• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University event. / Charlie Kirk Shot And Killed

I notice that you're not actually disagreeing with me that the left has been engaging in inflammatory rhetoric that incites violence against a political viewpoint.
who is "the left" ?
What, exactly, have "they" said?

Problem is that the hatemonger machinery on the right will either take a single data point and show that one over and over, or just make ◊◊◊◊ up and repeat it over and over - like all the "footage" of US cities in flames, most of which are either not from the US or decades old. When you dig into any of it, it is either a nothingburger or originates from a nobody, amplified for maximum outrage.

You are free to say that it seems to you that the left has been engaging in inflammatory rhetoric that incites violence against a political viewpoint, but that is mostly the result of being fed some targeted slop by opinion manufactures.
 
who is "the left" ?
What, exactly, have "they" said?

Problem is that the hatemonger machinery on the right will either take a single data point and show that one over and over, or just make ◊◊◊◊ up and repeat it over and over - like all the "footage" of US cities in flames, most of which are either not from the US or decades old. When you dig into any of it, it is either a nothingburger or originates from a nobody, amplified for maximum outrage.

You are free to say that it seems to you that the left has been engaging in inflammatory rhetoric that incites violence against a political viewpoint, but that is mostly the result of being fed some targeted slop by opinion manufactures.
As I alluded to earlier, if a fascist, upon being rightly being called out as a fascist, retorts with: "*You're* a fascist!", we do indeed at that point have a situation where "both sides" are calling each other fascist, but so what? That does not make their respective rhetorics equivalent in terms of accuracy, justness, prudence, or temperance.

Similarly, calling a candidate who has actually been convicted of crimes in a court of law a criminal who should be in jail is not equivalent to saying the same about a completely different candidate where there is no similarly credible legal or evidentiary basis, especially not if you are going to add that the latter should be "and/or" executed.
 
Last edited:
Once again, the crazy mother ◊◊◊◊◊◊ playing president has declared another U.S. city a war zone and some people are handwringing because members of an obscure internet site are calling that mother ◊◊◊◊◊◊ a fascist.
 
I would certainly expect anti fascist rhetoric and violence to increase when the fascists are not just advocating fascist policies but are in total control of your country and actively carrying them out.

Very good point and a reason that one of the authors of the study discussed upthread cited for a decrease in political violence from the right.

In point of fact, we are seeing political violence from the right almost everyday, but it is state violence and therefore not considered traditional “political violence”.
 
Once again, the crazy mother ◊◊◊◊◊◊ playing president has declared another U.S. city a war zone and some people are handwringing because members of an obscure internet site are calling that mother ◊◊◊◊◊◊ a fascist.

Sending the military into a Democratic city to terrorize the population = not political violence.

Throwing a sandwich at a member of the authoritarian force illegally occupying your city = political violence.
 
Called it:


We should turn this into a drinking game. Every time a bad faith defender of the right cites this study not knowing it disproves the point they think they’re making, we all have to take a shot.
I'm gonna run out and pick up a couple cases of bourbon.
 
I have a half gallon of Jack here, but I think I might have to buy a couple more.

I'll be right back.
I'm gonna run out and pick up a couple cases of bourbon.
No no no, that's playing right into their evil plan, to kill the resistance off by self inflicted alcohol poisoning!

Stay sober, patriots. We gots a long bumpy ride ahead.
 
The Democratic nominee for Attorney General (!) in Virginia fantasizes about having a gun with two bullets and three targets: Hitler, Pol Pot, and the Republican Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates, Todd Gilbert:

"Gilbert gets two shots to the head."
 
The Democratic nominee for Attorney General (!) in Virginia fantasizes about having a gun with two bullets and three targets: Hitler, Pol Pot, and the Republican Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates, Todd Gilbert:

"Gilbert gets two shots to the head."
It's hardly a 'fantasy', man. It's riffing off a well known scene from tv's The Office:

 
No no no, that's playing right into their evil plan, to kill the resistance off by self inflicted alcohol poisoning!

Stay sober, patriots. We gots a long bumpy ride ahead.
Are you kidding? Two cases of bourbon won't even get me to the end of the week!
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom