Andy_Ross
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 68,566
Donald says the USA will kill them allYou're confused. The USA is not going to commit genocide against the Palestinian people, contrary to your racist sadistic wishes.
Donald says the USA will kill them allYou're confused. The USA is not going to commit genocide against the Palestinian people, contrary to your racist sadistic wishes.
I assume you're being sarcastic here.Your wrong. Those women and children were all HAMAS - or supported it - and so deserved to be slaughtered. Also the doctors, aid workers and journalists who were slaughtered - all HAMAS supporters teh lot of them. Also anyone whose critical of how Israel is handling thegenocideconflict, or who doesn't explicitly support Israel in there efforts to stop the violence.
You're confused. The USA is not going to commit genocide against the Palestinian people, contrary to your racist sadistic wishes.
You absolutely did that. You're framing the issue as "rotting corpses", as if the Israelis are foolish to want the remains of their loved ones back. It's a crappy framing and you know it.Never did that.
My answer hasn't changed since the last time you asked this question.Why are you trying to downplay the enormity of what Israel has done? Why are you trying to discount the feelings of those they have harmed? Nothing Hamas has done justifies the slaughter of tens of thousands of children. Nothing Hamas has done absolves Israel of its crimes against humanity.
Maybe you should think about that.My answer hasn't changed since the last time you asked this question.
Viewing 19 rotting corpses as having more value than 2 million living people, is pretty sick.You absolutely did that. You're framing the issue as "rotting corpses", as if the Israelis are foolish to want the remains of their loved ones back. It's a crappy framing and you know it.
In WWII, the Allies maintained the policy of unconditional surrender towards Germany. We know that some Nazis tried to reach a settlement with the Allies allowing them to remain. The Allies did not detour from unconditional surrender. As a result, millions of civilian Germans were wounded, raped, and killed up to the end of the war. Were the Allies wrong to maintain the policy? Should they have negotiated with Himmler, allowing Nazi officials to stay in place? Or was it right to keep going until the political ideology that led to war was wiped out?Viewing 19 rotting corpses as having more value than 2 million living people, is pretty sick.
Take it to the appropriate thread.In WWII, the Allies maintained the policy of unconditional surrender towards Germany. We know that some Nazis tried to reach a settlement with the Allies allowing them to remain. The Allies did not detour from unconditional surrender. As a result, millions of civilian Germans were wounded, raped, and killed up to the end of the war. Were the Allies wrong to maintain the policy? Should they have negotiated with Himmler, allowing Nazi officials to stay in place? Or was it right to keep going until the political ideology that led to war was wiped out?
Seeking the destruction of Hamas, whether by unconditional surrender or the other thing, seems entirely reasonable.Take it to the appropriate thread.
Living? Or...?I have a relative who was caught up in the attacks on 10/7 and body-snatched into Gaza.
It's right now the "or..." and since no prior announcements are being made of which skeletal remains the Red Cross is picking up, the Israeli public and hostage familes just have to wait until AbuKabir runs their dna tests for identification and notification.Living? Or...?
It's worth knowing that so many people worldwide have our backs.Either way, I am sorry for your loss for what it might be worth![]()
A bigger risk would seem to be one of the unexploded armoured vehicles packed with explosives abandoned by the IDF. A suicide attack using one of those would be far more dangerous.18. (maybe 17 by tomorrow, as the ICRC is being told to send in a transport/morgue truck for another coffin of remains after midnight).
The Turks (about 80 team members) are being told to stand by, because Israel doesn't want them starting to roll around Gaza with their heavy earthmovers all willy-nilly, and end up being hijacked by HAMAS, with the Turks now becoming human shields/hostages, and their equipment now becoming part of HAMAS' offensive tactics --- imagine what an IDF tank crew would have to do if a terrorist crew used a Caterpillar bulldozer and drove right into the fortification position, guns & RPG's ablazing!
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IDF continues to fire at and destroy threatening HAMAS encroachments, this time, as a terrorist crew emerged from a tunnel right under the noses of the static position the Israeli troops were sitting within.
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anyone see news reports about the GHF operations? That group has now stopped working in Gaza.
A bigger risk would seem to be one of the unexploded armoured vehicles packed with explosives abandoned by the IDF. A suicide attack using one of those would be far more dangerous.
That IDF is breaking the cease fire by killing Palestinians is no surprise.
That the GHF has immediately folded and left the supply of humanitarian aid to traditional NGO shows that they were never intended to deliver aid but to control the Palestinian population.
And why is that??The Rafah Crossing, when it does eventually reopen, will do so only for the movement of Palestinians in both directions, not for the entry of aid. (From the article Hercules56 linked as a source)