Trump's Second Term

Oddly enough, that's sort of correct. But the only people arguing against it should be other scientists.

I disagree, after all Einstein was famously a patent clerk when he started revolutionising physics, but it should be people who understand what they're arguing against and present honest evidence to back up their arguement.
 
So his healthcare plan is to not have one.

Trump: I want the money to go directly to you. You’ll go out and buy your own health insurance and you’ll negotiate different plans… you will be an entrepreneur for yourself.

Says the man that went to court to stop payment

Trump: They cut off food stamp benefits for millions and millions more Americans in need. You should not forget this when we come up to midterms


Trump: "Obamacare was a disaster...I'm calling today for this massive amount of money be paid directly to the people of our country so they can buy their own healthcare...We're going to forget this Obamacare."


Don't pay insurance companies.

Trump: I am calling today for insurance companies not to be paid, before for this massive amount of money to be paid directly to the people of our country that they can buy their own health care

STFU, you drooling, doddering, lying, ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ moron,
 
I disagree, after all Einstein was famously a patent clerk when he started revolutionising physics, but it should be people who understand what they're arguing against and present honest evidence to back up their arguement.
Although I too disagree with @alfaniner on this, and it is certainly true that Einstein was a patent clerk when he started to revolutionize physics, it is also true that Einstein was already a scientist when he became a patent clerk.

In 1900, Einstein completed a program of study in mathematics and physics that qualified him to teach those subjects. As best I can tell, that was substantially equivalent to a modern BS degree, and it was awarded by the school that is now known as ETH Zurich and proudly acknowledges Einstein as an alumnus. While employed full time at the patent office, Einstein completed his PhD (in 1905) at the University of Zurich, which is another prestigious university that proudly acknowledges Einstein as an alumnus. Einstein's employment at the patent office did not end until 1909, four years after his annus mirabilis.
 
Although I too disagree with @alfaniner on this, and it is certainly true that Einstein was a patent clerk when he started to revolutionize physics, it is also true that Einstein was already a scientist when he became a patent clerk.

In 1900, Einstein completed a program of study in mathematics and physics that qualified him to teach those subjects. As best I can tell, that was substantially equivalent to a modern BS degree, and it was awarded by the school that is now known as ETH Zurich and proudly acknowledges Einstein as an alumnus. While employed full time at the patent office, Einstein completed his PhD (in 1905) at the University of Zurich, which is another prestigious university that proudly acknowledges Einstein as an alumnus. Einstein's employment at the patent office did not end until 1909, four years after his annus mirabilis.


The bit about Einstien was frippery TBH, I know the golden age of the amature scientist is long gone, but my point was just that what is important is less how someone is designated (After all one can be a scientist and competent in one field but still ignorant or even a full on crank in another) but rather understanding of the subject under consideration and willingness and ability to bring evidence to support your position.
 
It really irks me when people use the term draft dodger. It blatantly identifies them as someone incapable of distinguishing between truth and propaganda. They are victims of a decades long multigenerational propaganda campaign that obviously is still working. The indoctrinated indoctrinate the next generation ad infinitum. - JustMyOpinion
What, then, was it that Trump did to avoid being sent to Viet Nam?

What has happened to his supposed exorstoses, which were soooo bad he couldn't be drafted, but seem to have had no observable effects on him since?

just a fortunate son, I guess?
 
Oddly enough, that's sort of correct. But the only people arguing against it should be other scientists.
It's only correct if you think in a different frame from Vance, I think. If you disagree with a scientific finding, you argue about that finding. The point of view of people like Vance is that there is a monolithic thing called "science," and if you see something you disagree with, that means that science is wrong.
 
The bit about Einstien was frippery TBH, I know the golden age of the amature scientist is long gone, but my point was just that what is important is less how someone is designated (After all one can be a scientist and competent in one field but still ignorant or even a full on crank in another) but rather understanding of the subject under consideration and willingness and ability to bring evidence to support your position.
I meant "other people familiar with the scientific method". Not necessarily Ph.Ds and such.
 
It really irks me when people use the term draft dodger. It blatantly identifies them as someone incapable of distinguishing between truth and propaganda. They are victims of a decades long multigenerational propaganda campaign that obviously is still working. The indoctrinated indoctrinate the next generation ad infinitum. - JustMyOpinion
That’s a lot of words used to really not say anything.

Still, welcome to the forum.
.
 

Back
Top Bottom