You asked. You knew my answer would be based on the premises that Hamas is engaging in an immoral war of aggression, that Israel is justified in seeking their destruction by force, that Hamas is not justified in resisting their own destruction, certainly not by embedding themselves in a civilian population so that they can continue their immoral war without substantial consequences to them, and that Hamas is therefore to blame for any civilian deaths arising from them receiving the consequences they deserve for continuing their immoral war.
You knew all this, because we've been over it many times already. But you asked anyway. Why?
We agree that there's evil here. We just don't agree on who the real monsters are. I wish you'd come up with this kind of impassioned rhetoric against evil back when Hamas was launching rockets into Israel every night, or when they carried out the horrifically monstrous 10/7 attack. Maybe if more of the world spoke up the way you're speaking up now, back when Hamas was ascendant, they wouldn't have put Gaza in the situation it is right now.
But no. Somehow the world only finds its voice, only speaks out in full-throated condemnation, in the language of absolute and draconian moral judgement, when Israel responds to horrific immoral aggression. And then the world speaks out this way against the Israeli response. The Hamas provocation never gets this kind of treatment, from you or anyone else.
Maybe try finding some words for Hamas, in your otherwise bottomless well of outrage.