junkshop
Otto's Favourite
Marathon.
Does this include the actions of the rioters on J6? Property was damaged, some people, including police were attacked and injured. Were they terrorists? Trump said he loved them and gave them pardons, but surely this does not excuse them in your eyes?Burning down cities, smashing storefronts and assaulting people are actions of terrorist groups.
We used to have a man, William F. Buckley Jr, who worked very hard to keep the kooks out. Instead of explaining this on my own, I asked Google Gemini to do it, an excerpt that I include below:I guess this was a comment for me: yes, I am slightly surprised that opposition to the far right in the US is not really materialising among Republicans. In Denmark, and Germany, right-wing parties have gone quite far to keep the far right out of government.
I think it's more a matter of people riding the coattails of success, or, at least, recognizing that resistance is fatal.It is probably because of the two-party system, that encourages "either you are with us, or against us" inside the same party.
That may be true, but it is not true that if you are anti-fascist, you are Antifa.I have no idea how many times this needs to be said:
If you are antifa, you are anti-fascist.
Antifa refers to a set of ideology that is not inclusive of everybody who opposes fascism. That's why members of Antifa beat up or oppose other people who also oppose fascism.Period. That's literally the shortened term.
You would be wrong in doing so, though.Again, you CAN lump everyone who declares themselves to be against fascists as antifa.
But, he probably isn't a member of Antifa. He probably wouldn't join a local group of Antifa. Compared to the Chinese Communist Party, Antifa are a bunch of amateurs.The president of China, who is the leader of the Chinese Communist Party, could be a fan of baseball.
I suspect you might.Shall I go on?
We don't have any fascist leaders in the Republican Party. We have a lot of kooks, some extremists, but no actual fascists. The term is used hyperbolically by the opposition.But why are they in charge of the Republican Party? I think it is because the rest of the party thinks like Opcode: fascists are useful, we can always stop them when they have destroyed the opposition.
This leads to the heart of the matter. Those on the Left who imagine what the law is based on what they want it to be, versus the government enforcing the actual laws. The Left thinks that arresting and deporting people who are in the US illegally is a violation of US law, maybe a violation of the Constitution. The Left thinks that using physical force to stop law enforcement from doing its job is protected speech. The Left thinks that women's rights or reproductive health means the right to kill a fetus, and claims that opposing abortion is an attack on women, even though a lot of women oppose abortion. The Left thinks that redefining the meaning of "man," "woman," "marriage" or anything else changes objective reality. The Left plays a lot of mind games, a lot of word games, to delude the public into going along with their insanity.Saying that you oppose Authoritarianism while taking action to support the people with actual power trying to take our rights and make it reality makes your pretense false.
I gave Google Gemini the following prompt: "A research paper several years ago mathematically proved that a voting system with more than two political parties cannot be fair."If you had functioning multi-party system, you wouldn't have a Republican Party that has members that span from the centre to the far-right, and a Democratic Party that spans the centre to the far left. On paper you can have more than one party, but the election system favours the two parties to the de facto exclusion of everybody else.
Not to mention the things done by Trump.Hyperbole and fear-mongering are not new in politics, but the things done to Trump have crossed into felonious behavior a few times.
We haven't reached the point where our money is not worth the paper on which it is printed. All nations have problems. Pre-Hitler Germany had a lot more problems than modern US does.I have recently noted that 12.5% of the American population needs food coupons to survive. The U.S. doesn't sound to be such a great place either.
They were trying to stabilize a chaotic parliament. The Nazis (NSDAP) and the Communists (KPD), often blocked legislation, making normal function impossible (like what US Congressional Democrats do when they can't get their way) and the nation was still fighting the Great Depression and massive unemployment. Yes, they misestimated Hitler and themselves, and the sinking ship of state made the situation dire.Modern historians tend to think that the crisis was not as deep as usually made out, and Germany was beginning to come out of the crisis by the time Hitler came into power. And Hitler was not as persuasive as you think: he never gained a majority. The reason why he could make his power grab was because conservative useful idiots enabled him.
Does this include the actions of the rioters on J6? Property was damaged, some people, including police were attacked and injured. Were they terrorists? Trump said he loved them and gave them pardons, but surely this does not excuse them in your eyes?
Opcode thinks you can be antifascist and antifa, but you cannot be antifa and antifascist. Nothing that troll says makes a lick of sense. This thread is boring now. lol.Opcode thinks J6 was just a lot of tourists milling around, and anyway, it didn't cause anywhere near the billions of dollars' worth of damage like the alleged burning down of cities (by that violent terrorist group antifa) during the alleged BLM riots.
Opcode thinks you can be antifascist and antifa, but you cannot be antifa and antifascist. Nothing that troll says makes a lick of sense. This thread is boring now. lol.
The Nazis (NSDAP) and the Communists (KPD), often blocked legislation, making normal function impossible (like what US Congressional Democrats do when they can't get their way)
Us normal people can see that the government shut down because Republicans wouldn't budge on healthcare. Republicans control the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of government. They own the government. If they didn't want it shut down, they could have not shut it down. But The Authoritarian in the White House decided that he was going to be stubborn.(like what US Congressional Democrats do when they can't get their way)
The Democrats did not have a lock on all three branches of government at that time.How can anyone type this with a straight face after what Republicans did during Obama's presidency, including preventing him from appointing a Supreme Court judge?
A lot of people have pointed out the hypocrisy of news reporters standing in front of burning buildings set on fire by protesters while claiming these are "mostly peaceful protests," while denouncing the J6 riots, where no fires were set and only a(n unarmed) protester was shot as an insurrection. FWIW, I think the J6 protest was ill-advised, poorly organized and some people clearly committed crimes and should be punished. Others just walked through the doors held open by police and on through the public buildings. It's odd how the Left can ignore an entire Summer of multiple riots by Leftists (including Antifa and BLM) that caused many millions of dollars in damages to private and public property, but obsess on a single riot where nobody died.Does this include the actions of the rioters on J6? Property was damaged, some people, including police were attacked and injured. Were they terrorists? Trump said he loved them and gave them pardons, but surely this does not excuse them in your eyes?
It's odd how the Left can ignore an entire Summer of multiple riots by Leftists (including Antifa and BLM) that caused many millions of dollars in damages to private and public property, but obsess on a single riot where nobody died.
I'm sure that the people who lost their businesses or saw their friends die don't see it that way. The former were terrorist activities based largely on Leftist lies. As for the election, despite assurances to the contrary, the voting results do look strange. It's odd that the candidate whose few public appearances were barely attended had more votes than the candidate whose many appearances had packed venues. It's odd that the election results depended so heavily on voting by mail. Of course, the mere fact that a major election was held during a pandemic, under very dissimilar public distancing rules nationwide, meant it was a weird year in general. I'm not surprised that Trump would protest the results. Some people got carried away. The press, of course, sensationalized it, and the Democrats have always been happy to feed into that energy.Maybe it's because the former was ordinary citizens protesting about legitimate grievances, and the latter was incited by a sitting President in an attempt to prevent the peaceful transition of power to his fairly elected successor?
A President is not in charge of Congressional budget negotiations. If the people who elected the Congressmen wanted Congress to fund these demands, Congress would have. As you said, the Republicans own the three branches, at least for now.Us normal people can see that the government shut down because Republicans wouldn't budge on healthcare. Republicans control the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of government. They own the government. If they didn't want it shut down, they could have not shut it down. But The Authoritarian in the White House decided that he was going to be stubborn.
Congressional voting on Presidential nominees is part of Congress' Constitutionally mandated job. Shutting down the government because you want your tax-and-spend bad idea passed is not.How can anyone type this with a straight face after what Republicans did during Obama's presidency, including preventing him from appointing a Supreme Court judge?