• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed Israel/US Attacks Iran /Yet Another Country/Iran

Meanwhile, I've just heard.

Yes, and if we built far more renewable energy and Blbattery, Europe would be far less dependent on the Strait of Hormuz too. Although probably not for Helium.
If we get the new fusion reactor up and running then we will be independant of having to rely on helium mining as we will have a limitless supply of helium as a by product of hydrogen fusion.
 
If we get the new fusion reactor up and running then we will be independant of having to rely on helium mining as we will have a limitless supply of helium as a by product of hydrogen fusion.
Sadly, breakeven is just the first and possibly simplest engineering hurdle for fusion. With 2008 materials technology, the neuton flux would give a working fusion plant a lifetime of about 18 months (according to an offline article in the IET magazine from then, which stick in my mind)
 
If we get the new fusion reactor up and running then we will be independant of having to rely on helium mining as we will have a limitless supply of helium as a by product of hydrogen fusion.
We should at least wait to have an administration that wouldn't immediately ally with the moon Nazi invasion. Even President Palin was smarter than that.
 
Trump: "If it were up to me, I'd like to keep the oil. I just don't think the people of the United States would really understand it."

Video in link
 
Last edited:
Trump: "We are obliterating their country, and they just don't want to say 'uncle.' But they will. And if they don't, they'll have no bridges, no power plants, no anything. I won't go further because there are other things that are worse than those two, and we might have -- well,…

Video in link
 
God... Anyway, it will be interesting to see if this latest deadline will amount to anything - the Iranians are evidently still not playing ball. It seems to me that a limited ground attack would be on its way, they surely wouldn't ship over all that infantry without actually using them for a ground offensive. Unless of course Iran capitulates but they certainly don't look like they would.
 
Last edited:
Trump on Iran: We sent to some guns. They were supposed to go to the people so they could fight back against these thugs. The people we sent them to kept them. I am upset with a certain group of people and they will pay a big price.

Video in link
 
Reporter: How is it taking care of the Iranian people if you are bombing them?

Trump: The Iranian people, when they don't hear bombs go off, they are upset. They want to hear bombs because they want to be free.

Video in link
 
Trump: "We are obliterating their country, and they just don't want to say 'uncle.' But they will. And if they don't, they'll have no bridges, no power plants, no anything. I won't go further because there are other things that are worse than those two, and we might have -- well,…

Video in link
Obliteration, re-obliteration and re-re-obliteration.
 
Trump: "The Iranian people will fight back as soon as they know they're not gonna be shot, and as soon as they can get weapons. If they had weapons that were going the other way, Iran would give up in two seconds."

Video in link
 
CNN: What about citizens who rely on desalination plants for clean drinking water? Of course the military would rely on that, but so would citizens just to have drinking water

REP. KUSTOFF: Look, the Iranians have to make a decision. My guess is the Iranian people are very supportive of US actions

Link
 
Make your mind up

Trump: We have many alternatives. We can leave right now and it would take them 15 years to rebuild. We can leave right now but I want to finish it up.

Link
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom