• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Musk buys Twitter II

johnny karate said:
Starmer has made it pretty clear that it's not just "people in bikinis" but rather the CSAM that is the problem.

But thanks for letting everyone know where you come down on the issue by posting CSAM apologist propaganda.
Click to expand...
Yeah, in deciding on how far to go to protect your cult, I'd think people would understand that their blind devotion should stop somewhere short of proclaiming they don't understand the difference between sexually depicting adults in bikinis and doing the same for little children. That's what worries me about the Elonia-MAGA cult members, though, they just appear to be running 100% on autopilot. No matter what their idols do, no matter how absurd, ridiculous, or terrible, they think they have to step in to defend them. Sad.
 
Safe-Keeper said:
Yeah, in deciding on how far to go to protect your cult, I'd think people would understand that their blind devotion should stop somewhere short of proclaiming they don't understand the difference between sexually depicting adults in bikinis and doing the same for little children. That's what worries me about the Elonia-MAGA cult members, though, they just appear to be running 100% on autopilot. No matter what their idols do, no matter how absurd, ridiculous, or terrible, they think they have to step in to defend them. Sad.
Click to expand...

“I’m against CSAM” seems like the easiest layup ever and yet they can’t manage it. Pretty obvious conclusion to draw from that.
 
That is correct.

To get everybody up to speed, Elon Musk's AI chatbot that is integrated into X has been generating CSAM at user's requests and has flooded the platform with it, and Musk doesn't seem too bothered. Nor do the people who've come to this thread to hand-wave it away.

Draw your own conclusions from that.
 
johnny karate said:
That is correct.

To get everybody up to speed, Elon Musk's AI chatbot that is integrated into X has been generating CSAM at user's requests and has flooded the platform with it, and Musk doesn't seem too bothered. Nor do the people who've come to this thread to hand-wave it away.

Draw your own conclusions from that.
Click to expand...
I recently complained on this forum about the prevalence of porn on X.
I count myself lucky not to have this sort show up while browsing.
 
EHocking said:
I recently complained on this forum about the prevalence of porn on X.
I count myself lucky not to have this sort show up while browsing.
Click to expand...
Not sure where you are in the world but you should be very careful. In the UK, for example, it is a serious criminal offence to have any such material, that it was thrown up by the system with no input by you cannot be used as a defence, it's what is often described as a "strict liability" crime, your intent has no bearing on if the crime of viewing/possessing has occured.
 
johnny karate said:
That is correct.

To get everybody up to speed, Elon Musk's AI chatbot that is integrated into X has been generating CSAM at user's requests and has flooded the platform with it, and Musk doesn't seem too bothered. Nor do the people who've come to this thread to hand-wave it away.

Draw your own conclusions from that.
Click to expand...
There's no CSAM in my feed, but there is some mildly sexualised material. e.g. women's nipples falling out of their dresses etc.
 
jeremyp said:
There's no CSAM in my feed, but there is some mildly sexualised material. e.g. women's nipples falling out of their dresses etc.
Click to expand...
So far.

Unless X has now taken action to stop X creating and publishing CSAM I would be very wary of using X in any way that you can't 100% control. It sounds like personal "feeds" aren't under a user's total control, that X populates them for you?
 
Darat said:
So far.

Unless X has now taken action to stop X creating and publishing CSAM I would be very wary of using X in any way that you can't 100% control. It sounds like personal "feeds" aren't under a user's total control, that X populates them for you?
Click to expand...
I understand the risks, but, frankly, that's the whole internet. If you Google the wrong search term you may get to accidentally see stuff you shouldn't.
 
jeremyp said:
I understand the risks, but, frankly, that's the whole internet. If you Google the wrong search term you may get to accidentally see stuff you shouldn't.
Click to expand...
About a decade ago I bought a motorcycle and my boss told me to get a battery tender. For some reason it stuck in my head as "battery stranger" and that was an awkward as hell google search.
 
plague311 said:
About a decade ago I bought a motorcycle and my boss told me to get a battery tender. For some reason it stuck in my head as "battery stranger" and that was an awkward as hell google search.
Click to expand...

My rather naive born again Xtian older brother was engaged in an engineering project and came to regret googling 'O-Rings'.
 
jeremyp said:
I understand the risks, but, frankly, that's the whole internet. If you Google the wrong search term you may get to accidentally see stuff you shouldn't.
Click to expand...

You have significantly more control over your Google search results than you do the algorithms that control your Twitter feed.

I’m also not aware of a CSAM-generating program being integrated into Google.
 
Darat said:
Not sure where you are in the world but you should be very careful. In the UK, for example, it is a serious criminal offence to have any such material, that it was thrown up by the system with no input by you cannot be used as a defence, it's what is often described as a "strict liability" crime, your intent has no bearing on if the crime of viewing/possessing has occured.
Click to expand...
Frankly it’s got to the stage that I feel like closing most, if not all, of any social accounts I have anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom