Wow, UK has lost freedom of speech

[Darat]

Exactly. That's basically what they are demanding. We must stop all crime before it happens, all criminal speech before its heard.

The prohibited areas came after the harassment.

 

[Carrot Flower King]

The prohibited areas came after the harassment.

You'd think that several of us hadn't already explained that...

 

[Hercules56]

No. You're repeating the same strawman over and over again; this doesn't make it true

No, actually Im not.

 

[Hercules56]

The prohibited areas came after the harassment.

The 500' Prior Restraint zone was an extreme overkill solution. There is a lot of grey you could have tried first.

 

[Steve]

No. You're repeating the same strawman over and over again; this doesn't make it true

Yes, when a person is devoid of an actual argument and cannot comprehend the subtleties of a person's position this is frequently what we end up with.

 

[catsmate]

No, actually Im not.

Are you really so unable to look at your posts and understand? The rest of us can.


You keep saying crap like:

We must stop all crime before it happens, all criminal speech before its heard.

And attributing it to others here who have said nothing like this.
Frankly it's silly, and demonstrates an unwillingness (or inability) on your part to actually engage in reasonable, reasoned, debate.

Try harder.

 

[catsmate]

Yes, when a person is devoid of an actual argument and cannot comprehend the subtleties of a person's position this is frequently what we end up with.

Unfortunately so.

 

[Steve]

The 500' Prior Restraint zone was an extreme overkill solution. There is a lot of grey you could have tried first.

The legal authorities that actually heard the arguments and applied the laws disagree. I know whose opinion I find more valid.

 

[Mojo]

Ummm, you have spotted Steve's location?

You do know where Nova Scotia is, don't you?

Australia?

 

[catsmate]

The legal authorities that actually heard the arguments and applied the laws disagree. I know whose opinion I find more valid.

And over here the public support for safe access zones is >80%.

 

[smartcooky]

???

Ok, you've never seen Minority Report

 

[Hercules56]

And over here the public support for safe access zones is >80%.

With a 500' limit??

 

[Hercules56]

The legal authorities that actually heard the arguments and applied the laws disagree. I know whose opinion I find more valid.

The opinion of the government is irrelevant. All that matters is the views of the courts and the people.

 

[Mojo]

Lies.

I do not support harrassing of women.

We can all see what you have posted.

 

[Mojo]

Kool. Whatever. I came in here for an argument.

No you didn't.

 

[Mojo]

Are you really so unable to look at your posts and understand? The rest of us can.


You keep saying crap like:

And attributing it to others here who have said nothing like this.
Frankly it's silly, and demonstrates an unwillingness (or inability) on your part to actually engage in reasonable, reasoned, debate.

Try harder.

That's a bit unfair, he might actually believe it.

 

[Hercules56]

We can all see what you have posted.

When have I ever said people should be allowed to harass women?

 

[GlennB]

When have I ever said people should be allowed to harass women?

Strawman (*** giggle ***)

 

[smartcooky]

No you didn't.

Yes he did!

 

[GlennB]

No you didn't.

Are you arguing in your spare time?