p0lka
Illuminator
Is 'transmale' a slur? If so then I'm sorry to have used it, oops.
When me and someone else are both talking about one person, for example Helen, and I say 'so what do they want for Christmas?', that's incorrect usage of they? I've been using it like that all my life.The singular usage of "they" is correctly confined to situations where the sex of the person is either unknown (as in your example) or indeterminate, for example when describing a hypothetical situation.
There is a somewhat massive difference between interpreting ambiguous language in the law, and a grown ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ man acting like he doesn't know that 'they' has been used as a gender neutral pronoun for goddamned generations.Nearly every attempt to push trans rights forward proceeded through word games, especially via the courts.
Nope. Would have made no difference - NHS is fully captured.If the person had said that they didn't want any males in the room instead of men, do you think it might have been harder for the bosses to argue about it?
They are the sameNo, it's mixing up gender and sex together as being the same thing;
No. Separating them exacerbates the issues. It allows TRAs to seize upon gender as the important part, and declare sex as unimportant. Then everything can be based in self declared gender and you end up with men being in places they have no business being.which is not going to solve the problem, instead of treating them differently as they are.
Utter bollocks. It has never meant that - you just made that up from whole cloth!That is precisely the problem with "trans identifying male". For decades, the 'trans' part meant 'transitioning' towards the identified gender
Examples of this literature?and a transgender identified woman is still used in the literature to describe MtF transpeople.
Only to youUsing 'transgender identified male' sounds like someone who is transitioning/transitioned to male
Only about two decades - i.e. about the last five minutes in terms of language going back thousands of years!Transwoman is the general label used for decades and universally to describe a MtF transperson.

Rubbish. It is the only term that accurately describes observable, objective scientific reality.The sole benefit of using 'trans identified male' is that it is universally considered a slur, so it's users are dogwhistling their bashing position unambiguously. That's handy to get debaters sorted quickly.
No, it isn't. It would be unwise to believeIs 'transmale' a slur? If so then I'm sorry to have used it, oops.
<inane irrelevant bollocks snipped>
there is no 'across, beyond, or through' that even makes sense with regard to gender.
LOL, the factual cited etymology is "irrelevant bollocks' and you go merrily on with your fantasy that the word was intentionally constructed with no evidence at all. You're priceless.If course there is... "across gender" works perfectly -
No, it isn't. Everyone here knows exactly what it means, there is zero ambiguity.That is precisely the problem with "trans identifying male".
It is not universally considering a slur. The TRAs might universally call it a slur (and even there I won't take your word for it), but they don't get to tell me what I mean. I don't know why you think they earned that authority.The sole benefit of using 'trans identified male' is that it is universally considered a slur
In this thread, which is That Thread. Newcomers invariably don't know what the hell you are talking about and need it explained, because the backwards structure is not heard outside tranny-bashing circles.No, it isn't. Everyone here knows exactly what it means, there is zero ambiguity.
You still don't need to. I still linked earlier to an online dictionary definition to remove all doubt and for your viewing enjoyment.It is not universally considering a slur. The TRAs might universally call it a slur (and even there I won't take your word for it),
"...neither more nor less."but they don't get to tell me what I mean. I don't know why you think they earned that authority.
Ye gads.Point one was referring to the red part of my post in which I used the words I have taken to use in this thread to lessen confusion, but I can use transwoman instead if you want? If i'm actually causing more confusion by using transmale i'll switch. I thought I was being clearer by using transmale, as that refers to the sex of the transperson and not the gender vagueness.
Point two was referring to the underlined part of my post in which I used the words of the judgement, not my own.
A simple, 'no' would suffice. But you dare not say it. Men abusing women's boundaries is fine by you as long as you don't have to describe it properly.See my previous post for the explanation of point one and two.
The judgement says they didn't do anything wrong as far as I can tell, what do you think they did wrong? as I'm not seeing it.
There is no such thing as 'gender' except as a synonym of 'sex'.No, it's mixing up gender and sex together as being the same thing; which is not going to solve the problem, instead of treating them differently as they are.
So, it seems that, to you, 'gender' means 'which sex someone looks most like'. Instead of saying, "She's a very manly woman," or "She's a very manly-looking woman," you decide that she has a female sex but a male gender, and then use "they" to talk about her. OK, I mean, you do you, but it's mental.Edit: look at the previous post about buck angel, they are more manly than I will ever be, they've got muscles and a beard and everything! But they are female. Gender and sex are independent of each other as one is social, the other is biological.
The adjectival term I use (when I remember) is "trans-identifying". It can be applied to "man", "woman", "boy", "girl", "male", or "female". Nouns are the labels we give things as their primary identity (subjectively, of course - identifying is a subjective activity). So adding "trans-identifying" changes "male" no more than "self-levitating" would. So it's not a personal glossary I'm requiring anyone to refer to: "male", etc., are already defined, and "trans-identifying" is perfectly comprehensible to anyone who hasn't been living under a stone for the last fifteen years. If you can't use adjectives and nouns, it's not my problem.That is precisely the problem with "trans identifying male". For decades, the 'trans' part meant 'transitioning' towards the identified gender, and a transgender identified woman is still used in the literature to describe MtF transpeople. Using 'transgender identified male' sounds like someone who is transitioning/transitioned to male, which is the opposite of your intent. As you say, ya really can't run around with personal glossaries to interpret what individuals mean when using terms in their opposite sense.
Is 'transmale' a slur? If so then I'm sorry to have used it, oops.
Also, grow a pair. Focus on critical thinking instead of self-censorship.No, it isn't. It would be unwise to believeeverythinganything he tells you
Well, assuming you know Helen is female, hell yeah, that's weird. Why wouldn't you ask what she wants for Christmas? Is English not your first langage?When me and someone else are both talking about one person, for example Helen, and I say 'so what do they want for Christmas?', that's incorrect usage of they? I've been using it like that all my life.
What, that Wiktionary one? This is priceless - did you bother to put "transwoman" in the search box there?I still linked earlier to an online dictionary definition to remove all doubt and for your viewing enjoyment.
(My bold) Oh, if only you'd all remembered to put a space in there, you wouldn't have threatened the mental health and probably actual lives of so many people!Noun
transwoman (plural transwomen)
(often derogatory, offensive) Alternative spelling of trans woman.
Coordinate term: transman
See how that works? "Trans-identifying" / "Trans-identified" (adjective modifying...) "male."Trans woman is often spelled with a space, with trans as an adjective modifying the noun woman, similar to Asian woman, tall woman, fat woman, etc.
You do realize we weren't talking about the term transwoman, with or without a space, right?What, that Wiktionary one? This is priceless - did you bother to put "transwoman" in the search box there?
(My bold) Oh, if only you'd all remembered to put a space in there, you wouldn't have threatened the mental health and probably actual lives of so many people!
See how that works? "Trans-identifying" / "Trans-identified" (adjective modifying...) "male."
I use a hyphen to emphasize adjectival phrases. We're wary of man-eating sharks, but we don't mind a man eating shark.
What?! How dare you suggest it doesn't matter whether there's a space in it?!You do realize we weren't talking about the term transwoman, with or without a space, right?