Cont: Musk buys Twitter II

[Gulliver Foyle]

That is correct.

To get everybody up to speed, Elon Musk's AI chatbot that is integrated into X has been generating CSAM at user's requests and has flooded the platform with it, and Musk doesn't seem too bothered. Nor do the people who've come to this thread to hand-wave it away.

Draw your own conclusions from that.

It's an established pattern of behaviour for the Galaxy Nazi. He did personally reinstate a poster who had been banned (by his own moderating team) for posting CSAM of a real child.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/twitter-elon-musk-dom-lucre-child-sexual-abuse/

I would say there's something seriously wrong with Musk, but that's clear to the world for years.

 

[Darat]

According to Musk it is fascist to want to prevent people producing, distributing and profititing from CSAM.

 

[arthwollipot]

Behind Grok's mass digital undressing lies an 'unsurprising' truth

The X AI is not creating sexually explicit images of women on its own, but the software "facilitates their abuse" acting on the requests of men "eager to violate women".

www.abc.net.au

 

[Andy_Ross]

X to stop Grok AI from undressing images of real people after backlash

X's change was announced hours after California's top prosecutor said the state was probing the spread of sexualised AI deepfakes, including of children, generated by the AI model.Elon Musk's AI model Grok will no longer be able to edit photos of real people to show them in revealing clothing in jurisdictions where it is illegal, after widespread concern over sexualised AI deepfakes.

"We have implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing," reads an announcement on X.

Elon Musk's X to block Grok from undressing images of real people

Grok will no longer allow users to remove clothing from images of real people in jurisdictions where it is illegal.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[The Great Zaganza]

butbutbut free speech!!

 

[steenkh]

Elon Musk's AI model Grok will no longer be able to edit photos of real people to show them in revealing clothing
in jurisdictions where it is illegal , after widespread concern over sexualised AI deepfakes.

Doesn't this simply mean that anyone in such a jurisdiction can use a VPN to fake the origin, and make the image anyway?

 

[jimbob]

Doesn't this simply mean that anyone in such a jurisdiction can use a VPN to fake the origin, and make the image anyway?

I'm not sure it's going to work for the above reason.

And again it shows that there was a relatively trivial amount of work to fix this but they neglected to do so.

 

[johnny karate]

I'm not sure it's going to work for the above reason.

And again it shows that there was a relatively trivial amount of work to fix this but they neglected to do so.

Pedocon Theory remains undefeated.

 

[arthwollipot]

I've written to my local MP asking him to add X, formerly known as Twitter, to the list of social media platforms restricted to under-16s, and to stop using the platform himself for his own political purposes.

 

[junkshop]

I've written to my local MP asking him to add X, formerly known as Twitter, to the list of social media platforms restricted to under-16s, and to stop using the platform himself for his own political purposes.

X(fT) is already on that list, isn't it?

 

[arthwollipot]

X(fT) is already on that list, isn't it?

I may have just embarrassed myself in front of my local member of parliament.

At any rate, I also asked him to stop using the platform so it wasn't completely wasted.

 

[jimbob]

Mother of one of Elon Musk’s children sues xAI over sexual images - https://giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/actions/redeem/b82ebdf8-dcb2-4bbd-aa09-dd0e8dd5e46a via @FT

3 views possible with that link.

Ashley St Clair, the influencer and mother of one of Elon Musk’s children, has sued the billionaire’s AI company, accusing its Grok chatbot of creating fake sexual imagery of her without her consent.

Suing xAI in New York state, claiming it continued to make images of her after she asked it to stop, including one of her as a 14 year old.

The response from xAI was to remove her premium listing, verification checkmark, and ability to monetize her account.

She's also seeking a restraining order to prevent it making such images of her.

The case has been referred to the federal court.

xAI is counter suing claiming that she breached her terms of service by suing in New York and not Texas. (Surely that can have no merit? Any lawyer herel

 

[JayUtah]

xAI is counter suing claiming that she breached her terms of service by suing in New York and not Texas. (Surely that can have no merit? Any lawyer herel

IANAL, but I know the answer because choice-of-venue clauses are ubiquitous in contracts. Yes you can be constrained by the terms of service to have the disputes heard in a particular venue, or by binding arbitration. This is an ongoing pain point in American law. But it's currently quite legal.

 

[jeremyp]

You have significantly more control over your Google search results than you do the algorithms that control your Twitter feed.

I’m also not aware of a CSAM-generating program being integrated into Google.

A Google search might show you pictures of real children being really abused, if you are not careful, not just AI generated stuff.

 

[Darat]

A Google search might show you pictures of real children being really abused, if you are not careful, not just AI generated stuff.

Shouldn't do- even if you switch off "safe search" Google has server side tools to detect such images.

 

[johnny karate]

A Google search might show you pictures of real children being really abused, if you are not careful, not just AI generated stuff.

Let’s see your evidence for this claim.

 

[JayUtah]

IANAL, but I know the answer because choice-of-venue clauses are ubiquitous in contracts. Yes you can be constrained by the terms of service to have the disputes heard in a particular venue, or by binding arbitration. This is an ongoing pain point in American law. But it's currently quite legal.

I'm compelled by my better half to point out that the countersuit is highly irregular.

If you are party to a contract that establishes venue for disputes arising out of the contract (as almost all contracts do), then you are indeed compelled to file your claim in the appropriate court. But the remedy for filing it elsewhere is usually just a transfer of the case to the appropriate jurisdiction. It's just paperwork. To countersue someone for breach of contract because they filed an action in the wrong venue is unheard of. Musk is being a jerk.

 

[junkshop]

...Musk is being a jerk.

I am shocked. Who'da thunk it?

 

[plague311]

Musk is being a jerk.

Next you'll tell me he doesn't play his own video games and pays other people to do it for him...or maybe something even more outrageous like that he's a nepo baby or something.

 

[arthwollipot]

Let’s see your evidence for this claim.

You do not want to be seeing evidence of this claim. You do not want to be soliciting evidence for this claim. Evidence for this claim would be highly illegal to be in possession of.