• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's Second Term

Null and Void

Oversight Committee
@GOPoversight
There is NO paper trail to prove Joe Biden approved the pardons signed by autopen.

There's no evidence he even participated in the process to make decisions on these signatures.

His inner circle covered up his decline and put America in grave danger.

NULL and VOID!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1996689822598025576
 
newyorkguy said:
In this latest trump effort to steer Americans back to using fossil fuel-powered vehicles, does the trump admin discuss the policy's effect on climate change? Or is trump still arguing there's no such thing as climate change?
Click to expand...
To answer my own question, yes trump is still denying climate change. In an interview with Bev Turner on GB News in mid-November, trump said:
“… you know, when they talk about the climate, it’s the whole thing is a hoax…It’s the whole thing is a hoax and your country, among others but your country is one of the worst." London School of Economics article link
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Jack by the hedge said:
Do you have a personal favourite pick from the chain of command you prefer to blame for the order to wipe out the survivors?
Click to expand...
You don't get to do that.

For the last several days the narrative was that Hegseth was watching the US military conduct strikes are narco-terrorists. When he saw that there were survivors after one strike, he ordered a second strike to "kill them all." That did not happen according to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the admiral who actually ordered the second strike.

Admiral Bradley ordered the second strike, not Hegseth.
 
Bogative said:
You don't get to do that.

For the last several days the narrative was that Hegseth was watching the US military conduct strikes are narco-terrorists. When he saw that there were survivors after one strike, he ordered a second strike to "kill them all." That did not happen according to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the admiral who actually ordered the second strike.

Admiral Bradley ordered the second strike, not Hegseth.
Click to expand...
Hook, line, and sinker.
 
Bogative said:
You don't get to do that.

For the last several days the narrative was that Hegseth was watching the US military conduct strikes are narco-terrorists. When he saw that there were survivors after one strike, he ordered a second strike to "kill them all." That did not happen according to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the admiral who actually ordered the second strike.

Admiral Bradley ordered the second strike, not Hegseth.
Click to expand...
I don't get to ask you what you think happened? Why's that?

I get what you're saying: there was a rumour Hegseth gave a direct order to kill the survivors and a bunch of people believed that rumour. And now that someone's said that didn't happen, you're very much enjoying telling everyone some people were fooled into believing the matter of responsibility was settled when it wasn't.

Anyway, while I don't want to interrupt your fun, it rather does still look as if they did kill all the survivors. So someone gave that order. Thus it seems now we have round 2 of the game, which is whether we believe this new version of events. Do you believe Admiral Bradley decided, on his own initiative, that wiping out all the survivors was his correct and lawful course of action? I'm willing to stick my neck out and say I have a harder time believing that rather than believing it of Hegseth, who told us in a speech about his wish not to burden his war fighters with such namby pamby stuff as rules of engagement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom