• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 2026 Mid-Term election outcomes: US Congress

2026 Mid-Term Election Outcome: US Congress

  • Republicans retain control of House and Senate

    Votes: 8 12.9%
  • Republican House, Democrat Senate

    Votes: 1 1.6%
  • Democrat House, Republican Senate

    Votes: 21 33.9%
  • Democrat House and Senate

    Votes: 25 40.3%
  • On Planet X, Greens take house and senate

    Votes: 7 11.3%

  • Total voters
    62
That's crazy. Crenshaw is politically very conservative and would agree with most of Trump's policies. Was his mistake to not say "I believe everything Trump tells me to believe?"
Crenshaw disagreed with Trump on a couple of points. That was enough to get him exiled.
Trump is not a classical conservative, in case you have not notcied.
 
Lincoln? Hell, it's not even Nixon's!

Almost every time I hear the name Nixon, it always makes me laugh, because the first image I have is him standing there like the greatest caricature of all time, shaking his head in that special way, jowls shaking while raising his hands over his head, displaying two peace signs, and saying, "I am not a crook!"

I have a feeling the fat clown will become the same kind of demented, laughing-stock caricature like Nixon, except it'll be a long time before that becomes really funny like Nixon.

Of course, that's just my opinion, but one thing I will give Nixon credit for, he sort of did have a sense of humor, displayed by his cameo on Laugh-In asking, "Sock it to me?"

That's the second image that always comes to my mind.

Maybe the fat clown could make a cameo on SNL... Yeah, that'll probably never happen. He's too much of a coward to do it.
 
Almost every time I hear the name Nixon, it always makes me laugh, because the first image I have is him standing there like the greatest caricature of all time, shaking his head in that special way, jowls shaking while raising his hands over his head, displaying two peace signs, and saying, "I am not a crook!"

I have a feeling the fat clown will become the same kind of demented, laughing-stock caricature like Nixon, except it'll be a long time before that becomes really funny like Nixon.

Of course, that's just my opinion, but one thing I will give Nixon credit for, he sort of did have a sense of humor, displayed by his cameo on Laugh-In asking, "Sock it to me?"

That's the second image that always comes to my mind.

Maybe the fat clown could make a cameo on SNL... Yeah, that'll probably never happen. He's too much of a coward to do it.
Nixon was dishonest, but at least he was intelligent. That can't be said for the Mango Moron.

I think DT's version of Nixon's "two peace signs, I'm not a crook" could be DT's stupid dancing (if it can be called that).
 
Nixon was dishonest, but at least he was intelligent. That can't be said for the Mango Moron.
And, despite him leaving office in disgrace, Nixon's record was a bit more... mixed. Yes, there was the watergate coverup (not to mention some messy stuff in vietnam). But, he also opened relations with china, signed nuclear control agreements with Russia, and had a part in creating the environmental protection agency. He might not have been a "great" president, but he wasn't quite at the bottom of the presidential rankings either. Trump has no significant "successes" at all. Pretty much everything of significance he did in his first term and the first year of his second term has been negative.

Plus, ultimately nixon had the good sense and esigned. (Later than he should have, and it was in part due to him losing congressional support, but he didn't fight to the bitter end.) I cannot see Trump doing the same thing. (Heck, he lost the 2020 election and supported a terrorist attack as a result.)
 
And, despite him leaving office in disgrace, Nixon's record was a bit more... mixed. Yes, there was the watergate coverup (not to mention some messy stuff in vietnam). But, he also opened relations with china, signed nuclear control agreements with Russia, and had a part in creating the environmental protection agency. He might not have been a "great" president, but he wasn't quite at the bottom of the presidential rankings either. Trump has no significant "successes" at all. Pretty much everything of significance he did in his first term and the first year of his second term has been negative.

Plus, ultimately nixon had the good sense and esigned. (Later than he should have, and it was in part due to him losing congressional support, but he didn't fight to the bitter end.) I cannot see Trump doing the same thing. (Heck, he lost the 2020 election and supported a terrorist attack as a result.)
Schitler would have no qualms about killing millions of people if it maintained his power.
 
And, despite him leaving office in disgrace, Nixon's record was a bit more... mixed. Yes, there was the watergate coverup (not to mention some messy stuff in vietnam). But, he also opened relations with china, signed nuclear control agreements with Russia, and had a part in creating the environmental protection agency. He might not have been a "great" president, but he wasn't quite at the bottom of the presidential rankings either. Trump has no significant "successes" at all. Pretty much everything of significance he did in his first term and the first year of his second term has been negative.

Plus, ultimately nixon had the good sense and esigned. (Later than he should have, and it was in part due to him losing congressional support, but he didn't fight to the bitter end.) I cannot see Trump doing the same thing. (Heck, he lost the 2020 election and supported a terrorist attack as a result.)

And don't forget, he was also instrumental in ending the Vietnam war, but he was also instrumental in getting marijuana listed as schedule one drug despite his own researchers telling him it wasn't that bad.

I think he did it because he hated the hippies who protested the war, and this was his way of making sure they went to jail, but this is just my opinion.

Full Disclosure: I volunteered to join the Air Force in 1973, not knowing Nixon was working to end it, because I mostly wanted to get away from this crazy stepmother my dad had married. You could literally compare her to Cinderella's stepmothers, but that's a story for another day and another time.
 
Last edited:
And don't forget, he was also instrumental in ending the Vietnam war, but he was also instrumental in getting marijuana listed as schedule one drug despite his own researchers telling him it wasn't that bad.

I think he did it because he hated the hippies who protested the war, and this was his way of making sure they went to jail, but this is just my opinion.

Full Disclosure: I volunteered to join the Air Force in 1973, not knowing Nixon was working to end it, because I mostly wanted to get away from this crazy stepmother my dad had married. You could literally compare her to Cinderella's stepmothers, but that's a story for another day and another time.
My husband joined the Navy in 1973, too, (age 18) for pretty much the same reason, but his motive was a controlling stepfather. You could compare his stepfather to Capt. Bligh. Funny thing is, he and his stepfather later developed a loving relationship even if he still barked orders...which my husband just learned to ignore or answer with, "You bellowed?"
 
My husband joined the Navy in 1973, too, (age 18) for pretty much the same reason, but his motive was a controlling stepfather. You could compare his stepfather to Capt. Bligh. Funny thing is, he and his stepfather later developed a loving relationship even if he still barked orders...which my husband just learned to ignore or answer with, "You bellowed?"

I can relate.

I joined when I was seventeen which you could do if your guardian gave their permission.

It's where I learned the "government" wasn't as "honest" as it pretended to be.
 
Last edited:
I can relate.

I joined when I was seventeen which you could do if your guardian gave their permission.
"It's where I learned the "government" wasn't as "honest" as it pretended to be."

Which is exactly what my husband learned. "Sir, son, since you're a trumpet player, you'll be in the band on the West Coast if you sign here". Yep, he got to play reveille at dawn during boot camp. After that, he ended up on a nuclear sub out of Groton, CT.
 
And don't forget, he was also instrumental in ending the Vietnam war, but he was also instrumental in getting marijuana listed as schedule one drug despite his own researchers telling him it wasn't that bad.

I think he did it because he hated the hippies who protested the war, and this was his way of making sure they went to jail, but this is just my opinion.

Full Disclosure: I volunteered to join the Air Force in 1973, not knowing Nixon was working to end it, because I mostly wanted to get away from this crazy stepmother my dad had married. You could literally compare her to Cinderella's stepmothers, but that's a story for another day and another time.
He was working to end it in 72 after working to prolong it in 68.
 
If the Democrats are to take back the Senate, one Republican they need to defeat is Susan Collins of Maine. The battle for the Democrats epitomizes two of the fault lines in the party: youth vs experience and progressivism vs moderation. Chuck Shumer recruited Maine's sitting governor, Janet Mills. She's moderate, and has experience winning statewide elections; she's also 78. The progressive who appears to be leading in recent polls is a 41-year-old oyster farmer who has never held an elective office named Graham Platner.
If the Democrats want to ensure the win, they should probably go with Mills. However, given who votes in the primaries, I expect Platner to get the nod. We'll know on June 9.
 
If the Democrats are to take back the Senate, one Republican they need to defeat is Susan Collins of Maine....Chuck Shumer recruited Maine's sitting governor, Janet Mills. She's moderate, and has experience winning statewide elections; she's also 78. The progressive who appears to be leading in recent polls is a 41-year-old oyster farmer who has never held an elective office named Graham Platner.
If the Democrats want to ensure the win, they should probably go with Mills. However, given who votes in the primaries, I expect Platner to get the nod. We'll know on June 9.
I think this has been discussed previously before...

One of the issues with ANY "new guy" is not just their progressiveness, etc., but the fact that they might have unexpected skeletons in their closet.

There was some controversy over Platner a few months ago when it was discovered that he had a tatoo that supposedly had ties to nazi germany. (He went through the military with the tatoo, so its likely most people don't know about its legacy/association, but its the type of thing that could be a problem in a close race.)

See: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/21/graham-platner-tattoo-nazi-00617686

Of course I could point out the irony of a democrat having problem with "nazi stuff" when Trump actually called Nazis "fine people", but that's another discussion.
 
Democrats have issues with Nazi stuff, it's not ironic. They'll call out anyone of any political position that does Nazi stuff or endorses it.

It's MAGA that only has issue with Nazi stuff if it isn't their party doing the Nazi stuff. Otherwise, they love doing Nazi stuff.
 
If the Democrats are to take back the Senate, one Republican they need to defeat is Susan Collins of Maine. The battle for the Democrats epitomizes two of the fault lines in the party: youth vs experience and progressivism vs moderation. Chuck Shumer recruited Maine's sitting governor, Janet Mills. She's moderate, and has experience winning statewide elections; she's also 78. The progressive who appears to be leading in recent polls is a 41-year-old oyster farmer who has never held an elective office named Graham Platner.
If the Democrats want to ensure the win, they should probably go with Mills. However, given who votes in the primaries, I expect Platner to get the nod. We'll know on June 9.

I always see progressives get ◊◊◊◊ on but overall they seem to win races. I don't know if a lot of voters really want moderate stances anymore, considering the temperature of the US. I'd like to see the prog give it a go and see what happens.

Look at Fetterman. He was a moderate and now he's just a Republican in Dem clothing. I'd rather pass on getting another one of those.
 
I always see progressives get ◊◊◊◊ on but overall they seem to win races. I don't know if a lot of voters really want moderate stances anymore, considering the temperature of the US. I'd like to see the prog give it a go and see what happens.

We are talking Maine here, not New York City.

Look at Fetterman. He was a moderate...
No, that's not true. Fetterman ran as a progressive and endorsed Bernie Sanders in 2016. For that matter, the much-maligned Krysten Sinema also came of the progressive wing--she started out as a Green Party member.
 
We are talking Maine here, not New York City.


No, that's not true. Fetterman ran as a progressive and endorsed Bernie Sanders in 2016. For that matter, the much-maligned Krysten Sinema also came of the progressive wing--she started out as a Green Party member.
that kind of demonstrates theplague311's point, though. Fetterman and Sinema both cosplayed as progressives to win in purple states, where we constantly hear how progressives can't win. Also remember that Wisconsin's 3-term junior Senator is a lesbian who supports Medicare For All.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom