of a choice. The Americans with Disabilities Act and other laws may have tied their hands.
There is no documented "Ouija board" method to help autistic people communicate. Your essentially saying that Woody and his mother have invented a completely original and revolutionary method, one that looks remarkably similar to a documented scam.
Also known as "pulled it from my arse"
But it doesn't help him to be like any other young man, since he cannot communicate unless his mother is with him. Depriving him of the opportunity to communicate directly with others, if possible, is definitely unethical.