• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Does 'rape culture' accurately describe (many) societies?

Poem said:
The experts I have been citing don't actually look at the porn they are evaluating?

Gabby Bertin speaking on Sky News about violence and misogyny etc:
Click to expand...
So? This is all opinions of people with personal biased agendas. Who cares?
 
Poem said:
It is an offence to cause a child under the age of 16 to view porn
Click to expand...
Ah see I was not picturing a Clockwork Orange kind of scenario but rather 'there's a laptop there' and the kids get to not look, or change it over to Roblox or whatever if they'd rather do something else.

Really I'd rather not force a kid to consume anything, even teaching works better with engagement than force.

The idea that a kid that isn't interested yet is going to be instantly addicted to porn is even sillier than the idea that porn is any more addictive than anything easy and fun to anyone that has healthy outlets. The Youth in general struggles more with an unhealthy relationship to video games than to porn, I bet u a whole basket of eggs. The ones with an unhealthy relationship to porn are more likely to admit they have a problem though.
 
acbytesla said:
No, it's not.
Click to expand...
You are the one potentially showing porn to children - so you need to explain yourself. I've got the kids in the Church. - same as everyone else here I assume.
 
Last edited:
Poem said:
You are the one potentially showing porn to children - so you are the one who needs to explain yourself.
Click to expand...
No, you're wrong. "Potentially," doesn't mean crap. That would get thrown out in a second. Let me know when someone in the UK is charged with that offense.
 
Poem said:
The experts I have been citing don't actually look at the porn they are evaluating?

Gabby Bertin speaking on Sky News about violence and misogyny etc (cued):
Click to expand...

What expertise or authority over social matters is signified by the title "Baroness?"

"My ancestors were rich so I know what's good for the peasants." Disgusting. Should we take a close look at the harms to children carried out by the peerage over the past few centuries, and decide whether a ban on hereditary aristocratic titles would do more good than a ban on porn?
 
Poem said:
Meaningless.

You would take kids to watch porn, rather than to a church - that is what we know.
Click to expand...
No, I said I would prefer them watching porn than going to church. And what they view at an internet cafe is their choice. Not mine.
 
acbytesla said:
No, I said I would prefer them watching porn than going to church. And what they view at an internet cafe is their choice. Not mine.
Click to expand...
Just stop. What you are doing is backtracking. Go back and read what I wrote. You even said:

2. Is something very natural.

This is what I wrote:
2. A private internet cafe where they will be treated to Pornhub et al content for the same amount of time.

The truth is is that you are taking them to the Church. End of.
 
Poem said:
You would take kids to watch porn, rather than to a church - that is what we know.
Click to expand...
You are the one who proposed a hypothetical scenario and then switched to talking about it like it was a real-world situation. In the actual real world, nobody has to choose church or cafe with a laptop on pornhub or whatever, they can just go to the park. In the real world, the most ◊◊◊◊◊◊ up person is the one creating a scenario where someone is actually forced to choose between those two, not the person who is forced to choose whatever they see as the least bad option.
 
Lithrael said:
You are the one who proposed a hypothetical scenario and then switched to talking about it like it was a real-world situation. In the actual real world, nobody has to choose church or cafe with a laptop on pornhub or whatever, they can just go to the park. In the real world, the most ◊◊◊◊◊◊ up person is the one creating a scenario where someone is actually forced to choose between those two, not the person who is forced to choose whatever they see as the least bad option.
Click to expand...
You are not following.
 
Look, Poem, you're the one who described it as 'treated to.' You can be 'treated to' a plate of cupcakes or a free drink; that means you can have it if you want it, not that it's forced down your gullet or even placed in your hands. Don't be mad because you phrased whatever you meant in a more twee way than you intended.
 
Lithrael said:
Look, Poem, you're the one who described it as 'treated to.' You can be 'treated to' a plate of cupcakes or a free drink; that means you can have it if you want it, not that it's forced down your gullet or even placed in your hands. Don't be mad because you phrased whatever you meant in a more twee way than you intended.
Click to expand...
The alternatives were and are clear from:
acbytesla said:
I'm of the belief that more harm to children is done at any and every church or mosque than is ever done by kids looking at porn.
Click to expand...
 
If I believe that more harm is done to children by Z than X that doesn't imply that I WANT to go providing them with X. Much less forcing them to consume X.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom