• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread Pronouns and expectations

Status
Not open for further replies.
So I say again, if you want me (and others) to seriously consider your own point of view, statements such as (yours above) in this discussion imply that you do not care about my, or others personal situations, and do not work to advance understanding.
This is why I suggested that you are "resisting".

Your personal situation, your contacts, your circles, don't exist in a vacuum. You are part of a society. You can either try to make society better and kinder for everyone, or you can retreat into your little bubble and say "◊◊◊◊ you I've got mine".

When you go to the store, you are impacting someone. When you pick your kids up from school, you are impacting someone. Every time you walk down the street, you are impacting someone. When you get in a plumber to fix that leaky pipe, you are impacting someone. And when you are posting on the internet, you are impacting someone.

It costs no effort to be kind.

And that is the meat of it for a lot of us. This person was clocking as male to you, so you used the correct pronoun English speakers use for a male- he. Upon realizing it may not be the preferred pronoun, you checked. So ok, done and done. That's what I was asking you about. Is it cool to use the correct pronoun till you are told of a preference otherwise (no, not everyone agrees with your assertion of what is correct, and you are causing needless confusion since the very topic is 'which is correct?').
No, it's not cool. I was realising that I might have been making a mistake and misgendering him, so I took steps to correct myself.

I agree with your handling of a person who could go either way. That was the cool and respectful thing to do. But for the vast majority, the clocking suffices, and it feels very much like a comedy routine to pretend you have no idea what a typical presenting guy or gal would prefer to be called. In my neck of the woods, it would be taken as an insult to ask a guy if he was a man or woman, kind of like obliquely saying that he don't look like no man to you.

And I'm pretty sure that's the problem. I want to be inclusive, but I don't expect everyday interactions to be phony to reinforce it. If a man, woman, transwoman, or platypus-kin furry was to see yours truly, I don't think anyone would have anything that needed to get cleared up about my gender. Pretending so, even with the best of inclusive intentions, is insulting to all parties, especially the transperson.
Indeed, 99% of the time there is very little reason not to assume the default. But the 1% of the time when there is, it's very important. Better to be safe and make sure. I recently removed it from my sig but one of my favourite YouTubers Ginny Di once said "If it's easy to avoid potential harm, I would rather do it unnecessarily than risk hurting someone." I try to live my life by that philosophy.

...My only caveat is that, IMO, the person for whom it is an issue should be the one taking the lead in such situations and not expect others to be the first to ask.

I just recalled that in a pharmacy that I frequent every employee has their gender identity written on their name tag. That certainly simplifies thing in that particular situation.
Exactly. Like I said, those of my acquaintance who are at most risk of being misgendered always proactively share their pronouns up front. All you have to do is listen to them.

As I am thinking this thing through I am realizing that the pronoun issue as it relates to casual encounters in my life is really no different than any other aspect of people I encounter. I am not a "people person". I an very much a loner and have very little interest in other people. I am superficially pleasant to people because it smooths over such encounters. I am not a "chatty" person and quickly get bored with casual and aimless conversations.
Me too. Very much me too. The difference is that I do happen to have some people in my life who are transgender and nonbinary, and I want to make life for them as easy as I can.

I do not tell people my own personal issues. It is none of their business.
You tell people your name, presumably, when you have to have dealings with them. It's as easy to remember someone's pronouns as it is to remember their name. And if you forget both because you never see them again, that's fine.

Yes, and in my post above I think in reflection I would stick with "prefer" bacause "correct" invites disagreement and definition, the very thing that seems so often to get in the way of simple courtesy. You can say I shouldn't prefer something but you can't say I don't.
There are certainly situations where "prefer" is fine. Language is flexible. But if someone says "my pronouns are they/them" they're not stating a preference, they are stating a fact. That's all I'm saying.
 
This is why I suggested that you are "resisting".

Your personal situation, your contacts, your circles, don't exist in a vacuum. You are part of a society. You can either try to make society better and kinder for everyone, or you can retreat into your little bubble and say "◊◊◊◊ you I've got mine".

When you go to the store, you are impacting someone. When you pick your kids up from school, you are impacting someone. Every time you walk down the street, you are impacting someone. When you get in a plumber to fix that leaky pipe, you are impacting someone. And when you are posting on the internet, you are impacting someone.

It costs no effort to be kind.


No, it's not cool. I was realising that I might have been making a mistake and misgendering him, so I took steps to correct myself.


Indeed, 99% of the time there is very little reason not to assume the default. But the 1% of the time when there is, it's very important. Better to be safe and make sure. I recently removed it from my sig but one of my favourite YouTubers Ginny Di once said "If it's easy to avoid potential harm, I would rather do it unnecessarily than risk hurting someone." I try to live my life by that philosophy.


Exactly. Like I said, those of my acquaintance who are at most risk of being misgendered always proactively share their pronouns up front. All you have to do is listen to them.


Me too. Very much me too. The difference is that I do happen to have some people in my life who are transgender and nonbinary, and I want to make life for them as easy as I can.


You tell people your name, presumably, when you have to have dealings with them. It's as easy to remember someone's pronouns as it is to remember their name. And if you forget both because you never see them again, that's fine.


There are certainly situations where "prefer" is fine. Language is flexible. But if someone says "my pronouns are they/them" they're not stating a preference, they are stating a fact. That's all I'
In a polite world preference ought to be all that is needed for social situations, but I can see how it might be read wrong by someone who has faced confrontational jerks who are waiting to pounce. Whether any other form would be better then seems doubtful. If you say "my pronouns are..." you are still not discussing why, and there is no good reason for anyone, except perhaps in a medical office, to say "no they're not!" In any case my initial point was that I think angrysoba's imagined dilemma was unnecessarily detailed. You can choose any of various ways, but asking what your pronouns are, or what you use, or what you prefer is a simple question with a simple answer that ought to suffice.
 
Last edited:
If one actually complied, the result would be the same without ideological implication, simply politeness.
That does seem to be anethanma for some folk regarding this issue, including the religious connotations.

I don't use my preferred names for other people because that would be rude, I don't use my preferred pronouns for other people because that would be rude.
 
....snip...

There are certainly situations where "prefer" is fine. Language is flexible. But if someone says "my pronouns are they/them" they're not stating a preference, they are stating a fact. That's all I'm saying.
Since pronoun usage appears to be becoming more decoupled from being set by one fact (which was regarding (apparent) biological sex) then they are moving to be preferences. So in your example they are stating what their preferred pronouns are, and that is what is a fact. Whether other people use a person's preference is then down to whether those folk are jerks or not.
 
Personally I do not see what the fuss is about. As others have said, if someone wants to be called by certain pronouns, who am I to quibble about that?
I've always found it a bit odd as when I talk directly to someone it is irrelevant as I use 'you' or their name, pronouns only really seem to come into question when talking about someone (either directly or in writing) when the person is not expected to hear or read it, but eh, being polite costs nothing and often means a lot.
 
Personally I do not see what the fuss is about. As others have said, if someone wants to be called by certain pronouns, who am I to quibble about that?
I've always found it a bit odd as when I talk directly to someone it is irrelevant as I use 'you' or their name, pronouns only really seem to come into question when talking about someone (either directly or in writing) when the person is not expected to hear or read it, but eh, being polite costs nothing and often means a lot.

I often refer to 3rd persons in a conversation by name. Too many times if several people among that group are involved the person I am talking with will mistake what I said about whom.
And it comes back to bite me.
People don't use reading comprehension skills nor listen fully a lot of the time.
Clarity from the start helps eliminate the margin of error.
That and I won't talk about 3rd party folks unless required now.

Being online there is no way to tell the reader has been drinking and will misread and rage post something. Especially if a disagreement is in play.
It's not possible to reason nor shut them up online. All one can do is treat it like dealing with a monster.
Dealt with a lot of that with maggats back in '15 and '16 on another site. That site has since imploded.
 
Last edited:
Being polite does cost quite a lot sometimes. To others, I mean. That's why a while back I decided to stick to the sex-based pronouns when I know what someone's sex is. The cost of being polite, so as not to offend the person being talked about, is that it reinforces the idea that people can choose what sex they are, which leads to all manner of actual harm (as opposed to hurt feelings), in particular, to children and young people, anyone vulnerable, those susceptible to irrational ideation, through 'gender affirmation'. And those harms are enormous, unimaginable to most of us: becoming sterile, losing sexual arousal and ability to orgasm, becoming a life-long medical patient, and having increased likelihood of contracting various diseases, early death... that's before we consider the mental and social harms. These harms are commonly referred to as 'gender-affirming health care,' and they are the worst medical scandal humanity has ever seen.
 
Being polite does cost quite a lot sometimes. To others, I mean. That's why a while back I decided to stick to the sex-based pronouns when I know what someone's sex is. The cost of being polite, so as not to offend the person being talked about, is that it reinforces the idea that people can choose what sex they are, which leads to all manner of actual harm (as opposed to hurt feelings), in particular, to children and young people, anyone vulnerable, those susceptible to irrational ideation, through 'gender affirmation'. And those harms are enormous, unimaginable to most of us: becoming sterile, losing sexual arousal and ability to orgasm, becoming a life-long medical patient, and having increased likelihood of contracting various diseases, early death... that's before we consider the mental and social harms. These harms are commonly referred to as 'gender-affirming health care,' and they are the worst medical scandal humanity has ever seen.

This. It also leads to women being unable to articulate their case for boys and men being excluded from female facilities. A request that "she", a "transgirl", should be excluded from girls' athletics events sounds mean and unjustified. (It also leads to uninitiated readers thinking that these meanies are trying to exclude a girl who wants to be a boy.) To make the position clear it is essential to be able to say that the person who should be excluded is a boy and refer to him as "he".

Same with prisons. "She should not be in a women's prison" and "he should not be in a women's prison" are very different sentences. And for changing rooms, showers, dormitories and all the rest. We are immediately placed on the back foot and in a near-impossible position if we are forced to adopt the language of the trans cult when discussing these issues.
 
I'm not the one who brought bathrooms into a conversation about being polite and kind to others. You are just looking for an excuse to crap on someone you see as beneath you. It's very sad.
Indeed, this thread started out, at least, to be about how we talk to, and occasionally of, others. And as such I've found it interesting and thought-provoking. There are plenty of ways and plenty of places to argue about policy, but the relentless intrusion of policy into our discourse, the apparent insistence that you cannot ever let your moral and political beliefs go unexpressed, makes our lives (I think) burdensome and unnecessarily contentious. I may of course be wrong, as I often am, and I may care a whole lot less about the social decay that bothers many, as I almost certainly do; but I am not entirely convinced that an atmosphere of constant confrontation will accomplish what is desired, or be worth the price if it does.
 
Indeed, this thread started out, at least, to be about how we talk to, and occasionally of, others. And as such I've found it interesting and thought-provoking. There are plenty of ways and plenty of places to argue about policy, but the relentless intrusion of policy into our discourse, the apparent insistence that you cannot ever let your moral and political beliefs go unexpressed, makes our lives (I think) burdensome and unnecessarily contentious. I may of course be wrong, as I often am, and I may care a whole lot less about the social decay that bothers many, as I almost certainly do; but I am not entirely convinced that an atmosphere of constant confrontation will accomplish what is desired, or be worth the price if it does.
No, you're taking it there. Until Prestige mentioned it about a half a page ago, bathrooms hadn't been mentioned.

The social decay were seeing is when people are unnecessarily cruel to each other. As someone who was bullied severely from about 8 years old to 16, I learned how and why humans pick on others. How people who are generally good devolve into being monsters. How they justify bad behavior because others misbehave. How people are first dehumanized and then mistreated. Trans people are no different than any other outside group or person.

Bad or unkind behavior is never justified in my book. We can forgive it. But it would be better if we didn't have to.
 
You're welcome.

It's a shame, because the author makes a good point, that changing an attackers pronouns from he to she does make a big difference in how we perceive what is going on. But the 'pronouns are roofies' catch phrase is so dimwitted that they should have had a competent editor suggest replacing that phrase with something less stupid. A good point is easily lost when you sledgehammer silliness on top of it. It's a bit like the pronoun usage theme- I perceive the author as being a flake every time I read 'Pronouns are Rophynol' and it eclipses the otherwise valid observations.
 
People with vested interest seem so quick to apply the label  hate to what is so frequently nothing more than indiference. There are people in this world to whom prounoun use is of utmost importance. Fine. I have no animosity toward them. And if I ever encounter one IRL I will make a reasonable attempt to follow their wishes.. This being way way down on my own personal list of priorities I can mak no guarantees that there will not be slip ups and forgetfulness. It is incumbent among those who prioritize pronouns to realize that many others do not share those priorities and to make allowances without assuming intentions and applying blame
 
Cool justification for dismissing the point of the article.

(Cross-posting. This was a reply to Thermal.)
 
Last edited:
Cool justification for dismissing the point of the article.

(Cross-posting. This was a reply to Thermal.)
I didn't read the article. I determined it was worthless when the title equated pronouns to the date rape drug.
 
No, you're taking it there. Until Prestige mentioned it about a half a page ago, bathrooms hadn't been mentioned.

The social decay were seeing is when people are unnecessarily cruel to each other. As someone who was bullied severely from about 8 years old to 16, I learned how and why humans pick on others. How people who are generally good devolve into being monsters. How they justify bad behavior because others misbehave. How people are first dehumanized and then mistreated. Trans people are no different than any other outside group or person.

Bad or unkind behavior is never justified in my book. We can forgive it. But it would be better if we didn't have to.
Funny, thought I was agreeing with you here, not quite sure how I said it wrong, or for that matter where I mentioned bathrooms. Those who adamantly oppose transsexuals, like their forebears who opposed homosexuality, like their forebears who opposed women voting and wearing sleeveless swimsuits, etc., are the ones I see as fearing the social decay I meant. I do not see their corresponding assault on the basic and ultimately simple rules of civil behavior as decay: it is too purposeful and too immediate. Burn down the village to save it.
 
Funny, thought I was agreeing with you here, not quite sure how I said it wrong, or for that matter where I mentioned bathrooms. Those who adamantly oppose transsexuals, like their forebears who opposed homosexuality, like their forebears who opposed women voting and wearing sleeveless swimsuits, etc., are the ones I see as fearing the social decay I meant. I do not see their corresponding assault on the basic and ultimately simple rules of civil behavior as decay: it is too purposeful and too immediate. Burn down the village to save it.
My mistake.
 
No it doesn't. Someone is just looking for an excuse to hate the different ones.
I'm sorry you judge me that way, apparently without considering anything I wrote. My comment involved concern for children and vulnerable people, and should give any thinking person no indication of hatred towards anyone at all.
The social decay were seeing is when people are unnecessarily cruel to each other. As someone who was bullied severely from about 8 years old to 16, I learned how and why humans pick on others. How people who are generally good devolve into being monsters. How they justify bad behavior because others misbehave. How people are first dehumanized and then mistreated.
I'm sorry you were severely bullied, and I agree that some people pick on others. But there are other, more complex processes in the world that cause harm, including ill-informed attempts to avoid it. Colluding with dangerous fantasies of people misled about their sex, so as not to 'hurt' them, is one such.
Trans people are no different than any other outside group or person.
So-called "trans people" are no different than any inside group or person. There is no such condition as "being transgendered" in any ontological sense. It simply describes someone who is confused about their sex.
Bad or unkind behavior is never justified in my book. We can forgive it. But it would be better if we didn't have to.
Unkind behaviour? I wonder if you've really thought about how you define that. What about ignoring everything I wrote and calling me someone who "is just looking to hate the different ones"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom