Trump's promised ICE raids have begun

[theprestige]

"Aggresively"

She wasn't there by accident.

Wow. Just wow. Just plain psychotic.

Cars are deadly weapons.

Incorrect. Plain and simple.

Not plain, not simple.

 

[theprestige]

Good thing you don't write law enforcement policy and training manuals.

No doubt.

 

[kookbreaker]

She wasn't there by accident.

So that's a death sentence for you, huh. Protest and get killed, fine by theprestige.

Cars are deadly weapons.

Not at that speed. The ICE agent slipping on actual ice shown in this thread took more damage than that car could ever deliver at such a short distance if it managed to hit him.

Not plain, not simple.

Yes it is. You are wrong.

 

[Reformed Offlian]

I generally hew to the principle that once you start operating a motor vehicle aggressively around law enforcement, you need to be shot. Or otherwise shut down with extreme prejudice.

But don't call me fascist.

 

[kookbreaker]

No doubt.

Your ideas would fill the courts with liability suits and cause much more harm than your beloved shootings would ever prevent but you do you.

 

[theprestige]

But don't call me fascist.

I wasn't planning to, but now you mention it...

 

[kookbreaker]

I wasn't planning to, but now you mention it...

FYI, theprestige is in Pizza Cutter mode in case anyone couldn't figure it out.

 

[arthwollipot]

The reason was someone operating a motor vehicle aggressively around law enforcement. That's an automatic needs shooting, as far as I'm concerned.

That's an absolutely psychopathic thing to say.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Inciting violence.

They all fall in to line as usual

NEWSMAX: Do you think it's long past time for Tim Walz and Jacob Frey to do charged for clearly inciting violence against federal agents? Is there something Congress can do?

REP. SHERI BIGGS: Well, I certainly hope so, and I hope that'll be on the table for discussion this week. It's un-American.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2010723763432645103

And a follow up: should they also be charged with excessive squeaking whilst fashioning balloon animals; applauding at the end of a musical movement rather than holding, as is proper, until the end of the symphony; and finally, chuckling at their own bad Sean Connery impressions such as “Hello, Pushy?” You know, as long as I’m making ◊◊◊◊ up.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

He still won't love you, Junior.

Imagine going through life with the realization you’re just a generic-store-brand Donald Trump.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Good argument

MacCallum: A lot of the celebrities were wearing these buttons that say be good in honor of Renee Good

Bovino: What about the angel moms? How about an angel mom pin? They never seem to talk about that.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2010807714071617544

A whatabout spotted in the wild! Nice!

 

[stanfr]

Cars are deadly weapons.

You know what else are deadly weapons? Burritos. I propose that should be an automatic needs shooting, kill anyone eating a burrito.

 

[The Great Zaganza]

The ICE raids are a war of the unemployable on the employed

 

[lionking]

She wasn't there by accident.


Cars are deadly weapons.


Not plain, not simple.

I thought you were better than this. I was wrong.

 

[Mojo]

I generally hew to the principle that once you start operating a motor vehicle aggressively around law enforcement, you need to be shot. Or otherwise shut down with extreme prejudice. Same as when you start waving around a gun or any other deadly weapon.

It's not like she was driving "past" government agents by accident, or out of mental confusion*.

The reason was someone operating a motor vehicle aggressively around law enforcement. That's an automatic needs shooting, as far as I'm concerned. Peaceful operation, the aggressor would have parked blocks away, and proceeded to her peaceful protest on foot.

Nobody uses a motor vehicle to disrupt an armed police operation unless they mean violence. Or they're an idiot behind the wheel of a motor vehicle. Either way.

Just checking: this is "sarcasm", right?

 

[Pixel42]

Just checking: this is "sarcasm", right?

The alternative is that this poster genuinely believes that driving slowly away from a bunch of men who are ordering the driver to get out of her car, despite the driver having committed no offence and them having no authority to do so, is a crime worthy of being shot in the face.

 

[steenkh]

The alternative is that this poster genuinely believes that driving slowly away from a bunch of men who are ordering the driver to get out of her car, despite the driver having committed no offence and them having no authority to do so, is a crime worthy of being shot in the face.

Indeed, or that trying to drive away is "agression".

 

[Jack by the hedge]

The reason was someone operating a motor vehicle aggressively ...

How aggressively? Deliberately aimed at the shooter, as the regime claim? Absolutely not. Did she even "floor it" as some here have insisted? Again, no. She pulled away in a controlled manner, after turning the wheel way over to avoid the shooter. He helpfully provided us with video evidence that he watched her do that in her last few seconds. And you'll see she backed up first to give room. Do you think she backed up "aggressively"?

 

[Mojo]

The alternative is that this poster genuinely believes that driving slowly away from a bunch of men who are ordering the driver to get out of her car, despite the driver having committed no offence and them having no authority to do so, is a crime worthy of being shot in the face.

Well, it's hard to tell, isn't it?

 

[Andy_Ross]

So it's just victim-blaming all the way down, then.

Always